Literature DB >> 24518716

Treatment and outcome in cancer cervix patients treated between 1979 and 1994: a single institutional experience.

Shyamkishore Shrivastava, Umesh Mahantshetty1, Reena Engineer, Hemant Tongaonkar, Jagadeesh Kulkarni, Ketayun Dinshaw.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A retrospective review in patients with carcinoma cervix to evaluate the changes and trends in demographics, evolution of protocols, and outcome analysis over 16 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 6234 patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with radical intent between 1979 and 1994. All the work-up, staging investigations, treatment details, radiation protocols, outcomes, and toxicities were noted, compiled, and analyzed.
RESULTS: With a mean age of 46 years (range: 18-90 years; median: 45 years), 669 (11%) patients were in stage Ib, 284 (5%) were in stage IIa, 1891 (30%) were in stage IIb, 69 (1%) were in stage IIIa, and 3321 (53%) were in stage IIIb. With a median follow-up of 68 months (57-79 months) for the entire group, there was no significant difference in the outcome of 953 patients with international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) Ib-IIa treated after radical surgery, pre-operative radiation therapy (pre-op RT) + Sx or after radical radiation; their disease-free survival (DFS) was 60-62% at 8 years. In our series of 1891 patients with stage IIb and 3321 with stage IIIb, a respective DFS of 56% and 40% was achieved at 8 years.
CONCLUSION: Over the last two decades, with the acquisition of newer facilities and inception of Joint Clinics, there has been a significant refinement in the treatment protocols and outcome. Improving radiation strategies to improve therapeutic ratio is the key to success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24518716     DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.126480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  16 in total

Review 1.  The COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications for Gynaecologic Cancer Care.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Seema Singhal
Journal:  Indian J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-24

2.  Cisplatin Chemoradiotherapy vs Radiotherapy in FIGO Stage IIIB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shyamkishore Shrivastava; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Engineer; Supriya Chopra; Rohini Hawaldar; Vinod Hande; Rajendra A Kerkar; Amita Maheshwari; T S Shylasree; Jaya Ghosh; Jyoti Bajpai; Lavanya Gurram; Seema Gulia; Sudeep Gupta
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Five-year survival and associated factors in women treated for cervical cancer at a reference hospital in the Brazilian Amazon.

Authors:  Saul Rassy Carneiro; Marcela de Araújo Fagundes; Pricila de Jesus Oliveira do Rosário; Laura Maria Tomazi Neves; Givago da Silva Souza; Maria da Conceição Nascimento Pinheiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Treatment of locally advanced carcinoma cervix with special emphasis on brachytherapy: A practice pattern survey among young radiation oncologist of India.

Authors:  Anis Bandyopadhyay; Poulami Basu; Kaushik Roy; Suman Das; Susovan Banerjee
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  IMRT, IGRT, and other high technology becomes standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?

Authors:  Jamema V Swamidas; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Gynecological cancers: A summary of published Indian data.

Authors:  Amita Maheshwari; Neha Kumar; Umesh Mahantshetty
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Sociodemographic and Clinical Profile of Cervical Cancer Patients Visiting in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Authors:  Aanchal Jain; Balasubramaniam Ganesh; Saurabh C Bobdey; Jignasa A Sathwara; Sushma Saoba
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Interfraction Dose Variations in Organs at Risk during CT-Based High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix: An Early Experience of a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Neelam Sharma; Manoj K Semwal; Abhishek Purkayastha
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance-Based Brachytherapy?

Authors:  Prachi Mittal; Supriya Chopra; Sidharth Pant; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Engineer; Jaya Ghosh; Sudeep Gupta; Yogesh Ghadi; Siji Menachery; Jamema Swamidas; Lavanya Gurram; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07

10.  A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sukriye Bilge Gursel; Alparslan Serarslan; Ahmet Deniz Meydan; Nilgun Okumus; Tenzile Yasayacak
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.