UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of repeated (90)Y radioembolization with resin microspheres in patients with extensive primary and secondary liver tumors after failure of first radioembolization. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 21 patients (12 women, 9 men; mean age, 61.0 y) with nonresectable advanced liver tumors (breast cancer liver metastases, n = 7; colorectal liver metastases, n = 5; hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 8; cholangiocellular carcinoma, n = 1) were repeatedly treated by radioembolization. Safety was the primary endpoint. Whole-liver treatment was achieved with sequential treatment sessions in most patients, with selective embolization of the left and right liver lobes within 6 wk. Toxicity was documented prospectively and according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 criteria based on laboratory parameters; magnetic-resonance tomography; and clinical examinations 3 d, 6 wk, and every 3 mo after selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Metric variables were evaluated using the Student t test. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: Patients received an average of 1.6 whole-liver treatments performed in 3.0 unilobar radioembolizations (liver lobes sequentially). The mean total activity administered was 2.57 GBq. No radioembolization-induced liver disease was observed in any of the patients. Three patients showed reversible grade III to IV toxicities according to laboratory values, which returned to pretreatment levels after 6 wk. In 1 patient, a treatment-related duodenal ulcer occurred. Median overall survival was 18 mo after first radioembolization. CONCLUSION: In advanced liver tumors, repeated whole-liver treatments with (90)Y radioembolization can be performed with an acceptable toxicity profile.
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of repeated (90)Y radioembolization with resin microspheres in patients with extensive primary and secondary liver tumors after failure of first radioembolization. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 21 patients (12 women, 9 men; mean age, 61.0 y) with nonresectable advanced liver tumors (breast cancer liver metastases, n = 7; colorectal liver metastases, n = 5; hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 8; cholangiocellular carcinoma, n = 1) were repeatedly treated by radioembolization. Safety was the primary endpoint. Whole-liver treatment was achieved with sequential treatment sessions in most patients, with selective embolization of the left and right liver lobes within 6 wk. Toxicity was documented prospectively and according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 criteria based on laboratory parameters; magnetic-resonance tomography; and clinical examinations 3 d, 6 wk, and every 3 mo after selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Metric variables were evaluated using the Student t test. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS:Patients received an average of 1.6 whole-liver treatments performed in 3.0 unilobar radioembolizations (liver lobes sequentially). The mean total activity administered was 2.57 GBq. No radioembolization-induced liver disease was observed in any of the patients. Three patients showed reversible grade III to IV toxicities according to laboratory values, which returned to pretreatment levels after 6 wk. In 1 patient, a treatment-related duodenal ulcer occurred. Median overall survival was 18 mo after first radioembolization. CONCLUSION: In advanced liver tumors, repeated whole-liver treatments with (90)Y radioembolization can be performed with an acceptable toxicity profile.
Authors: Max Masthoff; Philipp Schindler; Fabian Harders; Walter Heindel; Christian Wilms; Hartmut H Schmidt; Andreas Pascher; Lars Stegger; Kambiz Rahbar; Moritz Wildgruber; Michael Köhler Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2020-09
Authors: Wali Badar; Thuong Van Ha; Steven Zangan; Rakesh Navuluri; Anjana Pillai; Talia Baker; Leonard Dalag; Ross Han; Osman Ahmed Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Jens M Theysohn; Marcus Ruhlmann; Stefan Müller; Alexander Dechene; Jan Best; Johannes Haubold; Lale Umutlu; Guido Gerken; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas C Lauenstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.240