Andrea Walters1, Mary-Anne Lea2, John van den Hoff3, Iain C Field4, Patti Virtue1, Sergei Sokolov5, Matt H Pinkerton6, Mark A Hindell1. 1. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia ; Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 2. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 3. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia. 4. Marine Mammal Research Group, Department of Environment and Geography, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 6. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Kilbernie, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
Development in foraging behaviour and dietary intake of many vertebrates are age-structured. Differences in feeding ecology may correlate with ontogenetic shifts in dispersal patterns, and therefore affect foraging habitat and resource utilization. Such life-history traits have important implications in interpreting tropho-dynamic linkages. Stable isotope ratios in the whiskers of sub-yearling southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina; n = 12) were used, in conjunction with satellite telemetry and environmental data, to examine their foraging habitat and diet during their first foraging migration. The trophic position of seals from Macquarie Island (54°30'S, 158°57'E) was estimated using stable carbon (δ(1) (3)C) and nitrogen (δ(15)N) ratios along the length of the whisker, which provided a temporal record of prey intake. Satellite-relayed data loggers provided details on seal movement patterns, which were related to isotopic concentrations along the whisker. Animals fed in waters south of the Polar Front (>60°S) or within Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) Statistical Subareas 88.1 and 88.2, as indicated by both their depleted δ(1) (3)C (<-20‰) values, and tracking data. They predominantly exploited varying proportions of mesopelagic fish and squid, and crustaceans, such as euphausiids, which have not been reported as a prey item for this species. Comparison of isotopic data between sub-yearlings, and 1, 2 and 3 yr olds indicated that sub-yearlings, limited by their size, dive capabilities and prey capture skills to feeding higher in the water column, fed at a lower trophic level than older seals. This is consistent with the consumption of euphausiids and most probably, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), which constitute an abundant, easily accessible source of prey in water masses used by this age class of seals. Isotopic assessment and concurrent tracking of seals are successfully used here to identify ontogenetic shifts in broad-scale foraging habitat use and diet preferences in a highly migratory predator.
Development in foraging behaviour and dietary intake of many vertebrates are age-structured. Differences in feeding ecology may correlate with ontogenetic shifts in dispersal patterns, and therefore affect foraging habitat and resource utilization. Such life-history traits have important implications in interpreting tropho-dynamic linkages. Stable isotope ratios in the whiskers of sub-yearling southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina; n = 12) were used, in conjunction with satellite telemetry and environmental data, to examine their foraging habitat and diet during their first foraging migration. The trophic position of seals from Macquarie Island (54°30'S, 158°57'E) was estimated using stable carbon (δ(1) (3)C) and nitrogen (δ(15)N) ratios along the length of the whisker, which provided a temporal record of prey intake. Satellite-relayed data loggers provided details on seal movement patterns, which were related to isotopic concentrations along the whisker. Animals fed in waters south of the Polar Front (>60°S) or within Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) Statistical Subareas 88.1 and 88.2, as indicated by both their depleted δ(1) (3)C (<-20‰) values, and tracking data. They predominantly exploited varying proportions of mesopelagic fish and squid, and crustaceans, such as euphausiids, which have not been reported as a prey item for this species. Comparison of isotopic data between sub-yearlings, and 1, 2 and 3 yr olds indicated that sub-yearlings, limited by their size, dive capabilities and prey capture skills to feeding higher in the water column, fed at a lower trophic level than older seals. This is consistent with the consumption of euphausiids and most probably, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), which constitute an abundant, easily accessible source of prey in water masses used by this age class of seals. Isotopic assessment and concurrent tracking of seals are successfully used here to identify ontogenetic shifts in broad-scale foraging habitat use and diet preferences in a highly migratory predator.
The interplay between the physical and biological regimes of the Southern Ocean [1] dictates the dispersal, foraging
habitats and diet of higher order predators [2]. Information on diet is fundamental to better understand the diversity of
linkages within Southern Ocean marine ecosystems and the response of higher order predators to
large-scale ecosystem change and other anthropogenic activities such as commercial fishing [3]. Due to their marine existence, the
dietary study of marine mammals is one of the most challenging of any vertebrate taxon [4]. Moreover, marine mammal species
often exhibit ontogenetic shifts in dispersal patterns, foraging habitat and resource utilisation
[5]. Such life-history traits have
important individual and population level implications and must be taken into account when assessing
the diet and trophic interactions of a species within an ecosystem.Natal dispersal is a fundamental, but poorly understood, demographic parameter [6], particularly amongst vertebrate
marine predators [7]. The
mechanism which governs this phenomenon is largely unknown [8], although intra-specific competition for resources
(e.g. food, space and mates) is one of the main hypothesises advanced to explain
natal dispersal in the life history of most species [9].The southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) is such an example of a polar
species which exhibits an extreme natal dispersal strategy [10]. At weaning, adult female seals depart for
remote feeding grounds, leaving pups to spend another three to eight weeks ashore before they too
depart natal colonies [11], [12]. The lack of maternal input into
dispersal strategies means the likelihood of these young animals foraging successfully, in an
unfamiliar ocean environment, is largely dependent on chance. Consequently, this may contribute to
the relatively high first year mortality in this species [13].Surviving seals disperse over many thousands of kilometres [14] to access different prey communities [15], and seem to develop site
fidelity to areas known to previously provide good feeding [16]. This behaviour is also noted for their northern
counterpart, the northern elephant seal (M. angustirostris) [17]. Dispersal patterns may correlate with increased
intra-specific competition for resources, physiological capabilities (e.g. related
to size, sex, diving capacity), familiarity with habitat, temporal shifts in haul-out behaviour and
reduced mortality risks of extensive movement [5], [14], [18]. Adult females from Macquarie
Island, constrained by breeding requirements, make directed movements south of the major Antarctic
Circumpolar Current (ACC) fronts to feed over the East Antarctic continental shelf before the winter
sea ice makes this habitat inaccessible [19]. In contrast, younger seals, constrained by physiological capabilities [20], make less directed travel,
predominantly north of the southern limits of the ACC, closer to their natal island [10], [14], [21].What is known about the diet of this species stems largely from studies of stomach contents and
faecal analysis [5], [22], [23], but interpretation is impeded by the wide
separation between feeding and haul-out sites [24]. Stable isotope analysis, which assesses ratios of carbon
(13C/12C; δ13C) and nitrogen (15N/14N;
δ15N) isotopes in various body tissues, is being increasingly used to study the
foraging habitat and trophic position of highly migratory animals [25], [26], [27],
[28], [29] as it can yield a data time-series derived from
assimilated, and not just ingested food [30].Carbon (e.g.
13C) concentrations change by only ∼0.8 to 2‰ per trophic level, reflecting
the source of carbon at the base of the food chain [31], [32] and
thus consumer’s foraging habitat. Nitrogen (e.g.
15N) concentrations in consumer tissues typically increase at ∼3‰ per trophic
level [33], [34] rendering them particularly
useful in estimating prey trophic position [35]. As whiskers are keratin-based tissues, which are metabolically inert after
synthesis [26], they
approximate a time-line of stable isotope values derived from food sources, with the tip of the
whisker representing the oldest growth, and the root the most recent growth [36].In this study, stable isotope and satellite telemetry for consumers and corresponding
environmental data are combined to quantify the feeding habits and trophic position of sub-yearling
elephant seals in relation to habitat during their first feeding migration from Macquarie Island.
The specific aims of this study were to determine: 1) the growth rates of whiskers of sub-yearlings
in the six months after weaning, and 2) the trophic position (i.e.
δ13C and δ15N) of seals in relation to foraging location, water mass
type and seal age.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Animals in this study were cared for in accordance with the guidelines of the University of
Tasmania Animals Ethics Committee that approved the fieldwork (Permit no. A0006738, M. Hindell).
Data Collection
Seal whiskers
Facial vibrissae (whiskers) were collected from southern elephant seal pups equipped with
Satellite Relayed Data Loggers (SRDLs, Sea Mammal Research Unit, St Andrews, UK), which consisted of
a data logger interfaced to a 0.5-W Argos radio frequency unit [37]. Satellite Relayed Data Loggers were fitted to pups
during their post-weaning fast at Macquarie Island (54°30′S, 158°57′E) in
December 1995 (n = 6) and 1999 (n = 6). A six hour record
was summarized and transmitted. One whisker was collected from each individual at SRDL deployment
(pre-trip whisker; 1995 only, n = 5) and a second whisker was collected when
the SRDL was retrieved approximately 4 to 7 months later (post-trip whisker;
n = 12; Table 1). All
animals were sampled within 7 days of their return (mean = 3.1±2.5 days,
n = 12). Whiskers were not plucked but cut as close to the face as possible
from the same location on the left hand side of the muzzle (C.R. McMahon, Personal communication).
Details of the capture, handling and attachment of telemetry devices to study animals are provided
elsewhere [38], [39], [40].
