Literature DB >> 24519023

Enhancing the quality of protein conformation ensembles with relative populations.

Vijay Vammi1, Tu-Liang Lin, Guang Song.   

Abstract

The function and dynamics of many proteins are best understood not from a single structure but from an ensemble. A high quality ensemble is necessary for accurately delineating protein dynamics. However, conformations in an ensemble are generally given equal weights. Few attempts were made to assign relative populations to the conformations, mainly due to the lack of right experimental data. Here we propose a method for assigning relative populations to ensembles using experimental residue dipolar couplings (RDC) as constraints, and show that relative populations can significantly enhance an ensemble's ability in representing the native states and dynamics. The method works by identifying conformation states within an ensemble and assigning appropriate relative populations to them. Each of these conformation states is represented by a sub-ensemble consisting of a subset of the conformations. Application to the ubiquitin X-ray ensemble clearly identifies two key conformation states, with relative populations in excellent agreement with previous work. We then apply the method to a reprotonated ERNST ensemble that is enhanced with a switched conformation, and show that as a result of population reweighting, not only the reproduction of RDCs is significantly improved, but common conformational features (particularly the dihedral angle distributions of ϕ 53 and ψ 52) also emerge for both the X-ray ensemble and the reprotonated ERNST ensemble.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519023     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-014-9818-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  33 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

3.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules.

Authors:  Donald Hamelberg; John Mongan; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms.

Authors:  Jianyin Shao; Stephen W Tanner; Nephi Thompson; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Concordance of residual dipolar couplings, backbone order parameters and crystallographic B-factors for a small alpha/beta protein: a unified picture of high probability, fast atomic motions in proteins.

Authors:  G Marius Clore; Charles D Schwieters
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  A thorough dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in ubiquitin.

Authors:  Nils A Lakomek; Teresa Carlomagno; Stefan Becker; Christian Griesinger; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Self-consistent residual dipolar coupling based model-free analysis for the robust determination of nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics.

Authors:  Nils-Alexander Lakomek; Korvin F A Walter; Christophe Farès; Oliver F Lange; Bert L de Groot; Helmut Grubmüller; Rafael Brüschweiler; Axel Munk; Stefan Becker; Jens Meiler; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  The structure of human ubiquitin in 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol: a new conformational switch.

Authors:  Kuo Ying Huang; Gabriele A Amodeo; Liang Tong; Ann McDermott
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins.

Authors:  Barbara Richter; Joerg Gsponer; Péter Várnai; Xavier Salvatella; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ensembles of a small number of conformations with relative populations.

Authors:  Vijay Vammi; Guang Song
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Visualizing ensembles in structural biology.

Authors:  Ryan L Melvin; Freddie R Salsbury
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.518

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.