Literature DB >> 24517882

Resource allocation to reproduction in animals.

Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman1, Konstadia Lika.   

Abstract

The standard Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) model assumes that a fraction κ of mobilised reserve is allocated to somatic maintenance plus growth, while the rest is allocated to maturity maintenance plus maturation (in embryos and juveniles) or reproduction (in adults). All DEB parameters have been estimated for 276 animal species from most large phyla and all chordate classes. The goodness of fit is generally excellent. We compared the estimated values of κ with those that would maximise reproduction in fully grown adults with abundant food. Only 13% of these species show a reproduction rate close to the maximum possible (assuming that κ can be controlled), another 4% have κ lower than the optimal value, and 83% have κ higher than the optimal value. Strong empirical support hence exists for the conclusion that reproduction is generally not maximised. We also compared the parameters of the wild chicken with those of races selected for meat and egg production and found that the latter indeed maximise reproduction in terms of κ, while surface-specific assimilation was not affected by selection. We suggest that small values of κ relate to the down-regulation of maximum body size, and large values to the down-regulation of reproduction. We briefly discuss the ecological context for these findings.
© 2014 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allocation to soma; animal reproduction; chicken egg production; dynamic energy budget; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24517882     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  8 in total

1.  Sensitivity of animals to chemical compounds links to metabolic rate.

Authors:  Jan Baas; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Variation in the reproductive strategy of a lichenized fungus along a climatic gradient.

Authors:  Sonia Merinero; Marcos Méndez; Gregorio Aragón; Isabel Martínez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context.

Authors:  Konstadia Lika; Starrlight Augustine; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The comparative energetics of the carnivorans and pangolins.

Authors:  Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman; Starrlight Augustine
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Integrating earthworm movement and life history through dynamic energy budgets.

Authors:  Andre Gergs; Kim Rakel; Dino Bussen; Yvan Capowiez; Gregor Ernst; Vanessa Roeben
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Energetic basis for bird ontogeny and egg-laying applied to the bobwhite quail.

Authors:  Nina Marn; Konstadia Lika; Starrlight Augustine; Benoit Goussen; Markus Ebeling; David Heckmann; Andre Gergs
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  A framework for testing assumptions about foraging scales, body mass, and niche separation using telemetry data.

Authors:  Graeme S Cumming; Dominic A W Henry; Chevonne Reynolds
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The AmP project: Comparing species on the basis of dynamic energy budget parameters.

Authors:  Gonçalo M Marques; Starrlight Augustine; Konstadia Lika; Laure Pecquerie; Tiago Domingos; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.