Table 1
Morphometric, tag deployment and tracking details for 12 weaned southern elephant seals from
Macquarie Island, including the number of days (mean±SD) spent in transit and Area Restricted
Search (ARS) by seals.
Seal IDNo.
Sex
WeaningMass (Kg)
DeploymentMass (Kg)
Transit duration(days)
ARS duration(days)
Total duration(days)
1995/1996
J226
F
78.0
62.0
47.0
70.0
126.0
J263
M
143.0
107.0
45.0
86.0
149.0
J373
F
92.0
73.0
56.0
66.0
130.0
J375
F
89.0
68.0
12.0
62.0
146.0
J492
F
88.0
62.0
50.0
72.0
148.0
J503
M
92.0
66.0
46.0
81.0
137.0
Mean
97.0±23.1
73.0±17.2
42.7±15.5
72.8±9.0
139.3±9.8
1999/2000
T719
F
195.0
123.0
42.0
108.0
178.0
T825
F
104.0
96.0
57.0
105.0
182.0
T839
F
101.0
71.0
56.0
79.0
139.0
T867
F
90.0
62.0
50.0
95.0
179.0
T875
F
85.0
60.0
76.0
62.0
155.0
T887
F
93.0
70.0
63.0
94.0
169.0
Mean
111.3±41.6
80.3±24.5
57.3±11.6
90.5±17.3
167.0±16.9
Overall mean
104.2±32.9
76.7±20.5
50.0±15.1
81.7±16.1
153.2±19.5
Prey specimens
In the absence of available prey stable isotope data for this region of the Southern Ocean we
used published and unpublished values corresponding to latitudinal ranges similar to this population
of juvenile southern elephant seals, although outside the current foraging range. We have assumed
that despite the geographic disparity, the prey isotope values will be broadly consistent with those
within the seals foraging areas. Mid-latitude (<55°S) specimens of fish
(Protomyctophum tenisoni, n = 8; Electrona
antarctica, n = 10; Gymnoscopelus piabilis,
n = 2; G. nicholsi, n = 10 and G.
fraseri, n = 8) were collected by the RV La Curieuse
during bathypelagic trawls, to the northeast of the Kerguelen Archipelago (49°07′S,
70°45′E) in June 1998 (see [41]). The samples were collected at night using an IYGPT net (International Young
Gadoid Pelagic Trawl net; opening: 12×7 m) with a 10 mm mesh size in the cod end [42], and were sorted on deck and
frozen. Lower beaks of two squid species (Martialia hyadesi,
n = 66 and Histioteuthis eltaninae,
n = 71) were obtained from the stomach contents of juvenile southernelephants
seals (one, two and three year olds) during their annual haul-out periods as they returned ashore at
Macquarie Island (54°30′S, 158°57′E), from November 1997 and December 2000
(Hughes, A.R. unpubl. data). Details of the capture, handling and stomach lavaging of study animals
are provided elsewhere [5], [43], [44]. The filtered stomach contents were stored in
70% ethanol.High latitude (>60°S) specimens of fish (E. antarctica,
n = 10), euphausiids (Euphausia triacantha,
n = 10), hyperiid amphipods (Themisto gaudichaudii,
n = 7) and squid (Bathyteuthis abysicola,
n = 2 and Psychroteuthis glacialis,
n = 3) were collected by the Japanese TRV Umitaka Maru using
pelagic trawls in the Dumont d’Urville Sea, ranging from Terre Adélie to the Mertz
Glacier tongue, in George V Land (61°45′ to 67°30′S, 140° to 143°E) as
part of the Collaborative East Antarctic Marine Census (CEAMARC) in January/February 2008 [45], [46]. Samples were collected at night and day using an
IYGPT net (opening: 5.5×12 m) with a mesh of 100 mm in the front, then tapering through 80 mm
to 40 mm to 20 mm to 10 mm mesh in the cod end and were sorted on deck and frozen. Samples were
stored at −80°C until analysis.
Foraging Habitat
We fitted a first-difference correlated random walk switching (DCRWS) model [47] incorporating Argos error to elephant seal
satellite location data originating and terminating at Macquarie Island
(n = 14). Using 360 minute time step intervals, the model indexed movement
parameters (differences in latitude and longitude between consecutive positions along the track)
according to two behavioural modes [48]; transit and Area Restricted Search (ARS) modes. Area Restricted Search
corresponded to periods of reduced travel speed and increased turning rate (parameter estimates
between 1.8 and 2.0), which are more likely to be associated with foraging movements as opposed to
transit movement (parameter estimates between 1.0 and 1.2) [48]. Locations which did not fit these criteria
(i.e. parameter estimates between 1.2 and 1.8; 14.2% of all locations at
sea) were discarded. The methodology used to fit the model to elephant seal location data is
described in detail in Jonsen et al. [49].Using the ARS locations, we calculated the proportion (%) of time spent by the seals in
defined ACC Inter-Frontal Zones (IFZs). To map the position of ACC fronts, we used 19 years (1992 to
2011) of weekly sea surface height (SSH) gradients. The approach used to identify fronts in SSH data
is described in detail by Sokolov and Rintoul [50], [51],
[52] and summarized briefly
here.To map fronts in the Southern Ocean, twelve SSH contours were used, as in Sokolov and Rintoul
[51]. Of these, nine contours are
associated with the ACC itself and three contours correspond to elevated SSH gradients associated
with subtropical western boundary currents and their extension along the northern edge of the
Southern Ocean. The ACC front positions inferred from satellite SSH maps were validated using
independent data from Argo floats and high resolution hydrographic sections as described in detail
in Sokolov and Rintoul [50],
[51].Each elephant seal satellite location was ascribed to an IFZ [50], [51], [53]
defined as: (1) south of sBdy, (2) sBdy to SACCF-S, (3) SACCF-S to SACCF-N, (4) SACCF-N to PF-S, (5)
PF-S to PF, (6) PF to PF-N, (7) PF-N to SAF-S, (8) SAF-S to SAF, (9) SAF to SAF-N, (10) SAF-N to
SAZ, (11) SAZ to STZ-S, (12) STZ-S to STZ-N and (13) N STZ-N, where sBdy: southern Boundary Current;
ACC: Antarctic Circumpolar Current; N: north; S: south; PF: Polar Front; SAF: sub-Antarctic Front;
SAZ: sub-Antarctic Zone and STZ: sub-Tropical Zone.These IFZs were summarised into seven distinct zones as follows: 1. S of SACCF-S (IFZ 1,2); 2.
ACC to PF-S (IFZ 3,4); 3. PF (IFZ 5,6); 4. PF to SAF (IFZ 7); 5. SAF (IFZ 8,9); 6. SAF-N to SAZ (IFZ
10), and 7. SAZ to STZ-S (IFZ 11). Numbers in brackets correspond to IFZs above.
Sample Preparation and Stable Isotope Analysis
The whiskers were cleaned with successive rinses in a 2∶1 chloroform:methanol solution, and
then dried in an oven at 60°C for 72 hours. The twelve post-trip whiskers were weighed and
sectioned into approximately 2 mm sections. The sections from each whisker were numbered
sequentially, starting from the base, in order to track the temporal integration of isotope values
along the length of the whisker.Isotopic analysis was performed on the white muscle of fish, the mantle and lower beaks of squid,
and whole specimens of amphipods and euphausiids. Muscle tissues (fish and squid) and whole
specimens were freeze dried and ground to fine powder before lipids were removed from all samples
[54], and carbonates were
removed from amphipod and euphausiid samples [55]. Different ratios of chitin (a 15N-depleted molecule) to protein
are found in undarkened, darkening and darkened parts of squid beaks, with much more chitin in
undarkened than in darkened parts [56], [57].
Consequently, the darkened wings of lower beaks are less impoverished in 15N relative to
diet and were therefore used for stable isotope analysis. The lower beaks of squid were cleaned with
successive rinses of distilled water, before the wing parts of beaks were cut away using scissors.
Wings of lower beaks were then dried in oven at 60°C for a minimum of 16 hours and ground to
fine powder. Relative abundance of 13C and 15N were determined using an
Isoprime (Micromass, UK) continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometer. Results are reported using
standard δ notation in parts per thousand (‰) relative to Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) for
δ13C and atmospheric N2 (Air) for δ15N as
follows:where δX is δ13C or
δ15N, and R is the ratio of 13C/12C or
15N/14N.Replicate measurements of internal laboratory standards (Alanine) indicate measurement errors
<0.20 ‰ and <0.21 ‰ for δ13C and δ15N,
respectively. Stable isotope analysis was performed by the Environmental Biology Group, Research
School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia.
