S Peter Stawicki1, Charles H Cook2, Harry L Anderson3, Laurie Chowayou3, James Cipolla4, Hesham M Ahmed5, Susette M Coyle5, Vicente H Gracias5, David C Evans2, Raffaele Marchigiani4, Raeanna C Adams6, Mark J Seamon7, Niels D Martin8, Steven M Steinberg2, Susan D Moffatt-Bruce2. 1. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: stawicki.ace@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Miami Valley Hospital/Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA. 8. Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unintentionally retained items feature prominently among surgical "never events." Our knowledge of these rare occurrences, including natural history and intraoperative safety omission or variance (SOV) profile, is limited. We sought to bridge existing knowledge gaps by presenting a secondary analysis of a multicenter study focused on these important aspects of retained surgical items (RSIs). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of results from a multicenter retrospective study of RSIs between January 2003 and December 2009. After excluding previously reported intravascular RSIs (n = 13), a total of 71 occurrences were analyzed for (1) item location and type; (2) time to presentation and/or discovery; (3) presenting signs and symptoms; (4) procedure and incision characteristics; (5) pathology reports; and (6) patterns of SOVs abstracted from medical and operative records. These SOV were then grouped into individual vs team errors and single- vs multifactorial occurrences. RESULTS: Among 71 cases, there were 48 women and 23 men. Mean patient age was 49.7 ± 17.5 years (range 19 to 83 years). Mortality was 4 of 71 (5.63%, only 1 attributable to RSI). Twelve cases (16.9%) occurred at nonparticipating referring hospitals. Most RSI procedures (62%) occurred on the day of hospital admission. The median time from index RSI case to retained item removal was 2 days (range <1 to >3,600 days, n = 63). Abdominal RSIs predominated, and plain radiography was the most common identification method. Most RSIs removed early (<24 hours, n = 23) were asymptomatic. The most common clinical/diagnostic findings in the remaining group were focal pain (n = 22), abscess/fluid collection (n = 18), and mass (n = 8). Most common pathology findings included exudative reaction (n = 22), fibrosis (n = 17), and purulence/abscess (n = 15). On detailed review of intraprocedural events, most RSI cases were found to involve team/system errors (50 of 71) and 2 or more SOVs (37 of 71). Isolated human error was seen in less than 10% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that most operations complicated by RSIs were found to involve team/system errors and 2 or more SOVs emphasizes the importance of team safety training. The observation that early RSI removal minimizes patient morbidity and symptoms highlights the need for prompt RSI identification and treatment. The incidence of inflammation-related findings increases significantly with longer retention periods.
BACKGROUND: Unintentionally retained items feature prominently among surgical "never events." Our knowledge of these rare occurrences, including natural history and intraoperative safety omission or variance (SOV) profile, is limited. We sought to bridge existing knowledge gaps by presenting a secondary analysis of a multicenter study focused on these important aspects of retained surgical items (RSIs). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of results from a multicenter retrospective study of RSIs between January 2003 and December 2009. After excluding previously reported intravascular RSIs (n = 13), a total of 71 occurrences were analyzed for (1) item location and type; (2) time to presentation and/or discovery; (3) presenting signs and symptoms; (4) procedure and incision characteristics; (5) pathology reports; and (6) patterns of SOVs abstracted from medical and operative records. These SOV were then grouped into individual vs team errors and single- vs multifactorial occurrences. RESULTS: Among 71 cases, there were 48 women and 23 men. Mean patient age was 49.7 ± 17.5 years (range 19 to 83 years). Mortality was 4 of 71 (5.63%, only 1 attributable to RSI). Twelve cases (16.9%) occurred at nonparticipating referring hospitals. Most RSI procedures (62%) occurred on the day of hospital admission. The median time from index RSI case to retained item removal was 2 days (range <1 to >3,600 days, n = 63). Abdominal RSIs predominated, and plain radiography was the most common identification method. Most RSIs removed early (<24 hours, n = 23) were asymptomatic. The most common clinical/diagnostic findings in the remaining group were focal pain (n = 22), abscess/fluid collection (n = 18), and mass (n = 8). Most common pathology findings included exudative reaction (n = 22), fibrosis (n = 17), and purulence/abscess (n = 15). On detailed review of intraprocedural events, most RSI cases were found to involve team/system errors (50 of 71) and 2 or more SOVs (37 of 71). Isolated human error was seen in less than 10% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that most operations complicated by RSIs were found to involve team/system errors and 2 or more SOVs emphasizes the importance of team safety training. The observation that early RSI removal minimizes patient morbidity and symptoms highlights the need for prompt RSI identification and treatment. The incidence of inflammation-related findings increases significantly with longer retention periods.
Authors: E A Smith; I Akusoba; D M Sabol; S P Stawicki; M A Granson; E C Ellison; S D Moffatt-Bruce Journal: J Postgrad Med Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.476
Authors: T Javier Birriel; Reina Uchino; Noran Barry; Tracy Butryn; Donna M Sabol; Pamela L Valenza; Stanislaw P Stawicki Journal: J Basic Clin Pharm Date: 2015-09
Authors: Michelle C White; Linden S Baxter; Kristin L Close; Vaonandianina A Ravelojaona; Hasiniaina N Rakotoarison; Emily Bruno; Alison Herbert; Vanessa Andean; James Callahan; Hery H Andriamanjato; Mark G Shrime Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michelle C White; Jennifer Peterschmidt; James Callahan; J Edward Fitzgerald; Kristin L Close Journal: Global Health Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.185
Authors: Samuel Weprin; Fabio Crocerossa; Dielle Meyer; Kaitlyn Maddra; David Valancy; Reginald Osardu; Hae Sung Kang; Robert H Moore; Umberto Carbonara; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2021-07-12
Authors: Tammy Kindel; Nicholas Latchana; Mamta Swaroop; Umer I Chaudhry; Sabrena F Noria; Rachel L Choron; Mark J Seamon; Maggie J Lin; Melissa Mao; James Cipolla; Maher El Chaar; Dane Scantling; Niels D Martin; David C Evans; Thomas J Papadimos; Stanislaw P Stawicki Journal: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Date: 2015 Jul-Sep