OBJECTIVES: Rates of preventive asthma care after an asthma emergency department (ED) visit are low among inner-city children. The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of a clinician and caregiver feedback intervention (INT) on improving preventive asthma care following an asthma ED visit compared to an attention control group (CON). METHODS:Children with persistent asthma and recent asthma ED visits (N = 300) were enrolled and randomized into a feedback intervention or an attention control group and followed for 12 months. All children received nurse visits. Data were obtained from interviews, child salivary cotinine levels and pharmacy records. Standard t-test, chi-square and multiple logistic regression tests were used to test for differences between the groups for reporting greater than or equal to two primary care provider (PCP) preventive care visits for asthma over 12 months. RESULTS:Children were primarily male, young (3-5 years), African American and Medicaid insured. Mean ED visits over 12 months was high (2.29 visits). No difference by group was noted for attending two or more PCP visits/12 months or having an asthma action plan (AAP). Children having an AAP at baseline were almost twice as likely to attend two or more PCP visits over 12 months while controlling for asthma control, group status, child age and number of asthma ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: A clinician and caregiver feedback intervention was unsuccessful in increasing asthma preventive care compared to an attention control group. Further research is needed to develop interventions to effectively prevent morbidity in high risk inner-city children with frequent ED utilization.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Rates of preventive asthma care after an asthma emergency department (ED) visit are low among inner-city children. The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of a clinician and caregiver feedback intervention (INT) on improving preventive asthma care following an asthma ED visit compared to an attention control group (CON). METHODS:Children with persistent asthma and recent asthma ED visits (N = 300) were enrolled and randomized into a feedback intervention or an attention control group and followed for 12 months. All children received nurse visits. Data were obtained from interviews, child salivary cotinine levels and pharmacy records. Standard t-test, chi-square and multiple logistic regression tests were used to test for differences between the groups for reporting greater than or equal to two primary care provider (PCP) preventive care visits for asthma over 12 months. RESULTS:Children were primarily male, young (3-5 years), African American and Medicaid insured. Mean ED visits over 12 months was high (2.29 visits). No difference by group was noted for attending two or more PCP visits/12 months or having an asthma action plan (AAP). Children having an AAP at baseline were almost twice as likely to attend two or more PCP visits over 12 months while controlling for asthma control, group status, child age and number of asthma ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: A clinician and caregiver feedback intervention was unsuccessful in increasing asthma preventive care compared to an attention control group. Further research is needed to develop interventions to effectively prevent morbidity in high risk inner-city children with frequent ED utilization.
Authors: Jill S Halterman; Susan Fisher; Kelly M Conn; Maria Fagnano; Kathleen Lynch; Andrew Marky; Peter G Szilagyi Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2006-10
Authors: Arlene M Butz; Mona Tsoukleris; Michele Donithan; Van Doren Hsu; Kim Mudd; Ilene H Zuckerman; Mary E Bollinger Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Arlene M Butz; Patrick Breysse; Cynthia Rand; Jean Curtin-Brosnan; Peyton Eggleston; Gregory B Diette; D'Ann Williams; John T Bernert; Elizabeth C Matsui Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2011-05
Authors: Francine M Ducharme; Roger L Zemek; Dominic Chalut; David McGillivray; Francisco J D Noya; Sandy Resendes; Lyudmyla Khomenko; Rachel Rouleau; Xun Zhang Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Michael Schatz; Robert S Zeiger; William M Vollmer; David Mosen; Guillermo Mendoza; Andrea J Apter; Thomas B Stibolt; Albin Leong; Michael S Johnson; E Francis Cook Journal: Chest Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Paula Karnick; Helen Margellos-Anast; Gloria Seals; Steve Whitman; Gabriel Aljadeff; Daniel Johnson Journal: J Asthma Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Rajesh Kumar; Laura Marie Curtis; Sanjay Khiani; James Moy; Madeleine U Shalowitz; Lisa Sharp; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; John Jay Shannon; Kevin B Weiss Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Melissa H Bellin; Philip Osteen; Joan Kub; Mary E Bollinger; Mona Tsoukleris; Laurie Chaikind; Arlene M Butz Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Barbara P Yawn; Peter C Wollan; Matthew A Rank; Susan L Bertram; Young Juhn; Wilson Pace Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Lara J Akinbami; Paivi M Salo; Michelle M Cloutier; Jesse C Wilkerson; Kurtis S Elward; Jacek M Mazurek; Sonja Williams; Darryl C Zeldin Journal: J Asthma Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Melissa H Bellin; Kathryn S Collins; Philip Osteen; Joan Kub; Mary Elizabeth Bollinger; Angelica Newsome; Cassie Lewis-Land; Arlene M Butz Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Andrea Fidler; Rachel Sweenie; Adrian Ortega; Christopher C Cushing; Rachelle Ramsey; David Fedele Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2021-10-18