Whisker Growth Dynamics and Isotopic Values of Sub-yearlings
Southern elephant seals undergo a 24 day lactation period [58] in which post-partum pup growth is fuelled
exclusively by energy from stored reserves in fasting mothers [12]. Isotope values along the length of a pre-trip
whisker are therefore derived from in-utero development and post-partum, while
isotopic values in the post-trip whisker reflect a shift from maternal investment to independent
foraging. As pups mature, the process of weaning leads to a change in isotopic signal when the
assimilation of carbon and nitrogen shifts to sources other than mother’s milk, such as
free-ranging prey [59], [60], [61] and/or energy stores (fasting) post-weaning and
pre-departure [11]. Thus, weaning
essentially represents a change in trophic level from mother’s milk (higher trophic level) to
free ranging prey (lower trophic level).To identify which part of the post-trip whisker reflected independent foraging at sea, we
therefore compared δ15N values along the length of the post-trip whisker to the basal
section of the pre-trip whisker (containing the isotopic signal of in-utero
development and post-partum; red symbol, Fig.
1). The horizontal solid line indicates where the pre-trip basal segment intercepts the
δ15N values along the length of the post-trip whisker (10.8‰). Note that the
point of interception occurs during the drop of 3.9‰ in δ15N from 12.4 to
8.5‰, which we interpret as a trophic level shift from mother’s milk and/or fasting to
independent foraging at sea. Once the lowest δ15N is reached (i.e.
the transition is complete), we consider this and all subsequent samples to represent amino acids
derived from independent foraging. The proportion (mm) of post-trip whisker that represents
δ15N values incorporated during independent foraging at sea is 14 mm (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
A schematic plot used to determine the shift to independent foraging along the post-trip
whisker.
We used stable nitrogen isotope values incorporated along the temporal span of the whisker as
represented by the growth of the whisker from the distal (tip; oldest isotopic information) to
proximal region (closest to the skin; most recent isotopic information). The red line indicates
where the pre-trip basal segment (red symbol) intercepts δ15N values along the length
of whisker. Solid arrows indicate the shift in food source along the temporal span from in
utero/lactation to lactation/fasting (black symbols) to independent foraging at sea (open
symbols). Dashed arrow indicates 3.9‰ drop in δ15N (equivalent to one trophic
level ∼3.0‰; grey symbols). The first 14 mm of whisker represents independent foraging at
sea.
A schematic plot used to determine the shift to independent foraging along the post-trip
whisker.
We used stable nitrogen isotope values incorporated along the temporal span of the whisker as
represented by the growth of the whisker from the distal (tip; oldest isotopic information) to
proximal region (closest to the skin; most recent isotopic information). The red line indicates
where the pre-trip basal segment (red symbol) intercepts δ15N values along the length
of whisker. Solid arrows indicate the shift in food source along the temporal span from in
utero/lactation to lactation/fasting (black symbols) to independent foraging at sea (open
symbols). Dashed arrow indicates 3.9‰ drop in δ15N (equivalent to one trophic
level ∼3.0‰; grey symbols). The first 14 mm of whisker represents independent foraging at
sea.
Variation in Habitat and Trophic Position (δ13C and δ15N) of
Seals with the Location of Foraging
Within the Southern Ocean, there is a well defined geographical δ13C gradient in
particulate organic matter (POM) surface waters, ranging from high δ13C values in
warm subtropical waters in the north, to depleted values in cold Antarctic waters in the south [62], [63], [64], [65], [66]. This is subsequently transferred to
higher levels within the food chain [67], [68]. In
order to relate isotopic signatures to foraging habitat we therefore took into account the
latitudinal gradient in tissue δ13C values of top predators in the Southern Ocean
[67], [68] and the location of the major oceanographic frontal
zones, e.g. SAF, PF and sBdy [53] of the Southern Ocean.The greatest proportion of seal ARS locations occurring in a particular IFZ defined their habitat
use. Isotopic signatures of elephant seals were then grouped according to habitat.
Inferred Prey Consumption during the First Six Months
We used δ13C and δ15N values of marine organisms from mid- and high
latitude Southern Ocean waters to infer the diet of elephant seals in relation to foraging habitat
([69], [70], [71], [72], this
study; Table S1). For
mid-latitude waters, we used a combination of pelagic fish (myctophids), squid and euphausiids from
waters located around the PF in the Indian and Atlantic Ocean sectors of the Southern Ocean.The beaks of two species of squid (M. hyadesi and H. eltaniane)
contained in stomach lavage samples of returning juvenile Macquarie Island southern elephant seals
were also examined (Hughes, A.R. unpubl. data). Cephalopod beak structure is species specific [73] and the lower beak rostral length
(LRL) can be used to estimate mantle length and mass of squid from allometric data [74]. To assess the size of squid
consumed by sub-yearlings we therefore used mean δ13C and δ15N values
of small, medium and large LRL sized beaks according to species (for details see Table S1).From high latitude waters (>60°S) north of Adélie and George V Land in the Indian
Ocean sector, we used myctophids (Electrona antarctica), euphausiids
(Euphausia triacantha) and amphipods (Themisto gaudichaudii)
sampled in pelagic waters at depths of <500 m (62 to 65°30′S, 140 to 143°E); the
deep-sea squid Bathyteuthis abysicola, sampled at depths of <1000 m (63°S,
140°E), and the glacial squid Psychroteuthis glacialis, sampled at depths of
<200 m in high latitude waters (65°30′S, 140°E). Values of Antarctic krill
(Euphausia superba) sorted from emperor penguin (Aptenodytes
forsteri) regurgitates from Adélie Land [71], and of pelagic squid from the northern Ross Sea
area in the Pacific Ocean sector, were also used [72].We used whisker-specific isotopic fractionation values for δ13C and
δ15N of 3.2‰ and 2.8‰, respectively, as obtained from a study of
captive pinnipeds [30], since
studies reporting the isotopic fractionation for δ13C and δ15N between
diet and whiskers for wild populations of elephant seals or other pinniped species are absent.
Correction factors of 3.2‰ and 2.8‰ were therefore applied to δ13C and
δ15N values, respectively, when comparing seal values to the isotopic values of
marine organisms. Cephalopod beaks are depleted in 15N, due to the presence of chitin (a
15N depleted molecule) and accordingly, contain lower δ15N values compared
to the mantle (∼3.5‰) and buccal mass (∼2.6‰) soft tissue of cephalopods [56]. A correction factor of 3.5‰
was therefore applied to the δ15N values of H. eltaninae and
M. hyadesi beaks prior to isotopic comparison with elephant seals and other marine
organisms.
Variation in Habitat and Trophic Position (δ13C and δ15N) of
Seals with Age
To assess age-related shifts in trophic level and diet structure we compared the isotopic
signatures in whiskers of sub-yearlings (n = 12; this study) to that of one
(n = 5), two (n = 40) and three
(n = 27) year old elephant seals sampled between 1999 and 2000 from Macquarie
Island [75]. Isotopic signatures
of one, two and three year old seals were derived from a single, randomly selected 2 mm section from
each whisker.
Statistical Analyses
We performed all statistical analysis using R version 2.15.0 [76]. To determine if the stable isotopic signatures
(δ13C and δ15N) of migratory, sub-yearling elephant seal whiskers were
influenced by sampling year or the location of foraging (as inferred by the proportion of ARS
locations occurring in IFZs) we used multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) fitted with the
MANOVA function in R. To determine if δ13C or δ15N values were
influenced by sampling year or the location of foraging separately, we used a linear model fitted
with the lm function in R, with whisker δ13C or δ15N values as the
dependent variables, year and foraging location as factors and the two way interaction term. We used
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) along with Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc
analysis to indicate where response variables differed. Proportional data were arcsine transformed
prior to statistical analysis.Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the effects of age class and sex on variation of
stable isotope values. The dependent variable was either δ13C or δ15N,
with sampling year as a random factor, and age and sex as fixed factors. If the distribution was
significantly different from normality, the data were log-transformed and normality verified.
Interactions between sampling year and dependent variables were examined. Effects of age and sex
were, likewise, tested systematically in all analyses. We further assessed qualitative patterns of
variation in habitat and trophic position through graphical examination of δ13C and
δ15N values, respectively. We assessed significance for statistical tests at the 0.05
level. Mean values are given ± standard deviation (SD).
Results
Post-trip whiskers ranged in length from 42 to 144 mm
(mean = 113.7±19.2 mm; n = 12; Table 2) with the number of segments per whisker
ranging from 17 to 55 (mean = 33±9.4). Overall, a total of 551 sections
were cut and analysed.
Table 2
Proportion of time spent (percentage) in Area Restricted Search (ARS) by seals in
Inter-Frontal Zones (IFZs), including the Antarctic zone south of the southern Antarctic Circumpolar
Current front-Southern Branch (S of SACCF-S), the ACC to Polar Front-Southern Branch (ACC to PF-S),
the Polar Front (PF), the Polar Front to sub-Antarctic Front (PF to SAF) and the sub-Antarctic Front
(SAF).
Seal IDNo.
