E Charles Osterberg1, Melissa A Laudano1, Ranjith Ramasamy1, Joshua Sterling2, Brian D Robinson3, Marc Goldstein1, Philip S Li1, Abigail S Haka2, Peter N Schlegel4. 1. Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 2. Department of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 3. Department of Pathology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 4. Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: pnschleg@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined whether Raman spectroscopy could identify spermatogenesis in a Sertoli-cell only rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partial Sertoli-cell only model was created using a testicular hypothermia-ischemia technique. Bilateral testis biopsy was performed in 4 rats. Raman spectra were acquired with a probe in 1 mm3 samples of testicular tissue. India ink was used to mark the site of spectral acquisition. Comparative histopathology was applied to verify whether Raman spectra were obtained from Sertoli-cell only tubules or seminiferous tubules with spermatogenesis. Principal component analysis and logistic regression were used to develop a mathematical model to evaluate the predictive accuracy of identifying tubules with spermatogenesis vs Sertoli-cell only tubules. RESULTS: Raman peak intensity changes were noted at 1,000 and 1,690 cm(-1) for tubules with spermatogenesis and Sertoli-cell only tubules, respectively. When principal components were used to predict whether seminferous tubules were Sertoli-cell only tubules or showed spermatogenesis, sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 100%, respectively. The ROC AUC to predict tubules with spermatogenesis with Raman spectroscopy was 0.98. CONCLUSIONS: Raman spectroscopy is capable of identifying seminiferous tubules with spermatogenesis in a Sertoli-cell only ex vivo rat model. Future ex vivo studies of human testicular tissue are necessary to confirm whether these findings can be translated to the clinical setting.
PURPOSE: We determined whether Raman spectroscopy could identify spermatogenesis in a Sertoli-cell only rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partial Sertoli-cell only model was created using a testicular hypothermia-ischemia technique. Bilateral testis biopsy was performed in 4 rats. Raman spectra were acquired with a probe in 1 mm3 samples of testicular tissue. India ink was used to mark the site of spectral acquisition. Comparative histopathology was applied to verify whether Raman spectra were obtained from Sertoli-cell only tubules or seminiferous tubules with spermatogenesis. Principal component analysis and logistic regression were used to develop a mathematical model to evaluate the predictive accuracy of identifying tubules with spermatogenesis vs Sertoli-cell only tubules. RESULTS: Raman peak intensity changes were noted at 1,000 and 1,690 cm(-1) for tubules with spermatogenesis and Sertoli-cell only tubules, respectively. When principal components were used to predict whether seminferous tubules were Sertoli-cell only tubules or showed spermatogenesis, sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 100%, respectively. The ROC AUC to predict tubules with spermatogenesis with Raman spectroscopy was 0.98. CONCLUSIONS: Raman spectroscopy is capable of identifying seminiferous tubules with spermatogenesis in a Sertoli-cell only ex vivo rat model. Future ex vivo studies of human testicular tissue are necessary to confirm whether these findings can be translated to the clinical setting.