Literature DB >> 24517959

Phase II Trial of Target-guided Personalized Chemotherapy in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Antonio Cubillo1, Jesús Rodriguez-Pascual, Fernando López-Ríos, Carlos Plaza, Elena García, Rafael Álvarez, Emilio de Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Ovidio Hernando, Carmen Rubio, Sofía Perea, Gema Sanchez, Manuel Hidalgo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of personalizing treatment of patients with advanced untreated colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated metastatic CRC, performance status 0-1, and candidates for systemic chemotherapy were eligible. Tumor tissues were analyzed for KRAS, BRAF, and PI3K mutations and expression of topoisomerase-1 (Topo-1), excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), thymidylate synthase (TS), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Patients with Topo-1 expression received irinotecan, whereas patients with negative Topo-1 and ERCC1 expression received oxaliplatin. Otherwise, patients received physician's choice of treatment. If TS was positive, no fluoropyrimidine was administered and if negative, 5-flurorouracil if TP was negative, or capecitabine if TP was positive. KRAS-mutated patients were treated with bevacizumab, whereas KRAS-native received cetuximab. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were enrolled and 67 received personalized treatment including irinotecan (n=27), oxaliplatin (n=16), FOLFIRI (n=12), and FOLFOX (n=12). Thirty-eight patients received cetuximab and 29 bevacizumab. With a median follow-up time of 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-36), the overall median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-9.7), representing a 12-month PFS rate of 36.5% (95% CI, 25-48). Overall clinical benefit, including response rate and disease stabilization, was 86% (95% CI, 73%-97%). The overall median survival was 21 months (95% CI, 11-40).
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time target-guided personalized first-line treatment of patients with advanced CRC is feasible but, with the approached used, did not result in a clear improvement in PFS to warrant phase III testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24517959     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  William A Hammond; Abhisek Swaika; Kabir Mody
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Relationship Between Expression of Proteins ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with FOLFOX-Based Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ming-Yii Huang; Joh-Jong Huang; Chun-Ming Huang; Chih-Hung Lin; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Ching-Wen Huang; Chee-Yin Chai; Chia-Yang Lin; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Integrating TYMS, KRAS and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Ntavatzikos; Aris Spathis; Paul Patapis; Nikolaos Machairas; George Peros; Stefanos Konstantoudakis; Danai Leventakou; Ioannis G Panayiotides; Petros Karakitsos; Anna Koumarianou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.