Sex
Proportion of ARS locations occurring in IFZs (%)
Habitat group
S of SACCF-S
ACC to PF-S
PF
PF to SAF
SAF
Total
IFZ
Latitude (°S)
1995/1996
J226
F
0.0
0.0
47.8
5.7
2.0
55.5 (Dec–Apr)
PF
62°41′
J263
M
0.0
28.6
23.1
6.0
0.0
57.7 (Dec–Mar)
ACC to PF-S
64°60′
J373
F
0.0
0.0
46.3
4.4
0.0
50.7 (Dec–Feb)
PF
62°97′
J375
F
0.0
3.1
19.8
19.1
0.0
42.0 (Dec–Mar)
PF
63°19′
J492
F
0.0
13.9
24.2
10.3
0.0
48.4 (Dec–Mar)
PF
62°98′
J503
M
0.0
0.0
40.7
18.7
0.0
59.5 (Dec–Mar)
PF
62°84′
Mean
0.0
7.6±11.6
33.6±12.7
10.7±6.7
0.3±0.8
52.2±6.6
63°17′±0°75′
1999/2000
T719
F
0.0
0.0
49.3
7.8
3.4
60.5 (Jan–May)
PF
56°46′
T825
F
34.6
22.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.4 (Feb–May)
S of SACCF-S
61°64′
T839
F
0.0
56.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
56.5 (Jan–Mar)
ACC to PF-S
64°57′
T867
F
11.3
29.6
9.9
2.2
0.0
53.0 (Jan–Apr)
ACC to PF-S
64°80′
T875
F
0.0
24.6
14.6
1.0
0.0
40.1 (Jan–Apr)
ACC to PF-S
59°43′
T887
F
0.0
36.3
18.7
0.4
0.0
55.5 (Jan–May)
ACC to PF-S
62°43′
Mean
7.6±13.9
28.3±18.5
15.4±18.3
1.9±3.0
0.6±1.4
53.9±6.5
61°55′±3°19′
Overall mean
3.8±10.2
18.0±18.3
24.5±17.8
6.3±6.7
0.4±1.1
53.1±6.3
62°36′±2°36′
The greatest proportion of seal ARS locations occurring in a particular IFZ defined their habitat
group.
The greatest proportion of seal ARS locations occurring in a particular IFZ defined their habitat
group.Isotopic values of whisker segments ranged from −22.9 to −16.6‰ (a difference
of 6.3‰) for δ13C, and from 7.9 to 13.9 (a difference of 6‰) for
δ15N (Fig. 2). From the distal to
proximal regions of the whiskers, δ13C values showed an initial rise and then plateau
in 13C abundance, before starting to fall again (Fig. 2). The number of segments and fall in 13C abundance
varied among individuals. This pattern was even more pronounced in δ15N values, with
seven seals showing a distinct peak and ∼4.0‰ drop in 15N abundance
(range = 3.8 to 4.8‰). A difference of ∼4.0‰ in
δ15N values reflects more than one trophic level of difference (∼3.0‰).
The decline in δ15N values (grey symbols, Fig. 2) coincided with the point of interception with the pre-trip
basal segment (red symbol and line, Fig. 2;
n = 5), indicating a shift in food source from maternal milk and/or fasting
(black symbols, Fig. 2) to independent prey
acquisition (open symbols, Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Schematic plots of δ13C and δ15N values along the post-trip
whiskers of 12 sub-yearling southern elephant seals.
We used stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values incorporated along the length of the whisker
(mm). Values are colour-coded according to shift in food source along the temporal span of whisker
presented in Fig. 1. Black symbols: in-utero/lactation/fasting; grey symbols: diet
shift from mother’s milk and/or fasting to other food sources; open symbols: independent
foraging at sea.
Schematic plots of δ13C and δ15N values along the post-trip
whiskers of 12 sub-yearling southern elephant seals.
We used stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values incorporated along the length of the whisker
(mm). Values are colour-coded according to shift in food source along the temporal span of whisker
presented in Fig. 1. Black symbols: in-utero/lactation/fasting; grey symbols: diet
shift from mother’s milk and/or fasting to other food sources; open symbols: independent
foraging at sea.Other seals (J373, T719, T825, T839 and T887) showed only an initial increase in 15N
abundance along the temporal span (Fig. 2), with
whiskers on average 21.4 mm shorter than that of other seals (101.2±20.9 mm,
n = 5 versus 122.6±12.7 mm, n = 7; Table 3). For the latter group of seals, this
indicates that the portion of whisker that contains the subsequent decline in 15N
abundance (Fig. 1) was still beneath the skin,
and thus not sampled.
Table 3
Stable isotopic characteristics of post-trip whiskers for each sub-yearling elephant seal
(n = 12).
Seal IDNo.
Sex
Whiskerlength
Pre-trip basal segment
Post-trip whisker stable isotopic characteristics
Habitatgroup
Overall
In-utero/lactation/fasting
Independent foraging at sea
(mm)
δ13C (‰)
δ15N (‰)
δ13C (‰)
δ15N (‰)
C:N
Length
δ13C (‰)
δ15N (‰)
Length
δ13C (‰)
δ15N (‰)
(range)
(range)
ratio
(mm)
(mm)
1995/1996
J226
F
121.0
−20.0
10.8
−20.5±1.0
10.5±1.0
2.9±0.1
95.0 (27)
−20.2±0.9
10.6±0.9
12.0 (60)
−21.4±0.5
9.1±0.4
PF
(−21.9–−18.7)
(8.5–12.4)
J263
M
112.0
−20.3
10.5
−20.6±0.5
10.9±0.8
3.0±0.1
90.0 (26)
−20.4±0.5
10.8±0.7
4.0 (2)
−21.0±0.5
9.3±0.7
ACC to PF-S
(−21.5–−19.8)
(9.8–12.6)
J373
F
105.0
−19.9
10.6
−20.2±0.4
10.2±0.4
3.0±0.1
85.0 (27)
−20.1±0.3
10.2±0.4
-
-
-
PF
(−21.1–−19.7)
(9.6–11.2)
J375
F
148.0
−19.6
10.3
−20.2±1.1
10.9±0.9
3.0±0.0
98.0 (31)
−19.5±0.2
10.9±0.8
30.0 (5)
−21.8±0.7
10.3±1.5
PF
(−22.9–−19.1)
(8.7–12.5)
J492
F
112.0
−20.4
11.2
−20.2±0.3
10.0±0.7
2.9±0.1
90.0 (24)
−20.1±0.3
10.2±0.5
4.0 (2)
−20.6±0.0
8.1±0.3
PF
(−20.6–−19.7)
(7.9–11.8)
J503
M
116.0
-
-
−19.7±0.8
11.1±1.0
3.0±0.1
102.0 (28)
−19.5±0.6
11.1±0.9
6.0 (3)
−21.1±0.1
9.3±0.2
PF
(−21.2–−18.6)
(9.2–13.0)
Mean
119.0±15.2
−20.0±0.3
10.7±0.3
−20.2±0.8
10.6±0.9
93.3±6.2
−20.0±0.6
10.7±0.8
11.2±11.0
−21.5±0.7
9.6±1.3
(−22.9–−18.6)
(7.9–13.0)
(27.2±2.3)
(3.6±1.8)
1999/2000
T719
F
132.0
-
-
−17.6±0.5
11.9±0.6
2.9±0.1
129.0 (39)*
−17.7±0.5
11.9±0.6
-
-
-
PF
(−18.5–−16.7)
(10.8–13.7)
T825
F
104.0
-
-
−20.7±0.3
10.4±0.7
2.9±0.1
104.0 (32)*
−20.7±0.4
10.4±0.7
-
-
-
S of SACCF-S
(−21.3–−20.1)
(9.1–11.9)
T839
F
89.0
-
-
−20.9±0.4
10.1±0.7
2.8±0.1
90.0 (24)*
−20.9±0.4
10.1±0.8
-
-
-
ACC to PF-S
(−21.6–−20.4)
(9.2–11.4)
T867
F
129.0
-
-
−20.7±0.5
11.4±1.3
2.9±0.1
102.0 (27)
−20.5±0.5
11.2±1.1
8.0 (4)
−21.1±0.1
9.7±0.3
ACC to PF-S
(−21.5–−20.0)
(9.4–13.4)
T875
F
120.0
-
-
−19.4±1.3
11.3±1.2
2.9±0.0
85.0 (24)
−18.6±0.5
11.5±0.9
18.0 (9)
−21.3±0.4
9.7±0.3
ACC to PF-S
(−21.8–−17.8)
(9.1–13.9)
T887
F
76.0
-
-
−20.5±0.3
10.6±0.8
2.8±0.1
76.0 (19)*
−20.6±0.3
10.7±0.8
-
-
-
ACC to PF-S
(−21.1–−20.1)
(9.7–12.1)
Mean
108.3±22.6
-
-
−19.8±1.4
11.1±1.1
93.5±12.0
−19.6±1.1
11.3±1.0
13.0±7.1
−21.4±0.4
9.7±1.0
(−21.8–−16.7)
(9.1–13.9)
(25.5±2.1)
(6.5±3.5)
Overall mean
113.7±19.2
−20.0±0.3
10.7±0.3
−20.0±1.1
10.8±1.0
93.4±6.9
−19.9±0.8
10.8±0.9
11.7±9.5
−21.4±0.6
9.6±1.0
(−22.9–−16.7)
(7.9–13.9)
(26.8±2.3)
(9.1±6.4)
Seals showed incomplete whisker growth (mm) during in-utero/lactation/fasting.
