Literature DB >> 24517139

Chronotype, bed timing and total sleep time in seniors.

Timothy H Monk1, Daniel J Buysse.   

Abstract

Many older adults (seniors) experience problems with getting enough sleep. Because of the link between sleep and circadian rhythms, changes in bedtime lead to changes in the amount of sleep obtained. Although primarily determined genetically, chronotype changes with advancing age towards a more morning-type (M-type) orientation. In a 2006 study, we have found a linear relationship, by which the earlier a senior's bedtime, the more sleep she/he will obtain. The aim of this study was to see whether this relationship differs for M-type seniors, as compared to seniors outside the M-type category. Retired seniors (n = 954, 535 M, 410F, 65 years+, mean age 74.4 years) taking part in a telephone interview were divided into M-types and Other types (O-types) using the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM). The relationship between bedtime and Total Sleep Time (TST), and between rise-time and TST, was tested using linear regression separately for M-types and O-types. For each participant, habitual bedtime, rise-time and total Sleep Time (TST) [after removing time spent in unwanted wakefulness] were obtained using a telephone version of the Sleep Timing Questionnaire (STQ). Both chronotype groups showed a significant linear relationship between bedtime and TST (p < 0.001); with earlier bedtimes leading to more TST (M-type 5.6 min; O-type 4.4 min per 10 min change [slope difference p = 0.05]); and an opposite relationship between rise-time and TST with earlier rise-times leading to less TST (M-type 6.7 min; O-type 4.2 min per 10 min change [slope difference p = 0.001]). M-types retired to bed 56 min earlier (p < 0.001), awoke 93 min earlier (p < 0.001) and obtained 23 min less TST (p < 0.001) than O-types. In conclusion, both chronotypes showed TST to be related in a linear way to bedtime and rise-time; the overall shorter TST in M-types was due to them rising 93 min earlier, but only retiring to bed 56 min earlier than O-types; as well as having a steeper rise-time versus TST relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morningness; bedtime; circadian; elderly; sleep

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24517139      PMCID: PMC4088929          DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2014.885981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  38 in total

1.  Measuring sleep habits without using a diary: the sleep timing questionnaire.

Authors:  Timothy H Monk; Daniel J Buysse; Kathy S Kennedy; Jaime M Pods; Jean M DeGrazia; Jean M Miewald
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J A Horne; O Ostberg
Journal:  Int J Chronobiol       Date:  1976

3.  Circadian characteristics of healthy 80-year-olds and their relationship to objectively recorded sleep.

Authors:  T H Monk; C F Reynolds; D J Buysse; C C Hoch; D B Jarrett; J R Jennings; D J Kupfer
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-09

4.  Evening preference is related to the incidence of depressive states independent of sleep-wake conditions.

Authors:  Shingo Kitamura; Akiko Hida; Makiko Watanabe; Minori Enomoto; Sayaka Aritake-Okada; Yoshiya Moriguchi; Yuichi Kamei; Kazuo Mishima
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  A diurnal type scale. Construction, consistency and validation in shift work.

Authors:  L Torsvall; T Akerstedt
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  A two process model of sleep regulation.

Authors:  A A Borbély
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1982

7.  Timing, Duration and Quality of sleep, and Level of Daytime sleepiness in 1166 Retired seniors.

Authors:  Timothy H Monk; Daniel J Buysse; Janet E Schlarb; Scott R Beach
Journal:  Healthy Aging Clin Care Elder       Date:  2012-11-21

Review 8.  Aging human circadian rhythms: conventional wisdom may not always be right.

Authors:  Timothy H Monk
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.182

9.  A prospective study of weight gain associated with chronotype among college freshmen.

Authors:  Elizabeth Culnan; Jacqueline D Kloss; Michael Grandner
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Morningness-eveningness, sex, and the Alternative Five Factor Model of personality.

Authors:  Anna Muro; Montserrat Gomà-i-Freixanet; Ana Adan
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.877

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Circadian Rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorders in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Kim; Alexandria R Elkhadem; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2022-06

2.  Gaining Insights Into the Estimation of the Circadian Rhythms of Social Activity in Older Adults From Their Telephone Call Activity With Statistical Learning: Observational Study.

Authors:  Timothée Aubourg; Jacques Demongeot; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Time-of-day effects on eyewitness reports in morning and evening types.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Exploitation of Outgoing and Incoming Telephone Calls in the Context of Circadian Rhythms of Social Activity Among Elderly People: Observational Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Timothée Aubourg; Jacques Demongeot; Hervé Provost; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Validation of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire in Korean Older Adults.

Authors:  Hyera Ryu; Eun Yeon Joo; Su Jung Choi; Sooyeon Suh
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.505

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.