Literature DB >> 24519402

Improving the prediction model used in risk equalization: cost and diagnostic information from multiple prior years.

S H C M van Veen1, R C van Kleef, W P M M van de Ven, R C J A van Vliet.   

Abstract

Currently-used risk-equalization models do not adequately compensate insurers for predictable differences in individuals' health care expenses. Consequently, insurers face incentives for risk rating and risk selection, both of which jeopardize affordability of coverage, accessibility to health care, and quality of care. This study explores to what extent the predictive performance of the prediction model used in risk equalization can be improved by using additional administrative information on costs and diagnoses from three prior years. We analyze data from 13.8 million individuals in the Netherlands in the period 2006-2009. First, we show that there is potential for improving models' predictive performance at both the population and subgroup level by extending them with risk adjusters based on cost and/or diagnostic information from multiple prior years. Second, we show that even these extended models do not adequately compensate insurers. By using these extended models incentives for risk rating and risk selection can be reduced substantially but not removed completely. The extent to which risk-equalization models can be improved in practice may differ across countries, depending on the availability of data, the method chosen to calculate risk-adjusted payments, the value judgment by the regulator about risk factors for which the model should and should not compensate insurers, and the trade-off between risk selection and efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519402     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0567-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  35 in total

1.  Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?

Authors:  W G Manning; J Mullahy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.

Authors:  Michael A Babyak
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Health-based risk adjustment Improving the pharmacy-based cost group model to reduce gaming possibilities.

Authors:  L M Lamers; R C J A Vliet
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2003

4.  Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data.

Authors:  Willard G Manning; Anirban Basu; John Mullahy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Risk-adjusted capitation payments: how well do principal inpatient diagnosis-based models work in the German situation? Results from a large data set.

Authors:  Corinne Behrend; Florian Buchner; Michael Happich; Rolf Holle; Peter Reitmeir; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-03

Review 6.  Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs.

Authors:  Borislava Mihaylova; Andrew Briggs; Anthony O'Hagan; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Principal inpatient diagnostic cost group model for Medicare risk adjustment.

Authors:  G C Pope; R P Ellis; A S Ash; C F Liu; J Z Ayanian; D W Bates; H Burstin; L I Iezzoni; M J Ingber
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2000

8.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

9.  Adjusted clinical groups: predictive accuracy for Medicaid enrollees in three states.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Janet M Bronstein; Cheryl Raskind-Hood
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2002
View more
  4 in total

1.  A method to simulate incentives for cost containment under various cost sharing designs: an application to a first-euro deductible and a doughnut hole.

Authors:  D Cattel; R C van Kleef; R C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-11-14

2.  Predicting Future Service Use in Dutch Mental Healthcare: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Kasper van Mens; Sascha Kwakernaak; Richard Janssen; Wiepke Cahn; Joran Lokkerbol; Bea Tiemens
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-08-31

3.  Comparing risk adjustment estimation methods under data availability constraints.

Authors:  Marica Iommi; Savannah Bergquist; Gianluca Fiorentini; Francesco Paolucci
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Improving risk equalization with constrained regression.

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; Thomas G McGuire; René C J A van Vliet; Wynand P P M van de Ven
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.