Results for these animals are not included in the mean and overall mean (± standard
deviation).
Seals showed incomplete whisker growth (mm) during in-utero/lactation/fasting.
Results for these animals are not included in the mean and overall mean (± standard
deviation).The portion of post-trip whisker grown during in-utero/lactation/fasting ranged
in length from 85 to 102 mm (mean = 93.4±6.9 mm; 77.2±5.7%
of total whisker length; n = 8; Table 3) with the number of segments per whisker ranging from 24 to 31
(mean = 26.8±2.3), while the portion of post-trip whisker grown during
independent foraging at sea ranged in length from 4 to 30 mm
(mean = 11.7±9.5 mm; 9.1±6.4% of total whisker length;
n = 7; Table 3) with the
number of segments per whisker ranging from 2 to 9 (mean = 4.4±2.5).The number of days that the sub-yearling elephant seals spent at sea ranged from 126 to 182 days
(mean = 153.2±19.5 d; Table 1). The time spent in transit mode ranged from 12 to 76 days
(mean = 50.0±15.1 d; 32.4% of all locations at sea), while the
time spent in ARS mode ranged from 62 to 108 days (mean = 81.7±16.1 d;
53.2% of all locations at sea).Area Restricted Search locations for sub-yearlings in the 1995/1996 deployment occurred between
December 1995 and April 1996, and between January and May 2000 in the 1999/2000 deployment (Table 2). Area Restricted Search locations occurred
primarily at the distal portion of tracks (Fig.
3A; see Fig. S1 for
individual tracks). The highest proportion of sub-yearlings (1995/1996: n = 6;
1999/2000: n = 2) utilized waters southeast of Macquarie Island, parallel with
the Mid-Ocean ridge (MOR), ranging from 55°S to 66°S and 160°E to 170°W (Fig. 3A). In 1999/2000, three individuals utilized
waters further to the southeast ranging from 59°S to 64°S and 160°E to 160°W, while
one individual (T719) utilized waters southwest of Macquarie Island, associated with the Southeast
Indian Ridge (SEIR), ranging from 53°S to 58°S and 130°E to 160°E (Fig. 3A). The majority of ARS locations of seals
occurred within Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Statistical Subareas 58.4.1, to the southwest of Macquarie Island, and 88.1 and 88.2 to the
southeast (Fig. 3A).
Figure 3
Tracks of 12 weaned southern elephant seals during their first migration from Macquarie
Island.
Tracks are colour-coded according to (A) behavioural state estimates from the two-state
first-difference correlated random walk switching (DCRWS) model overlaid in yellow (Transit) and red
(Area Restricted Search) and (B) Inter-Frontal Zones (IFZs). From south to north, IFZs included the
Antarctic zone south of the southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front-Southern branch (S of
SACCF-S), the ACC to Polar Front-Southern branch (ACC to PF-S), the PF, the PF to sub-Antarctic
Front (PF to SAF), the SAF, and the SAF-Northern branch to sub-Antarctic Zone (SAF-N to SAZ). Dashed
lines indicate the boundaries of CCAMLR Statistical Subareas 58.4.1, 88.1 and 88.2. All seal tracks
originated and terminated at Macquarie Island, located in the South-West Pacific Ocean sector of the
Southern Ocean.
Tracks of 12 weaned southern elephant seals during their first migration from Macquarie
Island.
Tracks are colour-coded according to (A) behavioural state estimates from the two-state
first-difference correlated random walk switching (DCRWS) model overlaid in yellow (Transit) and red
(Area Restricted Search) and (B) Inter-Frontal Zones (IFZs). From south to north, IFZs included the
Antarctic zone south of the southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front-Southern branch (S of
SACCF-S), the ACC to Polar Front-Southern branch (ACC to PF-S), the PF, the PF to sub-Antarctic
Front (PF to SAF), the SAF, and the SAF-Northern branch to sub-Antarctic Zone (SAF-N to SAZ). Dashed
lines indicate the boundaries of CCAMLR Statistical Subareas 58.4.1, 88.1 and 88.2. All seal tracks
originated and terminated at Macquarie Island, located in the South-West Pacific Ocean sector of the
Southern Ocean.Of the seven summarised IFZs utilised by sub-yearlings during migration from Macquarie Island
(Fig. 3B), five were used by young seals while
in ARS mode (Table 2). Of these, the PF was
the most commonly used, with 24.5±17.8% of all ARS locations occurring in this zone,
followed by the ACC to PF-S (18.0±18.3%), the PF to SAF (6.3±6.7%), the
S of SACCF-S (3.8±10.2%) and lastly, the SAF (0.4±1.1%). Between
deployment years, the PF was the most commonly used zone in 1995/1996 (n = 5),
while the ACC to PF-S was the most commonly used zone in 1999/2000 (n = 5). A
single individual in 1999/2000 however, predominantly utilized waters south of the SACCF-S, with
34.6% of all search locations occurring in this zone (Table 2). The mean latitude of ARS locations occurring in each zone
ranged from 56°5′S to 63°2′S in the PF, from 59°4′S to
64°6′S in the ACC to PF-S, and 61°6′S in the S of SACCF-S. We therefore
identified two main habitat groups, the ‘ACC to PF-S’ (n = 5) and
the ‘PF’ (n = 6; Table 2). The small sample size of seals utilizing the region south of the SACCF-S
(n = 1) however, precluded further statistical comparison of this IFZ.There was considerable overlap in δ13C and δ15N whisker values
between individuals, with no significant differences in isotopic means and variances between years
or IFZs detected in multivariate (MANOVA, Wilk’s λ: Year:
F
1,2 = 1.150,
P = 0.426; Zone:
F
1,2 = 0.499,
P = 0.650) and in uni-variate analysis (ANOVA:
δ13C: all P>0.688; δ15N: all
P>0.514). Mean isotopic values of sub-yearling elephant seal whiskers foraging
in both the ACC to PF-S and PF were −21.2±0.4‰
(range = −21.8 to −20.6‰; a difference of 1.2‰) for
δ13C, and 9.4±0.7‰ (range = 8.1 to 10.3‰; a
difference of 2.2‰) for δ15N (Table 3; Fig. 4A).
Figure 4
Area Restricted Search locations and whisker δ13C and δ15N
values reflecting independent foraging at sea.
(A) Mean δ13C and δ15N whisker values and (B) Area Restricted
Search locations for 7 sub-yearling elephant seals during their first migration from Macquarie
Island are colour-coded according to foraging location (Inter-Frontal Zones, IFZs, presented in Fig.
2). Bathymetric features including the Southeast Indian Ridge, Australian-Antarctic Basin and
Mid-Ocean Ridge are indicated in (B). Values are mean±SD.
Area Restricted Search locations and whisker δ13C and δ15N
values reflecting independent foraging at sea.
(A) Mean δ13C and δ15N whisker values and (B) Area Restricted
Search locations for 7 sub-yearling elephant seals during their first migration from Macquarie
Island are colour-coded according to foraging location (Inter-Frontal Zones, IFZs, presented in Fig.
2). Bathymetric features including the Southeast Indian Ridge, Australian-Antarctic Basin and
Mid-Ocean Ridge are indicated in (B). Values are mean±SD.As latitude is central in relating isotopic signatures in the tissues of consumers to foraging
habitat in the Southern Ocean, we looked at the potential relationships between isotopic signatures
(δ13C and δ15N) of elephant seal whiskers and the mean latitude of
their foraging locations (i.e. habitat group, Table 2). No significant relationship between whisker isotopic values
and mean latitude of foraging was detected (ANOVA: δ13C:
F
1,5 = 0.263,
P = 0.630; δ15N:
F
1,5 = 0.004,
P = 0.950), with considerable overlap in both
δ13C and δ15N values and mean latitude of foraging location among
seals (Fig. 4). Foraging locations of
sub-yearlings encompassed a narrow latitudinal band (∼60 to 65°S), with mean latitude of
locations ranging from 62°42′ to 63°19′S for seals foraging in the PF zone
(n = 4), and from 59°43′ to 64°80′S for seals foraging in
the ACC to PF-S zone (n = 3; Fig.
4B).
Inferred Prey Consumption during the First 6 Months
Mean δ13C and δ15N values for seal whiskers (corrected for trophic
discrimination) and potential prey items were plotted together (Fig. 5; Table S1). Seals foraging in the two IFZs showed similar isotope
values to a mixture of intermediate trophic level mesopelagic fish, such as E.
antarctica (δ13C: −23.2‰ and δ15N: 8.3‰),
G. fraseri (δ13C: −22.5‰ and δ15N value:
8.0‰), Krefftichthys anderssoni (δ13C: −22.3‰
and δ15N: 7.6‰), and the squids Kondakovia longimana
(δ13C: −25.1‰ and δ15N: 7.6‰) and
Galiteuthis glacialis (δ13C: −24.7‰ and
δ15N: 8.1‰), and lower trophic level mesopelgic fish, such as P.
tensioni (δ13C: −22.1‰ and δ15N value:
6.4‰), and the squid M. hyadesi (δ13C: −21.6‰
and δ15N value: 6.6‰).
