Literature DB >> 24519644

Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry.

V Bjelic-Radisic1, T Aigmueller, O Preyer, G Ralph, I Geiss, G Müller, P Riss, P Klug, M Konrad, G Wagner, M Medl, W Umek, P Lozano, K Tamussino, A Tammaa.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several mesh repair systems for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were introduced into clinical practice with limited data on safety, complications or success rates, and impact on sexual function. The Austrian Urogynecology Working Group initiated a registry to assess the use of transvaginal mesh devices for POP repair. We looked at perioperative data, as well as outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010 a total of 20 gynecology departments in Austria participated in the Transvaginal Mesh Registry. Case report forms were completed to gather data on operations, the postoperative course, and results at 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 726 transvaginal procedures with 10 different transvaginal kits were registered. Intra- and perioperative complications were reported in 6.8%. The most common complication was increased intraoperative bleeding (2.2%). Bladder and bowel perforation occurred in 6 (0.8%) and 2 (0.3%) cases. Mesh exposure was seen in 11% at 3 and in 12% at 12 months. 24 (10%) previously asymptomatic patients developed bowel symptoms by 1 year. De novo bladder symptoms were reported in 39 (10%) at 3 and in 26 (11%) at 12 months. Dyspareunia was reported by 7% and 10% of 265 and 181 sexually active patients at 3 and 12 months postoperatively respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 6.8% rate of intra- and perioperative complications is in line with previous reports. Visceral injury was rare. The 12% rate of mesh exposure is consistent with previous series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519644     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2333-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

1.  Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse repair with the Prolift and Elevate vaginal mesh procedures.

Authors:  Gregory P McLennan; Larry T Sirls; Kim A Killinger; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Judith A Boura; Melissa C Fischer; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Colporrhaphy compared with mesh or graft-reinforced vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shawn A Menefee; Keisha Y Dyer; Emily S Lukacz; Amanda J Simsiman; Karl M Luber; John N Nguyen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

4.  Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Christian Falconer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Sexual function in women before and after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Loïc Sentilhes; Aurélien Berthier; Fabrice Sergent; Eric Verspyck; Philippe Descamps; Loïc Marpeau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

Review 7.  Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Rebecca G Rogers; Joseph I Schaffer; Ethan M Balk; Katrin Uhlig; Joseph Lau; Husam Abed; Thomas L Wheeler; Michelle Y Morrill; Jeffrey L Clemons; David D Rahn; James C Lukban; Lior Lowenstein; Kimberly Kenton; Stephen B Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Abdel-Fattah; I Ramsay
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)--a case series multicentric study.

Authors:  B Fatton; J Amblard; P Debodinance; M Cosson; B Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-28

10.  Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Carey; P Higgs; J Goh; J Lim; A Leong; H Krause; A Cornish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary?

Authors:  Gillian F Wolff; J Christian Winters; Ryan M Krlin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.

Authors:  Dobrochna Globerman; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Making surgery safer through adequate communication with the stakeholders: vaginal slings.

Authors:  Sandra Elmer; Janelle Brennan; Rebecca Mathieson; Briony Norris; Marcus Carey; Caroline Dowling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States.

Authors:  Shilpa Iyer; Sylvia M Botros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Tomi S Mikkola; Karl Möller Bek; Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo; Jonas Gunnarsson; Marie Ellström Engh; Christian Falconer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eoin MacCraith; Eoghan M Cunnane; Michael Joyce; James C Forde; Fergal J O'Brien; Niall F Davis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Mélanie Aubé; Marilyne Guérin; Caroline Rheaume; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Megumi Akiyama; Gayle Allenback; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Justin O Daly; Joanne Dean; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse in patients and their information-seeking preferences: comparing Vienna and Moscow.

Authors:  Polina Lyatoshinskaya; D Gumina; A Popov; M Koch; M Hagmann; W Umek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.