Michael E Hughes1, John Peeler2, John B Hogenesch3, John Q Trojanowski4. 1. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia2Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis. 2. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 3. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia3Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 4. Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with no effective therapies. In 1984, the National Institute on Aging created the first 5 AD centers (ADCs) in an effort to coordinate research efforts into the pathology and treatment of the disease. Since that time, the ADC program has expanded to include 27 centers in major medical schools throughout the United States. A major aim of ADCs is to develop shared resources, such as tissue samples and patient populations, and thereby promote large-scale, high-impact studies that go beyond the capabilities of any single investigator or institution working in isolation. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ADC program over the past 25 years. DESIGN AND SETTING: We systematically harvested every article published by ADC investigators and used social network analysis to analyze copublication networks. RESULTS: A total of 12170 ADC papers were published from 1985 through 2012. The frequency of collaborations has increased greatly from the time that the ADCs were started until the present, even after the expansion of ADCs and the recruitment of new investigators plateaued. Moreover, the collaborations established within the context of the ADC program are increasingly interinstitutional, consistent with the overall goal of the program to catalyze multicenter research teams. Most important, we determined that collaborative multi-ADC research articles are consistently of higher impact than AD articles as a whole. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ADC program has successfully fostered high-impact, multiuniversity collaborations; we suggest that its structural and administrative features could be replicated in other fields of patient-oriented research.
IMPORTANCE: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with no effective therapies. In 1984, the National Institute on Aging created the first 5 AD centers (ADCs) in an effort to coordinate research efforts into the pathology and treatment of the disease. Since that time, the ADC program has expanded to include 27 centers in major medical schools throughout the United States. A major aim of ADCs is to develop shared resources, such as tissue samples and patient populations, and thereby promote large-scale, high-impact studies that go beyond the capabilities of any single investigator or institution working in isolation. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ADC program over the past 25 years. DESIGN AND SETTING: We systematically harvested every article published by ADC investigators and used social network analysis to analyze copublication networks. RESULTS: A total of 12170 ADC papers were published from 1985 through 2012. The frequency of collaborations has increased greatly from the time that the ADCs were started until the present, even after the expansion of ADCs and the recruitment of new investigators plateaued. Moreover, the collaborations established within the context of the ADC program are increasingly interinstitutional, consistent with the overall goal of the program to catalyze multicenter research teams. Most important, we determined that collaborative multi-ADC research articles are consistently of higher impact than AD articles as a whole. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ADC program has successfully fostered high-impact, multiuniversity collaborations; we suggest that its structural and administrative features could be replicated in other fields of patient-oriented research.
Authors: Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Michael C Donohue; Anthony Gamst; Rema Raman; Ronald G Thomas; Sarah Walter; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Laurel A Beckett; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Arthur W Toga; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Robert C Green; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: John C Morris; Sandra Weintraub; Helena C Chui; Jeffrey Cummings; Charles Decarli; Steven Ferris; Norman L Foster; Douglas Galasko; Neill Graff-Radford; Elaine R Peskind; Duane Beekly; Erin M Ramos; Walter A Kukull Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2006 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Sandra Weintraub; David Salmon; Nathaniel Mercaldo; Steven Ferris; Neill R Graff-Radford; Helena Chui; Jeffrey Cummings; Charles DeCarli; Norman L Foster; Douglas Galasko; Elaine Peskind; Woodrow Dietrich; Duane L Beekly; Walter A Kukull; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2009 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Michael D Hurd; Paco Martorell; Adeline Delavande; Kathleen J Mullen; Kenneth M Langa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Douglas A Luke; Bobbi J Carothers; Amar Dhand; Ryan A Bell; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Cathy C Sarli; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Ian J Saldanha; Tianjing Li; Cui Yang; Cesar Ugarte-Gil; George W Rutherford; Kay Dickersin Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Rebekah R Jacob; Ariella R Korn; Grace C Huang; Douglas Easterling; Daniel A Gundersen; Shoba Ramanadhan; Thuy Vu; Heather Angier; Ross C Brownson; Debra Haire-Joshu; April Y Oh; Robert Schnoll Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-04-13