Literature DB >> 24519878

Prediction of cartilage compressive modulus using multiexponential analysis of T(2) relaxation data and support vector regression.

Onyi N Irrechukwu1, Sarah Von Thaer, Eliot H Frank, Ping-Chang Lin, David A Reiter, Alan J Grodzinsky, Richard G Spencer.   

Abstract

Evaluation of mechanical characteristics of cartilage by magnetic resonance imaging would provide a noninvasive measure of tissue quality both for tissue engineering and when monitoring clinical response to therapeutic interventions for cartilage degradation. We use results from multiexponential transverse relaxation analysis to predict equilibrium and dynamic stiffness of control and degraded bovine nasal cartilage, a biochemical model for articular cartilage. Sulfated glycosaminoglycan concentration/wet weight (ww) and equilibrium and dynamic stiffness decreased with degradation from 103.6 ± 37.0 µg/mg ww, 1.71 ± 1.10 MPa and 15.3 ± 6.7 MPa in controls to 8.25 ± 2.4 µg/mg ww, 0.015 ± 0.006 MPa and 0.89 ± 0.25MPa, respectively, in severely degraded explants. Magnetic resonance measurements were performed on cartilage explants at 4 °C in a 9.4 T wide-bore NMR spectrometer using a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence. Multiexponential T2 analysis revealed four water compartments with T2 values of approximately 0.14, 3, 40 and 150 ms, with corresponding weight fractions of approximately 3, 2, 4 and 91%. Correlations between weight fractions and stiffness based on conventional univariate and multiple linear regressions exhibited a maximum r(2) of 0.65, while those based on support vector regression (SVR) had a maximum r(2) value of 0.90. These results indicate that (i) compartment weight fractions derived from multiexponential analysis reflect cartilage stiffness and (ii) SVR-based multivariate regression exhibits greatly improved accuracy in predicting mechanical properties as compared with conventional regression. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical stiffness; cartilage; multiexponential T2 relaxation; water compartments

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519878      PMCID: PMC4608539          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  48 in total

Review 1.  Composition and structure of articular cartilage: a template for tissue repair.

Authors:  A R Poole; T Kojima; T Yasuda; F Mwale; M Kobayashi; S Laverty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cartilage formation in a hollow fiber bioreactor studied by proton magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  K Potter; J J Butler; C Adams; K W Fishbein; E W McFarland; W E Horton; R G Spencer
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.583

3.  Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage.

Authors:  M T Nieminen; J Töyräs; J Rieppo; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration.

Authors:  L A Setton; D M Elliott; V C Mow
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Electrostatic and non-electrostatic contributions of proteoglycans to the compressive equilibrium modulus of bovine articular cartilage.

Authors:  Clare Canal Guterl; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Improved specificity of cartilage matrix evaluation using multiexponential transverse relaxation analysis applied to pathomimetically degraded cartilage.

Authors:  David A Reiter; Remigio A Roque; Ping-Chang Lin; Stephen B Doty; Nancy Pleshko; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Engineered cartilage generated by nasal chondrocytes is responsive to physical forces resembling joint loading.

Authors:  C Candrian; D Vonwil; A Barbero; E Bonacina; S Miot; J Farhadi; D Wirz; S Dickinson; A Hollander; M Jakob; Z Li; M Alini; M Heberer; I Martin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-01

8.  Feasibility of noninvasive evaluation of biophysical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage by using quantitative MRI.

Authors:  Shogo Miyata; Tomokazu Numano; Kazuhiro Homma; Tetsuya Tateishi; Takashi Ushida
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties.

Authors:  E Lammentausta; P Kiviranta; M J Nissi; M S Laasanen; I Kiviranta; M T Nieminen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  A novel in vivo model for the study of cartilage degradation.

Authors:  J Bishop; A K Greenham; E J Lewis
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.950

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.