Kristen Lyall1, Rebecca J Schmidt, Irva Hertz-Picciotto. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, MIND (Medical Investigations of Neurodevelopmental Disorders) Institute, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past 10 years, research into environmental risk factors for autism has grown dramatically, bringing evidence that an array of non-genetic factors acting during the prenatal period may influence neurodevelopment. METHODS: This paper reviews the evidence on modifiable preconception and/or prenatal factors that have been associated, in some studies, with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including nutrition, substance use and exposure to environmental agents. This review is restricted to human studies with at least 50 cases of ASD, having a valid comparison group, conducted within the past decade and focusing on maternal lifestyle or environmental chemicals. RESULTS: Higher maternal intake of certain nutrients and supplements has been associated with reduction in ASD risk, with the strongest evidence for periconceptional folic acid supplements. Although many investigations have suggested no impact of maternal smoking and alcohol use on ASD, more rigorous exposure assessment is needed. A number of studies have demonstrated significant increases in ASD risk with estimated exposure to air pollution during the prenatal period, particularly for heavy metals and particulate matter. Little research has assessed other persistent and non-persistent organic pollutants in association with ASD specifically. CONCLUSIONS: More work is needed to examine fats, vitamins and other maternal nutrients, as well as endocrine-disrupting chemicals and pesticides, in association with ASD, given sound biological plausibility and evidence regarding other neurodevelopmental deficits. The field can be advanced by large-scale epidemiological studies, attention to critical aetiological windows and how these vary by exposure, and use of biomarkers and other means to understand underlying mechanisms.
BACKGROUND: Over the past 10 years, research into environmental risk factors for autism has grown dramatically, bringing evidence that an array of non-genetic factors acting during the prenatal period may influence neurodevelopment. METHODS: This paper reviews the evidence on modifiable preconception and/or prenatal factors that have been associated, in some studies, with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including nutrition, substance use and exposure to environmental agents. This review is restricted to human studies with at least 50 cases of ASD, having a valid comparison group, conducted within the past decade and focusing on maternal lifestyle or environmental chemicals. RESULTS: Higher maternal intake of certain nutrients and supplements has been associated with reduction in ASD risk, with the strongest evidence for periconceptional folic acid supplements. Although many investigations have suggested no impact of maternal smoking and alcohol use on ASD, more rigorous exposure assessment is needed. A number of studies have demonstrated significant increases in ASD risk with estimated exposure to air pollution during the prenatal period, particularly for heavy metals and particulate matter. Little research has assessed other persistent and non-persistent organic pollutants in association with ASD specifically. CONCLUSIONS: More work is needed to examine fats, vitamins and other maternal nutrients, as well as endocrine-disrupting chemicals and pesticides, in association with ASD, given sound biological plausibility and evidence regarding other neurodevelopmental deficits. The field can be advanced by large-scale epidemiological studies, attention to critical aetiological windows and how these vary by exposure, and use of biomarkers and other means to understand underlying mechanisms.
Authors: Virginia A Rauh; Frederica P Perera; Megan K Horton; Robin M Whyatt; Ravi Bansal; Xuejun Hao; Jun Liu; Dana Boyd Barr; Theodore A Slotkin; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sabine J Roza; Tamara van Batenburg-Eddes; Eric A P Steegers; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Johan P Mackenbach; Albert Hofman; Frank C Verhulst; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Simon G Gregory; Rebecca Anthopolos; Claire E Osgood; Chad A Grotegut; Marie Lynn Miranda Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Joan Newman; Mia V Gallo; Lawrence M Schell; Anthony P DeCaprio; Melinda Denham; Glenn D Deane Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Jonathan Chevrier; Robert B Gunier; Asa Bradman; Nina T Holland; Antonia M Calafat; Brenda Eskenazi; Kim G Harley Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Heejoo Jo; Sandrah P Eckel; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Myles Cockburn; Mayra P Martinez; Ting Chow; Frederick W Lurmann; William E Funk; Anny H Xiang; Rob McConnell Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Chantell Balaan; Michael J Corley; Tiffany Eulalio; Ka'ahukane Leite-Ahyo; Alina P S Pang; Rui Fang; Vedbar S Khadka; Alika K Maunakea; Monika A Ward Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Eman M Khaled; Nagwa A Meguid; Geir Bjørklund; Amr Gouda; Mohamed H Bahary; Adel Hashish; Nermin M Sallam; Salvatore Chirumbolo; Mona A El-Bana Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Cheryl K Walker; Paula Krakowiak; Alice Baker; Robin L Hansen; Sally Ozonoff; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 16.193