Literature DB >> 24515906

Morphological assessment of embryo viability.

Michael Abeyta1, Barry Behr2.   

Abstract

Morphological assessment is discussed in the context of significant literature at all stages of in vitro development, beginning with the oocyte and culminating at the blastocyst stage. Current evidence is used to debate the inclusion of commonly observed morphological features in grading schemes. The biological rationale behind observed phenomena such as multinucleation and fragmentation are also explored. Current limitations as well as technological advancements that increase our ability to assess viability are highlighted. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between developmental timing and assessment schemes. Failure to standardize assessment timing and inclusion criteria is glaring weaknesses of the literature that currently make consensus unattainable. Mounting evidence suggests that the future of static assessment is very likely to be influenced by information gathered from preimplantation genetic screening and other invasive techniques as well as from continuous monitoring tools such as time lapse. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515906     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Reprod Med        ISSN: 1526-4564            Impact factor:   1.303


  7 in total

1.  Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.

Authors:  Matthew D VerMilyea; Lei Tan; Joshua T Anthony; Joe Conaghan; Kristen Ivani; Marina Gvakharia; Robert Boostanfar; Valerie L Baker; Vaishali Suraj; Alice A Chen; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?

Authors:  J Barberet; C Bruno; E Valot; C Antunes-Nunes; L Jonval; J Chammas; C Choux; P Ginod; P Sagot; A Soudry-Faure; P Fauque
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Nucleation status of Day 2 pre-implantation embryos, acquired by time-lapse imaging during IVF, is associated with live birth.

Authors:  Shabana Sayed; Marte Myhre Reigstad; Bjørn Molt Petersen; Arne Schwennicke; Jon Wegner Hausken; Ritsa Storeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Alina Caragia; Alessia Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Time-lapse imaging derived morphokinetic variables reveal association with implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization: A retrospective study using data from transferred human embryos.

Authors:  Shabana Sayed; Marte Myhre Reigstad; Bjørn Molt Petersen; Arne Schwennicke; Jon Wegner Hausken; Ritsa Storeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Increased blastomere number is associated with higher live birth rate in day 3 embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lifeng Tian; Leizhen Xia; Hongbo Liu; Yan Kou; Zhihui Huang; Xingwu Wu; Lu Fan; Jialyu Huang; Qiongfang Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.