Literature DB >> 24519475

Feasibility of error-based electrotactile and auditive feedback in prosthetic walking.

Eva C Wentink1, Eline J Talsma-Kerkdijk2, Hans S Rietman2, Peter Veltink2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several studies have shown that feedback in upper-leg prostheses is possible, but slow or difficult to interpret. In this study, electrotactile and auditive error-based feedback, only giving feedback when an undesired event occurs, were tested for its use in upper-leg prosthesis when provided during a perturbation. TECHNIQUE: A total of nine healthy subjects walked on a prosthetic simulator which was disturbed at the end of the swing phase. They received either no feedback, electrotactile feedback, or auditive feedback at the time of the perturbation. DISCUSSION: The reaction time of the subjects only improved by 40 ms when using auditory feedback, compared to the no-feedback condition. No changes in reaction time were found in the electrotactile feedback condition. Considering perturbation detection was not taken into account in this study, this improvement is not enough for practical applications in upper-leg prosthesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many transfemoral amputees are insecure about their prosthesis, are afraid of falling, or actually fall. Providing feedback specifically during a perturbation may prevent them from falling, or at least give them a chance to react. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback; error-based; upper-leg prostheses

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519475     DOI: 10.1177/0309364613520319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  3 in total

1.  Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Julia Reh; Gerd Schmitz; Tong-Hun Hwang; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 2.  Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer - a review.

Authors:  Peter B Shull; Dana D Damian
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding.

Authors:  Jovana Malešević; Miloš Kostić; Fabricio A Jure; Erika G Spaich; Strahinja Došen; Vojin Ilić; Goran Bijelić; Matija Štrbac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.