Literature DB >> 24524261

The impact of changes in county public health expenditures on general health in the population.

Timothy T Brown1, Maria S Martinez-Gutierrez1, Bahar Navab1.   

Abstract

We estimate the effect of changes in the per capita expenditures of county departments of public health on county-level general health status. Using panel data on 40 counties in California (2001-2009), dynamic panel estimation techniques are combined with the Lewbel instrumental variable technique to estimate an aggregate demand for health function that measures the causal cumulative impact that per capita public health expenditures have on county-level general health status. We find that a $10 long-term increase in per capita public health expenditures would increase the percentage of the population reporting good, very good or excellent health by 0.065 percentage points. Each year expenditures were increased would result in ∼24,000 individuals moving from the 'poor or fair health' category to the 'good, very good or excellent health' category across these 40 counties. In terms of the overall impact of county public health departments on general health status, at current funding levels, each annual expenditure cycle results in over 207,000 individuals being in the 'good, very good or excellent' categories of health status rather than the 'poor or fair' categories.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24524261     DOI: 10.1017/S1744133114000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  12 in total

1.  Personalized Strategies to Activate and Empower Patients in Health Care and Reduce Health Disparities.

Authors:  Jie Chen; C Daniel Mullins; Priscilla Novak; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-04-06

2.  The Subjective Well-Being Method of Valuation: An Application to General Health Status.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The Importance of Health and Social Services Spending to Health Outcomes in Texas, 2010-2016.

Authors:  J Mac McCullough; Jonathon P Leider
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Returns on Investment in California County Departments of Public Health.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Public Health System-Delivered Mental Health Preventive Care Links to Significant Reduction of Health Care Costs.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Priscilla Novak; Howard Goldman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Reducing Preventable Hospitalization and Disparity: Association With Local Health Department Mental Health Promotion Activities.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Robin Bloodworth; Priscilla Novak; Benjamin Le Cook; Howard H Goldman; Michael S Rendall; Stephen B Thomas; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Local Health Department Activities to Reduce Emergency Department Visits for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Priscilla Novak; Robin Bloodworth; Kerry Green; Jie Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.095

8.  Analytic approaches to assess the impact of local spending on sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  David Grembowski; Sungwon Lim; Athena Pantazis; Betty Bekemeier
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.734

9.  Does More Public Health Spending Buy Better Health?

Authors:  James Marton; Jaesang Sung; Peggy Honore
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-13

10.  The differential effects of rural health care access on race-specific mortality.

Authors:  Jeralynn Cossman; Wesley James; Julia Kay Wolf
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.