OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between multiple pharmacy use and medication adherence and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional propensity score-weighted analysis. SETTING: 2009 claims data. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 926,956 Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged 65 and older continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D that year who filled one or more prescriptions at a community retail or mail order pharmacy. MEASUREMENTS: Multiple pharmacy use was defined as concurrent (overlapping time periods) or sequential use (non-overlapping time periods) of ≥ 2 pharmacies in the year. Medication adherence was calculated using a proportion of days covered of 0.80 or greater for eight therapeutic categories (beta-blockers, renin angiotensin system antagonists, calcium channel blockers, statins, sulfonylureas, biguanides (metformin), thiazolidinediones, and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors). Potential DDIs arising from use of certain drugs across a broad set of classes were defined as the concurrent filling of two interacting drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 38.1% of the sample used multiple pharmacies. Those using multiple pharmacies (concurrently or sequentially) consistently had higher adjusted odds of nonadherence (ranging from 1.10 to 1.31, P < .001) across all chronic medication classes assessed after controlling for sociodemographic, health status, and access to care factors than single pharmacy users. The adjusted predicted probability of exposure to a DDI was also slightly higher for those using multiple pharmacies concurrently (3.6%) than for single pharmacy users (3.2%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.15) but lower in individuals using multiple pharmacies sequentially (2.8%, AOR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.81-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Filling prescriptions at multiple pharmacies was associated with lower medication adherence across multiple chronic medications and a small but statistically significant greater likelihood of DDIs in concurrent pharmacy users.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between multiple pharmacy use and medication adherence and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional propensity score-weighted analysis. SETTING: 2009 claims data. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 926,956 Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged 65 and older continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D that year who filled one or more prescriptions at a community retail or mail order pharmacy. MEASUREMENTS: Multiple pharmacy use was defined as concurrent (overlapping time periods) or sequential use (non-overlapping time periods) of ≥ 2 pharmacies in the year. Medication adherence was calculated using a proportion of days covered of 0.80 or greater for eight therapeutic categories (beta-blockers, renin angiotensin system antagonists, calcium channel blockers, statins, sulfonylureas, biguanides (metformin), thiazolidinediones, and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors). Potential DDIs arising from use of certain drugs across a broad set of classes were defined as the concurrent filling of two interacting drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 38.1% of the sample used multiple pharmacies. Those using multiple pharmacies (concurrently or sequentially) consistently had higher adjusted odds of nonadherence (ranging from 1.10 to 1.31, P < .001) across all chronic medication classes assessed after controlling for sociodemographic, health status, and access to care factors than single pharmacy users. The adjusted predicted probability of exposure to a DDI was also slightly higher for those using multiple pharmacies concurrently (3.6%) than for single pharmacy users (3.2%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.15) but lower in individuals using multiple pharmacies sequentially (2.8%, AOR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.81-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Filling prescriptions at multiple pharmacies was associated with lower medication adherence across multiple chronic medications and a small but statistically significant greater likelihood of DDIs in concurrent pharmacy users.
Authors: Daniel C Malone; David S Hutchins; Heather Haupert; Philip Hansten; Babette Duncan; Robin C Van Bergen; Steve L Solomon; Richard B Lipton Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Neda Ratanawongsa; Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Courtney R Lyles; Michele Heisler; Howard H Moffet; Nancy Adler; E Margaret Warton; Dean Schillinger Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Dima M Qato; G Caleb Alexander; Rena M Conti; Michael Johnson; Phil Schumm; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Janice B Schwartz; Kenneth E Schmader; Joseph T Hanlon; Darrell R Abernethy; Shelly Gray; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Holly M Holmes; Michael D Murray; Robert Roberts; Michael Joyner; Josh Peterson; David Lindeman; Ming Tai-Seale; Laura Downey; Michael W Rich Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Olivia K Richards; Bradley E Iott; Tammy R Toscos; Jessica A Pater; Shauna R Wagner; Tiffany C Veinot Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Joan M Neuner; Nicole M Fergestrom; Purushottam W Laud; Ann B Nattinger; Kirsten M M Beyer; Kathryn E Flynn; Liliana E Pezzin Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nanette K Wenger; Caroline Lloyd Doherty; Jerry H Gurwitz; Glenn A Hirsch; Holly M Holmes; Matthew S Maurer; Michael D Murray Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Carolyn T Thorpe; Walid F Gellad; Maria K Mor; John P Cashy; John R Pleis; Courtney H Van Houtven; Loren J Schleiden; Joseph T Hanlon; Joshua D Niznik; Ronald L Carico; Chester B Good; Joshua M Thorpe Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 3.734