| Literature DB >> 24523920 |
Ericka Viana Machado Carellos1, Gláucia Manzan Queiroz de Andrade1, Daniel Vitor Vasconcelos-Santos2, José Nélio Januário3, Roberta Maia Castro Romanelli1, Mery Natali Silva Abreu4, Fabiana Maria da Silva5, Ivy Rosa Coelho Loures5, Juliana Queiroz de Andrade6, Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Congenital toxoplasmosis is a public health problem in Brazil. This study aimed to determine risk factors associated with congenital toxoplasmosis in Minas Gerais which is the second largest Brazilian State based on number of inhabitants, and its territorial extension is larger than that of France.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24523920 PMCID: PMC3921220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow chart of the case-control study for assessment of risk factors for congenital toxoplasmosis in the State of Minas Gerais.
a Minas Gerais State Social Responsibility Index. b Municipality from the same stratum that replaced Joaíma due to unsuccessful contact. c Four mothers/children were excluded due to suspected gestational/congenital toxoplasmosis. d Included mothers of children aged up to six months. In Barbacena, interviews took place at the central vaccination center of the municipality.
Univariate analysis of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of mothers of children with congenital toxoplasmosis and their controls identified in the scope of the newborn screening program in the State of Minas Gerais.
| Variables | Cases (n = 175) | Controls (n = 278) |
| OR (CI 95%) | ||||
| n | Frequency(%) | Median (P25;P75) | n | Frequency (%) | Median (P25;P75) | |||
| Mother age at delivery | 175 | - | 22 (19; 28) | 276 | - | 27 (22; 32) | <0.01 | 0.91 (0.88–0.94) |
| Adolescent mother (up to 19 years old) | 175 | 55 (31.4) | - | 276 | 33 (12) | - | <0.01 | 3.37 (2.08–5.47) |
| Mother's years of at school | 173 | - | 7 (5; 10) | 278 | - | 11 (8; 11) | <0.01 | 0.79 (0.74–0.85) |
| Income lower than 1 minimum salary | 168 | 44 (26.2) | - | 276 | 27 (9.8) | - | <0.01 | 3.27 (1.93–5.53) |
| Domicile in a rural area | 174 | 58 (33.3) | - | 278 | 20 (7.2) | - | <0.01 | 6.45 (3.71–11.2) |
| Own home (legalized) | 173 | 91 (52.6) | - | 278 | 167 (60.1) | - | 0.12 | 0.74 (0.50–1.08) |
| Masonry house | 175 | 164 (93.7) | - | 275 | 273 (99.3) | - | <0.01 | 0.11 (0.02–0.50) |
| Number of rooms | 173 | - | 3 (2; 4) | 278 | - | 3 (3; 4) | 0.68 | 0.95 (0.82–1.1) |
| Number of dwellers | 174 | - | 3 (2; 5) | 278 | - | 3 (2; 4) | 0.17 | 1.16 (1.04–1.23) |
| Coated floor | 175 | 167 (95.4) | - | 278 | 278 (100) | - | <0.01 | 0.37 (0.33–0.42) |
| Electric light at home | 174 | 166 (95.4) | - | 278 | 266 (95.7) | - | 0.89 | 0.94 (0.37–2.34) |
| Home with flush toilet | 174 | 146 (83.9) | - | 278 | 275 (98.9) | - | <0.01 | 0.06 (0.02–0.19) |
| Sanitary sewage | 173 | 107 (61.8) | 278 | 240 (86.3) | <0.01 | 0.26 (0.16–0.41) | ||
Not statistically significant: p-value>0.05.
Years of study.
Minimum salary in December 2006 for the cases and December 2010 for the control group.
Compared with wood house. Three mothers in the control group lived in an apartment building.
Univariate analysis of the characteristics of prenatal care provided to the mothers of children with congenital toxoplasmosis and their controls identified in the scope of the newborn screen program of the State of Minas Gerais.
