| Literature DB >> 24523641 |
Salman A Khan1, Abdullah M Asiri2, Khalid Al-Amry1, Maqsood Ahmad Malik1.
Abstract
Metal complexes were prepared by the reaction of thiosemicarbazone with CuCl2, NiCl2, CoCl2, Cu(OAc)2, Ni(OAc)2, and Co(OAc)2. The thiosemicarbazone coordinates to metal through the thionic sulfur and the azomethine nitrogen. The thiosemicarbazone was obtained by the thiosemicarbazide with 3-acetyl-2,5-dimethylthiophene. The identities of these compounds were elucidated by IR, (1)H, (13)C-NMR, and GC-MS spectroscopic methods and elemental analyses. The antibacterial activity of these compounds was first tested in vitro by the disc diffusion assay against two Gram-positive and two Gram-negative bacteria, and then the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by using chloramphenicol as reference drug. The results showed that compound 1.1 is better inhibitor of both types of tested bacteria as compared to chloramphenicol.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24523641 PMCID: PMC3913194 DOI: 10.1155/2014/592375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Scheme 1Antibacterial activity of thiosemicarbazone and its metal complexes, positive control chloramphenicol (Chlora.) and negative control (DMSO) measured by the halo zone test (unit, mm).
| Compounds | Corresponding effect on microorganisms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 9.2 ± 0.3 | 9.0 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.5 |
| 1.1 | 17.2 ± 0.2 | 17.6 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.4 | 20.2 ± 0.4 |
| 1.2 | 15.2 ± 0.4 | 15.8 ± 0.3 | 15.4 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.8 |
| 1.3 | 11.6 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 12.6 ± 0.4 | 11.8 ± 0.4 |
| 1.4 | 12.4 ± 0.4 | 11.8 ± 0.2 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 11.6 ± 0.5 |
| 1.5 | 11.6 ± 0.3 | 12.4 ± 0.4 | 13.2 ± 0.4 | 12.6 ± 0.4 |
| 1.6 | 11.2 ± 0.4 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 12.4 ± 0.5 | 13.2 ± 0.2 |
| Chloro. | 17.0 ± 0.5 | 18.2 ± 0.4 | 17.2 ± 0.8 | 20.0 ± 0.2 |
| DMSO | — | — | — | — |
Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of thiosemicarbazone and its metal complexes.
| Bacterial strain | MIC ( | Positive control | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | ||
|
| 512 | 32 | 64 | 128 | 64 | 128 | 64 | 32 |
|
| 512 | 32 | 64 | 128 | 128 | 256 | 128 | 32 |
|
| 128 | 32 | 32 | 256 | 128 | 256 | 128 | 32 |
|
| 128 | 32 | 32 | 256 | 256 | 128 | 64 | 32 |
Figure 1Structure of metal complexes, where R is AcO, Cl, and M is Cu(II), Ni(II), and Co(II).
Figure 3Electrochemical properties of the compounds 1–1.6.
| Compounds | Epa | Epc | ΔEp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.989 | 0.50 | |
| 1.1 | 0.40 | −0.60 | 0.39 |
| 1.2 | 0.26, 0.65 | 0.32, −0.52 | 0.45 |
| 1.3 | 0.32, 0.73 | 0.41, −0.39 | 0.40 |
| 1.4 | 0.29, 0.84 | 0.34, −0.59 | 0.78 |
| 1.5 | 0.33, 0.69 | −0.36 | 0.61 |
| 1.6 | 0.32, 0.79 | 0.29, −0.43 | 0.65 |
Figure 2Cyclic voltammogram of ligand and its metal complexes.