BACKGROUND: Tyrosinaemia type 1 (HT1) is a rare disorder of tyrosine metabolism leading to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment previously consisted of dietary restriction and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) but was transformed by the introduction of nitisinone in 1992. We describe the impact of nitisinone on the outcome and need for OLT in a single centre. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients treated for HT1 at Birmingham Children's Hospital from 1989-2009. RESULTS: Thirty eight patients were treated during the study period. Prior to 1992 6/7 (85.7 %) underwent OLT compared to 7/31 (22.6 %) after 1992 (p = 0.004) when nitisinone treatment was available. Furthermore, nitisinone-treated patients proceeding to OLT started treatment at a median age of 428 (86-821) days compared to 52 (2-990) days in those who did not (p = 0.004). Pre-OLT calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was similar in both groups but nitisinone prevented early decline after OLT (pre-nitisinone median 99.8 to 45.8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.02 versus nitisinone-treated group median 104.3 to 89.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.5). Urinary protein:creatinine ratio (PCR) fell post-OLT to within the normal range for those treated with nitisinone but remained elevated in those not treated with nitisinone. Tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) was normal or near normal in both groups pre-OLT and post-OLT. Hypertension was commoner and more severe in those not treated with nitisinone. CONCLUSIONS: Nitisinone reduces the need for OLT particularly when started early. For those progressing to OLT the use of prior nitisinone therapy results in a preservation of their subsequent renal function.
BACKGROUND:Tyrosinaemia type 1 (HT1) is a rare disorder of tyrosine metabolism leading to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment previously consisted of dietary restriction and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) but was transformed by the introduction of nitisinone in 1992. We describe the impact of nitisinone on the outcome and need for OLT in a single centre. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients treated for HT1 at Birmingham Children's Hospital from 1989-2009. RESULTS: Thirty eight patients were treated during the study period. Prior to 1992 6/7 (85.7 %) underwent OLT compared to 7/31 (22.6 %) after 1992 (p = 0.004) when nitisinone treatment was available. Furthermore, nitisinone-treated patients proceeding to OLT started treatment at a median age of 428 (86-821) days compared to 52 (2-990) days in those who did not (p = 0.004). Pre-OLT calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was similar in both groups but nitisinone prevented early decline after OLT (pre-nitisinone median 99.8 to 45.8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.02 versus nitisinone-treated group median 104.3 to 89.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.5). Urinary protein:creatinine ratio (PCR) fell post-OLT to within the normal range for those treated with nitisinone but remained elevated in those not treated with nitisinone. Tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) was normal or near normal in both groups pre-OLT and post-OLT. Hypertension was commoner and more severe in those not treated with nitisinone. CONCLUSIONS:Nitisinone reduces the need for OLT particularly when started early. For those progressing to OLT the use of prior nitisinone therapy results in a preservation of their subsequent renal function.
Authors: Francjan J van Spronsen; Charles M A Bijleveld; Bianca T van Maldegem; Frits A Wijburg Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: David C Bartlett; Mary Anne Preece; Elisabeth Holme; Carla Lloyd; Phil N Newsome; Patrick J McKiernan Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: Francesca Angileri; Anne Bergeron; Geneviève Morrow; Francine Lettre; George Gray; Tim Hutchin; Sarah Ball; Robert M Tanguay Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2015-02-15
Authors: Faysal Elgilani; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Meng Yin; Ianko D Iankov; Anisha Singh; Bruce Amiot; Piero Rinaldo; Ronald J Marler; Richard L Ehman; Markus Grompe; Joseph B Lillegard; Raymond D Hickey; Scott L Nyberg Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Jeffrey M Chinsky; Rani Singh; Can Ficicioglu; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Markus Grompe; Grant Mitchell; Susan E Waisbren; Muge Gucsavas-Calikoglu; Melissa P Wasserstein; Katie Coakley; C Ronald Scott Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Clara T Nicolas; Robert A Kaiser; Raymond D Hickey; Kari L Allen; Zeji Du; Caitlin J VanLith; Rebekah M Guthman; Bruce Amiot; Lukkana Suksanpaisan; Bing Han; Maria Giovanna Francipane; Amin Cheikhi; Huailei Jiang; Aditya Bansal; Mukesh K Pandey; Ishan Garg; Val Lowe; Aditya Bhagwate; Daniel O'Brien; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Timothy R DeGrado; Scott L Nyberg; Eric Lagasse; Joseph B Lillegard Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 6.698