Figure 5
Mean δ13C and δ15N values of sub-yearling elephant seals and
other Southern Ocean marine organisms.
Mean δ13C and δ15N values in the whiskers of individual
sub-yearlings foraging in ACC to PF-S (blue symbols) and PF (green symbols) zones, corrected for
trophic discrimination by subtracting 3.2‰ and 2.8‰ from δ13C and
δ15N values in Fig. 4B, respectively. Mean δ13C and
δ15N values in the tissues of other Southern Ocean marine organisms ([69], [70], [71], [72], this
study) were grouped into crustacean, fish and squid taxa (white, dark grey and grey symbols,
respectively). E.frig: Euphausia frigida; E.sup: E. superba;
E.tria: E. triacantha; Them: Themisto gaudichaudii; E.ant:
Electrona antarctica; E.ant (Kerg.): Electrona antarctica
(Kerguelen); G.fra: Gymnoscopelus fraseri; G.nic: G. nicholsi;
G.pia: G. piablis; Kreff.: Krefftichthys anderssoni; P.ten:
Protomyctophum tenisoni; B.aby: Bathyteuthis abysicola; Hist.:
Histioteuthis eltaninae; Kond.: Kondakovia longimana; Psych.:
Psychroteuthis glacialis; Psych. (RS): Psychroteuthis glacialis
(Ross Sea); G.gla: Galiteuthis glacialis; Mart.: Martialia
hyadesi. Squid beak values were corrected for the reduced 15N enrichment due to
chitin. Values are mean±SD.
Mean δ13C and δ15N values of sub-yearling elephant seals and
other Southern Ocean marine organisms.
Mean δ13C and δ15N values in the whiskers of individual
sub-yearlings foraging in ACC to PF-S (blue symbols) and PF (green symbols) zones, corrected for
trophic discrimination by subtracting 3.2‰ and 2.8‰ from δ13C and
δ15N values in Fig. 4B, respectively. Mean δ13C and
δ15N values in the tissues of other Southern Ocean marine organisms ([69], [70], [71], [72], this
study) were grouped into crustacean, fish and squid taxa (white, dark grey and grey symbols,
respectively). E.frig: Euphausia frigida; E.sup: E. superba;
E.tria: E. triacantha; Them: Themisto gaudichaudii; E.ant:
Electrona antarctica; E.ant (Kerg.): Electrona antarctica
(Kerguelen); G.fra: Gymnoscopelus fraseri; G.nic: G. nicholsi;
G.pia: G. piablis; Kreff.: Krefftichthys anderssoni; P.ten:
Protomyctophum tenisoni; B.aby: Bathyteuthis abysicola; Hist.:
Histioteuthis eltaninae; Kond.: Kondakovia longimana; Psych.:
Psychroteuthis glacialis; Psych. (RS): Psychroteuthis glacialis
(Ross Sea); G.gla: Galiteuthis glacialis; Mart.: Martialia
hyadesi. Squid beak values were corrected for the reduced 15N enrichment due to
chitin. Values are mean±SD.The δ13C and δ15N values recorded in the seals (as shown in Fig. 5) strongly suggest that crustaceans, such as
euphausiids, are consumed. This is because the isotopic values of seals are (to varying degrees)
intermediate between crustaceans, such as E. triacantha (δ13C:
−23.6‰ and δ15N value: 6.3‰), E. superba
(δ13C: −25.8‰ and δ15N value: 5.5‰) and T.
gaudichaudii (δ13C: −26.0‰ and δ15N value:
5.4‰), and higher trophic level fish and squid (Fig. 5). In at least four individuals (J263, J226, J503 and J492) they appear to have had
some euphausiids in their diets. The interpretation of the other three individuals (J375, T867 and
T875) is more ambiguous as their position on the plot could be due to either a mixture of squid,
such as P. glacialis (δ13C: −25.3‰ and
δ15N value: 7.9‰) and M. hyadesi or euphausiids and squid,
such as E. frigida (δ13C: −24.3‰ and
δ15N value: 4.9‰) and P. glacialis or even a combination of
fish, squid and crustaceans.Stable carbon values in whiskers showed significant variation with age (mixed-effects ANOVA:
F3,126 = 10.116, P = 0.001),
reflecting spatial variability in foraging habitat between age classes. Mean δ13C
values ranged from −21.4±0.6‰ (range = −21.9 to
−20.5‰) for sub-yearlings, compared to −20.2±0.9‰
(range = −21.7 to −17.7‰), −20.2±1.0‰
(range = −22.3 to −18.2‰) and −20.7±0.9‰
(range = −23.0 to −19.1‰) for one, two and three year olds,
respectively (Fig. 6). Post-hoc analysis
indicated sub-yearlings were significantly depleted in δ13C compared to one and two
year olds (Tukey’s HSD post-hoc difference tests, both P<0.0001).
Sub-yearlings also appeared depleted in δ13C compared to three olds, however no
significant variation was detected (P = 0.06).
Figure 6
Whisker δ13C and δ15N values of juvenile southern elephant
seals from Macquarie Island.
Stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values from a
randomly selected 2 mm section of whisker from (A) sub-yearling (n = 7; colour
coded by foraging locations (IFZs) presented in Fig. 4), (B) one year (n = 35;
light grey symbols), (C) two year (n = 40; dark grey symbols) and (D) three
year old (n = 27; black symbols) age classes of elephant seals from Macquarie
Island ([75], this study). Also
shown are marginal frequency distributions for the δ13C and δ15N
values for each age class.
Whisker δ13C and δ15N values of juvenile southern elephant
seals from Macquarie Island.
Stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values from a
randomly selected 2 mm section of whisker from (A) sub-yearling (n = 7; colour
coded by foraging locations (IFZs) presented in Fig. 4), (B) one year (n = 35;
light grey symbols), (C) two year (n = 40; dark grey symbols) and (D) three
year old (n = 27; black symbols) age classes of elephant seals from Macquarie
Island ([75], this study). Also
shown are marginal frequency distributions for the δ13C and δ15N
values for each age class.Stable nitrogen isotopic values in whiskers showed significant variation with age (mixed-effects
ANOVA: F
3,126 = 8.720,
P<0.0001). Mean δ15N values ranged from 9.6±1.0‰
(range = 7.9 to 13.9.0‰) for sub-yearlings, compared to
11.0±1.3‰ (range = 8.8 to 13.3‰), 11.2±1.4‰
(range = 8.7 to 13.8‰), and 10.7±1.1‰
(range = 9.4 to 13.2‰) for one, two and three year old age classes,
respectively (Fig. 6). Post-hoc analysis
indicated sub-yearlings were significantly depleted in δ15N compared to one, two and
three year old seals (Tukey’s HSD post-hoc difference tests, all P<0.01).
Some one and two year old seals however, showed similar depleted δ13C and
δ15N values as sub-yearlings, indicating overlap in both foraging habitat and trophic
position.
Discussion
The foraging range and prey intake of air-breathing marine predators is largely dictated by their
physiological capabilities, most often related to body size [77], [78], [79]. The
diet of young, independent offspring during their first foraging migration may therefore, differ
substantially from that of older and larger conspecifics. This is particularly true for species
where physiological and behavioural attributes can take several years to reach adult capacity. In
southern elephant seals the dive durations and depth of newly weaned seals are known to be limited
by their body size [20], [40].Using a combination of tracking and stable isotope data, we found the diet of sub-yearling
southern elephant seals from Macquarie Island, foraging predominantly in waters at or south of the
PF (∼60°S) and within CCAMLR Statistical Subareas 88.1 and 88.2, to be consistent with the
consumption of mesopelagic fish and squid, and crustaceans. The predominance of mesopelagic fish and
squid in the diet of older juvenile and adult seals has been well documented [5], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84] however, the likely importance of crustaceans, such as euphausiids, in the
diet of young seals feeding inside the CCAMLR management zone, is a significant, new finding for
this species. Comparison of whisker isotopic values of sub-yearlings and older juvenile age classes
(one, two and three year olds) ([75], this study) showed sub-yearlings to be relatively depleted in both
δ13C and δ15N. This is indicative of younger seals (constrained by
their size, dive capabilities and prey capture skills) unable to access larger, higher trophic level
prey deep in the water column (>300 m), feeding closer to the surface where lower trophic level
crustaceans, such as euphausiids, offer an abundant source of prey in addition to fish and
squid.Precaution must be taken in interpreting dietary trends inferred from isotopic results, as the
combination of prey types using this technique can never be accurately quantified [85], [86], [87]. The most plausible explanation for the low
mean δ13C and δ15N values of sub-yearlings however is the consumption
of euphausiids (and copepods and amphipods). Moreover, tracking data confirms that the foraging
range of sub-yearlings at this time of year overlaps with the maximum sea-ice extent and known
distribution of euphausiids in this region of east Antarctica [88], [89], [90].
