Literature DB >> 24516879

Pharmacokinetics of oral vitamin D(3) and calcifediol.

Alexander Jetter, Andreas Egli, Bess Dawson-Hughes, Hannes B Staehelin, Elisabeth Stoecklin, Richard Goessl, Jana Henschkowski, Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari.   

Abstract

AIM: Long-term pharmacokinetics after supplementation with vitamin D3 or calcifediol (the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 metabolite) is not well studied. Additionally, it is unclear whether bolus doses of vitamin D3 or calcifediol lead to 25(OH)D3 plasma concentrations considered desirable for fracture prevention (30 ng/mL). We therefore investigated plasma pharmacokinetics of 25(OH)D3 during different vitamin D3 and calcifediol supplementation regimens.
METHODS: In this seven-arm, randomized, double-blind, controlled parallel-group study, 35 healthy females aged 50–70 years (5 per group) received 20 μg calcifediol or vitamin D(3) daily, 140 μg calcifediol or vitamin D(3) weekly, for 15 weeks, or a single bolus of either 140 μg calcifediol, or vitamin D(3), or both. 25(OH)D3 plasma concentrations were quantified using LC–MS/MS in 14 clinical visits among all participants.
RESULTS: For daily (weekly) dosing, the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC0–24h), which is the measure for exposure, was 28% (67%) higher after the first dose of calcifediol than after the first dose of vitamin D3. After 15 weeks, this difference was 123% (178%). All women in the daily and weekly calcifediol groups achieved 25(OH)D3 concentrations > 30 ng/mL (mean, 16.8 days), but only 70% in the vitamin D3 daily or weekly groups reached this concentration (mean, 68.4 days). A single dose of 140 μg calcifediol led to 117% higher 25(OH)D3 AUC0–96h values than 140 μg vitamin D3, while the simultaneous intake of both did not further increase exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Calcifediol given daily, weekly, or as a single bolus is about 2–3 times more potent in increasing plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations than vitamin D3. Plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations of 30 ng/mL were reached more rapidly and reliably with calcifediol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24516879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Calcifediol versus vitamin D3 effects on gait speed and trunk sway in young postmenopausal women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  O Meyer; B Dawson-Hughes; E Sidelnikov; A Egli; D Grob; H B Staehelin; G Theiler; R W Kressig; H P Simmen; R Theiler; H A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The clinical use of vitamin D metabolites and their potential developments: a position statement from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Claudio Cricelli; John A Kanis; Ranuccio Nuti; Jean-Y Reginster; Johann D Ringe; Rene Rizzoli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Ocular Pharmacokinetics of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 After Weekly Supplementation in Rabbits Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Archit Kumar; Mini P Singh; Tripti Rungta; Ajay Patial; Savita Verma Attri; Bikash Medhi; Radha Kanta Ratho
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Correction of vitamin D status by calcidiol: pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and biochemical effects on bone and mineral metabolism of daily and weekly dosage regimens.

Authors:  S Minisola; L Cianferotti; P Biondi; C Cipriani; C Fossi; F Franceschelli; F Giusti; G Leoncini; J Pepe; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Interpreting vitamin D assay results: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Glenville Jones
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Vitamin D supplementation: when and how?

Authors:  Elisabetta Romagnoli; Vincenzo Carnevale; Piergianni Biondi; Salvatore Minisola
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Update on pharmacologically-relevant vitamin D analogues.

Authors:  Glenville Jones; Martin Kaufmann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Interlaboratory Trial for Measurement of Vitamin D and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in Foods and a Dietary Supplement Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Janet Maxwell Roseland; Kristine Y Patterson; Karen W Andrews; Katherine M Phillips; Melissa M Phillips; Pamela R Pehrsson; Guy L Dufresne; Jette Jakobsen; Pavel A Gusev; Sushma Savarala; Quynhanh V Nguyen; Andrew J Makowski; Chad R Scheuerell; Guillaume P Larouche; Stephen A Wise; James M Harnly; Juhi R Williams; Joseph M Betz; Christine L Taylor
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 9.  Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?

Authors:  J M Quesada-Gomez; R Bouillon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Safety of calcidiol monohydrate produced by chemical synthesis as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan De Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; John Kearney; Alexandre Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Marco Vinceti; Francesco Cubadda; Thomas Frenzel; Marina Heinonen; Rosangela Marchelli; Monika Neuhauser-Berthold; Morten Poulsen; Miguel Prieto Maradona; Josef Rudolf Schlatter; Henk van Loveren; Céline Dumas; Ruth Roldán-Torres; Hans Steinkellner; Helle Katrine Knutsen
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.