| Variables | Cases (n = 175) | Controls (n = 278) | p-value | OR (CI 95%) | ||||
| n | Frequency (%) | Median (P25;P75) | n | Frequency (%) | Median (P25;P75) | |||
| At least one prenatal care appointment | 175 | 174 (99.4) | 278 | 275 (98.9) | NS | 1.90 (0.20–18.4) | ||
| Number of appointments | 171 | 6 (5; 8) | 266 | 8 (6; 10) | <0.01 | 0.76 (0.69–0.83) | ||
| Prenatal care paid with own resources | 172 | 20 (11.6) | 272 | 79 (29.0) | <0.01 | 0.32 (0.19–0.55) | ||
| Inadequate prophylaxis against tetanus | 170 | 9 (5.3) | 273 | 31 (11.4) | 0.03 | 0.44 (0.20–0.94) | ||
| Obstetrical ultrasound | 174 | 157 (90.2) | 278 | 275 (98.9) | <0.01 | 0.10 (0.03–0.35) | ||
| Anti-HIV test | 166 | 128 (77.1) | 93 | 93 (100.0) | NA | NA | ||
| VDRL test | 165 | 156 (94.5) | 97 | 97 (100.0) | NA | NA | ||
| HBsAg test | 147 | 66 (44.9) | 89 | 84 (94.4) | NA | NA | ||
| Serology for toxoplasmosis | 168 | 103 (61.3) | 105 | 94 (89.5) | NA | NA | ||
| Prophylactic guidance | 174 | 30 (17.2) | 275 | 45 (16.4) | 0.81 | 1.06 (0.64–1.77) | ||
| Guidance at the first appointment | 28 | 14 (50) | 42 | 17 (40.5) | 0.43 | 1.47 (0.56–3.85) | ||
| Guidance to avoid contact with cats | 174 | 28 (16.1) | 274 | 41 (15.0) | 0.75 | 1.09 (0.65–1.84) | ||
| Guidance to avoid direct contact with soil | 174 | 5 (2.9) | 274 | 14 (5.1) | 0.25 | 0.55 (0.19–1.55) | ||
| Guidance not to consume undercooked meat | 174 | 16 (9.2) | 274 | 29 (10.6) | 0.63 | 0.86 (0.45–1.63) | ||
| Guidance to wash fruits and vegetables before eating | 174 | 14 (8.0) | 274 | 32 (11.7) | 0.22 | 0.66 (0.34–1.28) | ||
| Guidance to avoid contact with raw meat without gloves | 174 | 1 (0.6) | 274 | 6 (2.2) | 0.26 | 0.26 (0.03–2.16) | ||
| Guidance to avoid tasting food while preparing it | 174 | 1 (0.6) | 274 | 7 (2.6) | 0.16 | 0.18 (0.02–1.57) | ||
NA: Not Applicable.
NS: Not statistically significant at p-value>0.05.
Information unavailable for most controls due to lack of the mother and child health care report.
Among the women who received any information about preventing toxoplasmosis during pregnancy.
Figure 2Bar diagram based on the proportion of mothers in both case (175) and control (278) groups who claimed to have knowledge of how to prevent toxoplasmosis.
Univariate analysis of the lifestyle and environmental factors favorable to the T. gondii transmission among mothers of children with congenital toxoplasmosis and their controls identified in the scope of the newborn screen program of the State of Minas Gerais
| Variables | Cases (n = 175) | Controls (n = 278) |
| OR (CI 95%) | ||
| n | Frequency (%) | n | Frequency (%) | |||
| Owning cats during pregnancy | 175 | 61 (34.9) | 278 | 40 (14.4) | <0.01 | 3.18 (2.02–5.03) |
| Cats walking around outside the residence | 61 | 56 (91.8) | 40 | 32 (80.0) | 0.08 | 2.80 (0.84–9.28) |
| Report of contact with the cat | 61 | 24 (39.3) | 40 | 20 (50.0) | 0.29 | 0.65 (0.29–1.45) |
| Handle cats' feces without glove | 61 | 9 (14.8) | 40 | 6 (15.0) | 0.97 | 0.98 (0.32–3.00) |
| Visiting homes where cats live | 171 | 120 (70.2) | 273 | 111 (40.7) | <0.01 | 3.43 (2.29–5.16) |
| Owning dogs during pregnancy | 175 | 101 (57.7) | 278 | 148 (53.2) | 0.35 | 1.20 (0.82–1.76) |
| Eating raw or undercooked meat | 171 | 68 (39.8) | 278 | 64 (23.0) | <0.01 | 2.21 (1.46–3.34) |
| Frequency higher than once a week | 68 | 17 (25) | 64 | 13 (20.3) | 0.52 | 1.31 (0.58–2.97) |
| Beef | 67 | 63 (94) | 64 | 53 (82.8) | 0.04 | 3.27 (0.98–10.9) |
| Pork | 67 | 26 (38.8) | 64 | 31 (48.4) | 0.27 | 0.67 (0.34–1.35) |
| Chicken | 67 | 10 (14.9) | 64 | 4 (6.3) | 0.11 | 2.63 (0.78–8.87) |
| Fish | 68 | 3 (4.4) | 64 | 4 (6.3) | 0.64 | 0.69 (0.15–3.22) |