Further, the known dive depth and diurnal migrations of sub-yearlings (dive depth ∼100 m) [40] is consistent with the vertical
distribution of krill in the Western Antarctic Peninsula during winter [91], [92].From a conservation and management viewpoint, our findings have important implications. We
provide evidence of a new crustacean (krill) predator, the southern elephant seal, within waters
managed under CCAMLR. Our findings show that regions associated with the Ross Sea constitute
important foraging grounds for southern elephant seals during their critical, first year of life in
which they transition to independent foraging.
Whisker Growth Dynamics
Bio-logging and natural biochemical tracers are increasingly being used to provide spatially
explicit dietary information for highly migratory marine predators [93], [94], [95], [96]. Whiskers, collected from animals tracked by satellite, contain a time-series
of stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen which can potentially be related to individual
telemetry tracks, establishing a means to link diet to remote feeding grounds. To interpret this
dietary information in a spatio-temporal context however requires knowledge of the growth history of
the whisker [36], [97], [98].Accounting for the growth dynamics of whiskers enables the correct interpretation of the
time-series of diet information incorporated along the length of the whisker [36]. In all sub-yearling elephant seals we found a
similar pattern in isotopic enrichment along the temporal span of the whisker, i.e.
from the distal to proximal region. However, this pattern was more pronounced in δ15N
values, with an initial rise and distinct peak in 15N abundance indicative of the shift
in food source from in-utero development to mother’s milk during lactation.
Nursing offspring essentially feed at a higher trophic level than their mothers do as has been shown
in several species, including pinnipeds [99], [100],
[101]. In northernelephant
seals, Habran et al. [100] found
young pups to be increasingly enriched in 15N compared to that of their mothers from
early (+0.6‰, day 5) to late lactation (+1.3‰, day 22), while in Steller sea
lions (Eumetopias jubatus), Stegall et al. [101] recorded the root of the whisker (representing
current growth) of young pups to be 15N enriched (+2.0‰) over their diet
(ingested mother’s milk) during lactation.Of the twelve sub-yearlings with concurrent isotopic and tracking data, seven seals showed a
subsequent fall in δ15N values, equivalent to more than one trophic level of a
difference (∼3‰) and indicative of a diet shift from mother’s milk and/or fasting
to free ranging prey. We suggest that the reason we do not see this decline in δ15N
values in the other five seals is that slower whisker growth meant that the new material,
synthesized after weaning, never appeared above the skin and was therefore not sampled. The portion
of whisker grown during independent foraging at sea accounted for 11.7±9.5 mm or
9.1±6.4% of total growth, indicating that an average of 12 mm of growth is contained
under the skin for the latter group of seals. In contrast, the portion of post-trip whisker grown
during in-utero/lactation/fasting accounted for 93.4±6.9 mm or
77.2±5.7% of total whisker growth (n = 8). In elephant seals,
whiskers are established early during in-utero development with foetal whiskers
growing as much as 27 mm in length, and are not shed during their annual pelage moult but randomly
after seals are at least two years of age [102]. Moreover, whisker growth rates (0.87 mm per day) of new born, nursing
bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) suggest periods of rapid, somatic growth may be
reflected in the growth of the whiskers [103]. These results therefore suggest that like other phocid species, the rapid
accumulation of energy reserves as blubber by nursing elephant seals [11], [104], may be reflected in the growth of the whiskers.In summary, we found whiskers to be extremely useful tools for accessing time integrated diet
information of elephant seals during their first year of life as we can trace the origin of the
signature incorporated along the length of the whisker, i.e. from maternal
investment to independent foraging. A significant finding of this study was that whiskers collected
after the first foraging trip were predominantly still composed of in-utero and
pre-weaning material as a result of relatively slow whisker growth rates during the 3 to 4 month
foraging trip. The results of this study also highlight the need to sample plucked and not cut
whiskers for future isotopic dietary analysis in order to capture the most recent isotopic
information contained in the root of the whisker under the skin.The foraging behaviour of a predator can change in response to the distribution of prey resources
in a large heterogeneous environment. Identifying changes in the movement behaviour of a predator
can therefore be informative as to the distribution and consumption of prey resources at a range of
temporal scales. Over a period of 4 to 6 months satellite tracking data showed that sub-yearling
elephant seals dispersed, in some cases thousands of kilometres, to the southeast of Macquarie
Island ([10], [40], this study) apart from one
individual which travelled to the southwest of Macquarie Island. Area Restricted Search locations,
used as a proxy for foraging areas of sub-yearling elephant seals, occurred at the distal portion of
tracks.Foraging locations in the southeast group were primarily associated with ACC frontal branches of
the PF (PF-S to PF-N, summarised as the PF; n = 5) and the SACCF (SACCF-S to
PF-S, summarised as the ACC to PF-S; n = 6) and bathymetric features such as
the MOR. The foraging locations of the single seal which travelled to the southwest of Macquarie
Island were primarily associated with frontal branches of the PF and the SEIR. In this study, the
foraging locations of only one seal were primarily associated with waters to the south of the sBdy
(south of sBdy to SACCF-S, summarised as S of SACCF-S).The movement and foraging behaviour of sub-yearling elephant seals from this site has been
previously investigated [10],
[21], [40], [105]. Two studies in particular, detail the
movement, foraging areas [10],
[40] and dive behaviour [40] of seals, including animals from
this study. In this study, we separated travel into two phases, transit and ARS. Area Restricted
Search behaviour is thought to occur in response to the patchy distribution of resources in an
environment [106]. This behaviour
corresponds with periods of reduced travel speed and increased turning rate, which are more likely
to be associated with movements associated with feeding as opposed to transit [48]. McConnell et al. [10] and Hindell et al. [40] separated travel into three phases (initial
outbound transit, intermediate movement and final return transit) based upon daily travel rates for
a large number of sub-yearlings (n = 30 for both studies). Intermediate tracks,
presumed to represent feeding, corresponded to slower and less directed travel, interrupted by
occasional bouts of increased travel [10], [40]. The
dive behaviour of seals during this time consisted of relatively shallow and short dives
(117±48 m and 5.9±1.4 min, respectively; [40]). Concentrated activity (locations of feeding)
were centred on localised patches up to 1900 km from Macquarie Island, with the southern boundary of
tracks in the southeast group aligned with the SACCF [10], [40]. These foraging areas (mean duration 67 days)
matched well with the ARS areas (mean duration 81 days) of the sub-yearlings in this study.
Variation in Habitat (δ13C) of Seals with the Location of Foraging
We found that the most depleted δ13C values incorporated along the temporal span
of the whisker (as represented by the growth of the whisker) were contained in the portion of
whisker grown during independent foraging at sea (−21.4±0.6‰,
n = 7; Fig. 2), while the
most enriched δ13C values were contained in the portion of whisker grown during
in-utero/lactation/fasting (−19.8±1.1‰,
n = 12; Table 2). In
oceanic waters of the Southern Ocean, the POM δ13C values become more depleted with
increasing latitudes, and these latitudinal changes are subsequently transferred to higher levels
within the food chain [67], [68]. The decline in δ13C
values towards the proximal region of the whisker is therefore consistent with the southward
migration of seals (outward transit tracks) to high latitude foraging areas (ARS tracks) located at
or south of the PF (∼60°S) to the southeast of Macquarie Island (Fig. 4B; Fig. S1.).It remains unclear to what degree young seals feed on the outward transit leg of their foraging
trips [19] however it is most
likely that sub-yearlings are in a state of transition from mother’s milk and/or fasting to
free ranging prey, as indicated by the concurrent ∼3‰ drop in δ15N and
reduced whisker growth (∼10 mm), at this time (Fig.
