PURPOSE: To determine whether a plant-based nutrition program in a multicenter, corporate setting improves depression, anxiety, and productivity. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study examined the impact of diet on emotional well-being and productivity. SETTING: The study was conducted in 10 corporate sites of a major U.S. insurance company. SUBJECTS: There were 292 participants (79.8% women, 20.2% men), with body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) and/or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: Either weekly instruction in following a vegan diet or no instruction was given for 18 weeks. MEASURES: Depression and anxiety were measured using the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Work productivity was measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. ANALYSIS: Baseline characteristics were examined by t-test for continuous variables and χ(2) test for categorical variables. Analysis of covariance models were adjusted for baseline covariates. Paired t-tests were used to determine within-group changes and t-tests for between-group differences. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, improvements in impairment because of health (p < .001), overall work impairment because of health (p = .02), non-work-related activity impairment because of health (p < .001), depression (p = .02), anxiety (p = .04), fatigue (p < .001), emotional well-being (p = .01), daily functioning because of physical health (p = .01), and general health (p = 0.02) in the intervention group were significantly greater than in the control group. Results were similar for study completers. CONCLUSION: A dietary intervention improves depression, anxiety, and productivity in a multicenter, corporate setting.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine whether a plant-based nutrition program in a multicenter, corporate setting improves depression, anxiety, and productivity. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study examined the impact of diet on emotional well-being and productivity. SETTING: The study was conducted in 10 corporate sites of a major U.S. insurance company. SUBJECTS: There were 292 participants (79.8% women, 20.2% men), with body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) and/or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: Either weekly instruction in following a vegan diet or no instruction was given for 18 weeks. MEASURES: Depression and anxiety were measured using the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Work productivity was measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. ANALYSIS: Baseline characteristics were examined by t-test for continuous variables and χ(2) test for categorical variables. Analysis of covariance models were adjusted for baseline covariates. Paired t-tests were used to determine within-group changes and t-tests for between-group differences. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, improvements in impairment because of health (p < .001), overall work impairment because of health (p = .02), non-work-related activity impairment because of health (p < .001), depression (p = .02), anxiety (p = .04), fatigue (p < .001), emotional well-being (p = .01), daily functioning because of physical health (p = .01), and general health (p = 0.02) in the intervention group were significantly greater than in the control group. Results were similar for study completers. CONCLUSION: A dietary intervention improves depression, anxiety, and productivity in a multicenter, corporate setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
Depression; Health focus: nutrition; Manuscript format: research; Research purpose: intervention testing, program evaluation; Nutrition; Outcome measure: behavioral, productivity; Prevention Research; Productivity; Setting: workplace; Strategy: education, behavior change; Study design: quasi-experimental; Target population circumstances: education, geographic location, race/ethnicity; Target population: adults; Vegan; Vegetarian; Worksite
Authors: Keryn L Taylor; Steve Simpson; George A Jelinek; Sandra L Neate; Alysha M De Livera; Chelsea R Brown; Emily O'Kearney; Claudia H Marck; Tracey J Weiland Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Felix S Hussenoeder; Ines Conrad; Christoph Engel; Silke Zachariae; Samira Zeynalova; Heide Glaesmer; Andreas Hinz; Veronika Witte; Anke Tönjes; Markus Löffler; Michael Stumvoll; Arno Villringer; Steffi G Riedel-Heller Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.379