| Eating fresh meat (not previously frozen) | 175 | 151 (86.3) | 278 | 177 (63.7) | <0.01 | 3.59 (2.19–5.89) |
| Drinking treated or boiled water | 172 | 123 (71.5) | 278 | 268 (96.4) | <0.01 | 0.09 (0.05–0.19) |
| Drinking raw milk (not boiling it) | 174 | 79 (45.4) | 278 | 98 (35.3) | 0.03 | 1.53 (1.04–2.25) |
| Frequency higher than once a week | 78 | 48 (61.5) | 98 | 69 (70.4) | 0.22 | 0.67 (0.36–1.26) |
| Eating egg with soft yolk | 174 | 63 (36.2) | 278 | 80 (28.8) | 0.10 | 1.40 (0.94–2.10) |
| Eating raw vegetables away from home | 174 | 114 (65.5) | 278 | 176 (63.3) | 0.63 | 1.10 (0.74–1.64) |
| Eating away from home during pregnancy | 175 | 152 (86.9) | 278 | 252 (90.6) | 0.21 | 0.68 (0.38–1.24) |
| Habit of tasting the condiments while cooking | 167 | 128 (76.6) | 272 | 206 (75.7) | 0.83 | 1.05 (0.67–1.65) |
| Habit of washing the hands after cooking | 168 | 135 (80.4) | 272 | 221 (81.3) | 0.82 | 0.94 (0.58–1.54) |
| Habit of washing the hands before eating | 174 | 129 (74.1) | 278 | 228 (82.0) | 0.05 | 0.63 (0.40–0.99) |
| Contact with soil during pregnancy | 175 | 76 (43.4) | 278 | 57 (20.5) | <0.01 | 2.98 (1.96–4.52) |
| Frequency higher than once a week | 73 | 33 (45.2) | 57 | 20 (35.1) | 0.24 | 1.53 (0.75–3.11) |
| Contact with soil without gloves | 75 | 74 (98.7) | 57 | 53 (93.0) | 0.16 | 5.58 (0.61–51.4) |
| Livestock | 175 | 81 (46.3) | 277 | 62 (22.4) | <0.01 | 2.99 (1.98–4.50) |
| Pigs | 81 | 30 (37) | 62 | 9 (14.5) | <0.01 | 3.46 (1.50–8.01) |
| Cattle | 81 | 13 (16) | 62 | 10 (16.1) | 0.99 | 0.99 (0.40–2.45) |
| Rabbits | 81 | 4 (4.9) | 62 | 4 (6.5) | 0.73 | 0.75 (0.18–3.14) |
| Birds | 81 | 73 (90.1) | 62 | 58 (93.5) | 0.46 | 0.63 (0.18–2.19) |
| Cats in the neighborhood | 174 | 139 (79.9) | 276 | 167 (60.5) | <0.01 | 2.59 (1.67–4.03) |
| Reports of cockroach at home | 173 | 114 (65.9) | 276 | 155 (56.2) | 0.04 | 1.51 (1.02–2.24) |
NA: Not Applicable.
NS: Not statistically significant at p-value>0.05.
Among mothers that reported the risk factor.
Among the mothers that cooked during pregnancy.
Multivariate analysis of the risk factors associated with congenital toxoplasmosis in the State of Minas Gerais.
| Variables | Total | Urban/peri- urban | Rural | |||
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Home with flush toilet | 0.18 (0.04–0.78) | 0.02 | NA | NS | 0.06 (0.00–1.01) | 0.05 |
| Drinking treated or boiled water | 0.21 (0.08–0.51) | <0.01 | NA | NS | 0.03 (0.00–0.20) | <0.01 |
| Mother's years of education at school | 0.85 (0.78–0.92) | <0.01 | 0.83 (0.76–0.91) | <0.01 | NA | NS |
| Mother age at delivery | 0.89 (0.85–0.93) | <0.01 | 0.89 (0.85–0.93) | <0.01 | 0.88 (0.78–0.98) | 0.02 |
| Not a cat owner | NA | NS | NA | NS | NA | NS |
| Owning cats | 1.90 (1.09–3.31) | 0.02 | 1.92 (1.08–3.42) | 0.03 | NA | NS |
| Owning cats | 2.61 (1.19–5.73) | 0.02 | 2.88 (1.21–6.86) | 0.02 | NA | NS |
| Cats in the neighborhood | 2.27 (1.27–4.06) | 0.01 | 2.10 (1.14–3.85) | 0.02 | 5.77 (1.08–30.9) | 0.04 |
| Contact with soil during pregnancy | 2.29 (1.32–3.96) | <0.01 | 2.31 (1.26–4.22) | 0.01 | NA | NS |
| Eating fresh meat (not previously frozen) | 3.97 (2.17–7.25) | <0.01 | 4.66 (2.37–9.15) | <0.01 | NA | NS |
NA: Not Applicable. NS: Not statistically significant at p-value>0.05.
Cases = 166/controls = 270. Adjusted model – Hosmer & Lemeshow's statistics (p value = 0.49).
Cases = 109/Controls = 250. Adjusted model – Hosmer & Lemeshow's statistics (p value = 0.46).
Cases = 56/Controls = 20. Adjusted model – Hosmer & Lemeshow's statistics (p value = 0.99).
The higher the variable value, the lower the probability of congenital toxoplasmosis.