3). However, δ13C values related to independent foraging appear to stabilise
at ∼−21.0‰, presumably after seals have reached their main foraging grounds. We are
therefore fairly certain the δ13C values contained in the portion of whisker grown
during independent foraging at sea are representative of core foraging habitat use, namely waters of
the PF and ACC to PF-S.There was considerable overlap in the δ13C signatures of sub-yearlings related to
independent foraging, both between years and foraging locations (IFZs:
PF = −21.5±0.5‰, n = 4; ACC to
PF-S = −21.2±0.4‰, n = 3), indicating
that even though seals were using similar latitudes (62°89′±1°77′;
n = 7), they were in fact in different water masses, and there was no
difference in δ13C between those water masses. The structure and flow of the ACC is
complex, consisting of multiple frontal filaments or branches that are strongly influenced by
bathymetry [52]. The PF marks the
southern boundary of the PF to SAF zone and the beginning of the ACC to PF-S zone, while the sBdy
delimits the southern boundary of the ACC to PF-S and the beginning of the S of SACCF-S zone. In the
southwest Pacific sector, the frontal branches of the PF and SACCF merge to form a single frontal
zone on the northern slope of the MOR near 170°E or where diverted to the south by obstacles
like the Campbell Plateau. Frontal branches however, are clearly separated over deep ocean basins,
such as the Australian – Antarctic Basin to the southwest of Macquarie Island [52]. As a consequence, the magnitude
of the latitudinal variation in the boundaries of the PF and SACCF is much greater to the southwest
of Macquarie Island than to the southeast of Macquarie Island [50], [51], [52],
[53], [107]. This indicates that δ13C
signatures are not adequate to resolve habitat (water mass) at this scale and consequently, seals
located to the southeast of Macquarie Island and predominantly associated with frontal branches of
the PF and SACCF (i.e. PF and ACC to PF-S zones, respectively) and the MOR show
similar δ13C values.Very little is known about the diet of southern elephant seals during the course of their
migrations, particularly in relation to core foraging areas. Lavaged stomachs of both juvenile and
adult seals returning to colonies, which represent the most recent prey intake at the end of
foraging trips, consist largely of mesopelagic fish and squid at Macquarie Island [5], [22], [80], [108], and other populations across the Southern Ocean [23], [81], [83],
[84], [109], [110], while an increasing amount of inferential data from biochemical tracers,
such as stable isotopes and fatty acids augment the dietary trends identified by stomach content
analysis [15], [70], [75], [111]. There is however, very little information available on the diet of elephant
seals during their first foraging migration [81]. The whisker isotopic signatures of sub-yearlings provided dietary
information corresponding to at least the first half of their foraging trips. Stable nitrogen values
spanned more than one trophic level, with considerable overlap in δ15N values of
seals both between years and foraging locations (IFZs) suggesting that all seals fed at a similar
trophic level irrespective of foraging habitat. However, there was considerable individual
variability in their diet. Pronounced individual variability has also been described in diving
behaviour within water masses for this species [24]. Individual specialisation in diet increases the niche breadth for a
population and may offer some buffering against a changing resources base [103].The trophic position of seals, which foraged to the southeast of Macquarie Island in waters at or
south of the PF and within CCAMLR Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 (>60°S; Fig. 3) were consistent with the consumption of a mixture of
intermediate trophic level mesopelagic fish and squid (δ15N: ∼8‰, such as
E. antarctica, G. fraseri, K. anderssoni, G. glacialis, K.
longimana and P. glacialis), lower trophic level mesopelagic fish and
squid (δ15N: ∼5–7‰, such as M. hyadesi and
P. tenisoni) and lower trophic level crustaceans (δ15N:
<6‰, such as euphausiids, copepods and amphipods) characteristic of that sampled within
colder, high latitude eastern Antarctic waters [88]. The consumption of mesopelagic fish and squid is consistent with the dietary
trends of elephant seals determined in previous studies. However, sub-yearlings showed lower mean
δ15N signatures compared to older juvenile (Fig. 6) [75] and adult seals [70]. When we compare the isotopic signatures of sub-yearlings and potential prey,
the most parsimonious explanation is the consumption of lower trophic level crustaceans, such as
euphausiids, in addition to fish and squid. In addition, stable isotope data provided dietary
information relating to the first half of foraging trips, with the most recent isotopic values
contained in the root of the whisker under the skin. Therefore, this may only be a conservative
estimate of the level of crustacean consumption by seals in this study and requires further
investigation.Caution must be taken however, in over-interpretation of these observed dietary trends as prey
data (other than squid beak data for H. eltaninae and M. hyadesi)
are taken from outside the foraging range of juvenile elephant seals from this site [14], [21] and therefore, requires further examination.
Moreover, isotopic fractionation values for keratinous tissues vary among species and studies [112] thus, factors determined for
captive pinnipeds (as applied in this study) may not accurately represent wild populations.
Nevertheless, the presence of myctophid fish, such as Electrona and
Gymnoscopelus spp. [5], [81] and of
squid, such as P. glacialis and H. eltaninae in the stomach
contents of older juveniles from Macquarie Island [22] and Heard Island [81], confirms the consumption of mesopelagic prey by
sub-yearlings. Moreover, similarities in foraging behaviour [40] and trophic level among seals and one of the most
specialised consumers of myctophids and squid, the king penguin (Aptenodytes
patagonicus) [113], [114], [115], which forages in similar regions of the PF south
of Macquarie Island [116], also
provides evidence that sub-yearlings fed at depths where similar mesopelagic fish and squid prey
were accessible.Crustaceans have been reported in the diet of elephant seals [5], [23], [80], [81], however, this has usually been
attributed to incidental or secondary consumption. Nevertheless, stomach content analysis revealed
higher proportions of crustaceans in the diet of one and two year-old seals compared to that of
three year-olds [5], and were
reported as primary prey of elephant seals by Green and Burton [80]. Euphausia triacantha generally
occurs in waters between 50°S and 65°S, with vertical distribution between 250 to 750 m
during the day and above 250 m at night [117]. Euphausia superba is predominantly herbivorous [118], [119], while more northern species, such as E.
triacantha, are carnivorous [120], which explains its higher trophic position relative to E.
superba. Due to the diurnal changes in the abundance and distribution of euphausiids [121], [122], sub-yearlings, which are smaller and cannot
dive as deep or for as long as larger seals [20], [40], may
encounter euphuasiid species at densities sufficiently large at shallower depths to make these
important prey items.Moreover, the southern boundary of foraging areas of sub-yearlings aligned with the sBdy
(∼65°S; Fig. 2), coinciding with the
maximum sea-ice extent [90] and
known distribution of Antarctic krill (E. superba) in east Antarctic waters during
late summer/early winter [88], [89]. Collectively, these results
indicate that lower trophic level crustaceans, namely euphausiids, may form an important part of the
diet for young seals. Consequently, sub-yearlings may be an important krill predator that should be
taken into account within the CCAMLR management zone. These areas are important to elephant seals
during the transition to independent foraging, and other marine predators of Macquarie Island, which
exploit similar areas to the south of Macquarie Island (e.g. king penguins and
royal penguins, Eudyptes schlegeli) [123], [124].Ontogenetic changes in movement patterns, foraging habitat use and diet have been reported for
older juvenile southern elephant seals from Macquarie Island [5], [18], [21],
[22], [75], other populations [80], [81] and in their northern counterpart, the northern elephant seal [125]. Sub-yearlings showed more
depleted δ13C and δ15N values than older juvenile seals, indicating
ontogenetic segregation in both foraging range and trophic position, respectively. These observed
isotopic differences are in good agreement with sub-yearlings feeding at a lower trophic level than
older seals, since their size, dive capabilities and predation skills are limited [20], [40]. The increased diving capabilities of elephant
seals with increasing age are well documented [126], and may give older juveniles and adults a substantial advantage in
capturing prey found at greater depths. Indeed, higher trophic level cephalopod prey of elephant
seals, such as P. glacialis and Alluroteuthis antarcticus
[22], [80], occur at high densities deep in the water column
(500 to 1000 m). Sub-yearling elephant seals, limited to some extent by their physiological
capabilities, are restricted to the upper 300 m of the water column (mostly 100 to 200 m depth)
[40]. Lower trophic level pelagic
prey, such as smaller-sized myctophid fish and crustaceans, which occur in high densities in the
upper limits of the water column, may therefore provide an abundant and easily accessible source of
prey for smaller seals. Crustaceans may, therefore, form a significant part of the diet of some
sub-yearlings.Tracks overlaid with state estimates from the two-state first-difference correlated random
walk switching (DCRWS) model. Tracks of 12 weaned southern elephant seals during their first
foraging migration from Macquarie Island, colour coded by state estimates. Grey: transit locations;
light blue, blue and green: Area Restricted Search (ARS) locations for S of SACCF-S, ACC to PF-S and
PF zones, respectively.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Stable carbon (δ(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Charles F Phleger; Matthew M Nelson; Ben D Mooney; Peter D Nichols Journal: Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.231
Authors: Seth D Newsome; Gena B Bentall; M Tim Tinker; Olav T Oftedal; Katherine Ralls; James A Estes; Marilyn L Fogel Journal: Ecol Appl Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.657
Authors: Patrick W Robinson; Daniel P Costa; Daniel E Crocker; Juan Pablo Gallo-Reynoso; Cory D Champagne; Melinda A Fowler; Chandra Goetsch; Kimberly T Goetz; Jason L Hassrick; Luis A Hückstädt; Carey E Kuhn; Jennifer L Maresh; Sara M Maxwell; Birgitte I McDonald; Sarah H Peterson; Samantha E Simmons; Nicole M Teutschel; Stella Villegas-Amtmann; Ken Yoda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cloe R Cummings; Mary-Anne Lea; Margaret G Morrice; Simon Wotherspoon; Mark A Hindell Journal: Conserv Physiol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 3.079