Nathalie Auger1, Nicolas L Gilbert2, Ashley I Naimi3, Jay S Kaufman3. 1. Institut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, CanadaInstitut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, CanadaInstitut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada nathalie.auger@inspq.qc.ca. 2. Institut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, CanadaInstitut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 3. Institut national de sante publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Centre of the University of Montréal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Maternal and Infant Health Section, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetuses-at-risk denominators are commonly used in research on preterm stillbirth, but applications to postnatal outcomes such as preterm infant mortality are controversial. We evaluated whether biased associations between maternal risk factors and preterm infant mortality caused by stratification by preterm birth could be avoided using fetuses-at-risk risk ratios. METHODS: Data included 3 277 570 births drawn from the linked live birth-death file for Canada from 1990 through 2005. We used maternal age as the risk factor, and estimated the association with stillbirth, early neonatal, late neonatal and postneonatal mortality by gestational interval (22-24, 25-27, 28-31, 32-36, ≥37 weeks). Models were run using (i) log-binomial regression stratified by preterm gestational age, and (ii) unstratified log-binomial regression using fetuses-at-risk denominators. RESULTS: Extremes of maternal age were associated with higher mortality among term births. Among preterm births, the stratified model suggested a protective, null or attenuated association of extremes of maternal age with stillbirth, early, late and post neonatal mortality. The unstratified fetuses-at-risk model, however, resulted in the expected higher risk of mortality at extremes of maternal age for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses-at-risk regression can avoid paradoxical associations between maternal exposures and mortality of infants born early in gestation, caused by preterm birth stratification bias. The fetuses-at-risk approach can be extended through the first year of life, or potentially beyond, depending on the outcome and presence of unmeasured confounders associated with preterm birth.
BACKGROUND: Fetuses-at-risk denominators are commonly used in research on preterm stillbirth, but applications to postnatal outcomes such as preterm infant mortality are controversial. We evaluated whether biased associations between maternal risk factors and preterm infant mortality caused by stratification by preterm birth could be avoided using fetuses-at-risk risk ratios. METHODS: Data included 3 277 570 births drawn from the linked live birth-death file for Canada from 1990 through 2005. We used maternal age as the risk factor, and estimated the association with stillbirth, early neonatal, late neonatal and postneonatal mortality by gestational interval (22-24, 25-27, 28-31, 32-36, ≥37 weeks). Models were run using (i) log-binomial regression stratified by preterm gestational age, and (ii) unstratified log-binomial regression using fetuses-at-risk denominators. RESULTS: Extremes of maternal age were associated with higher mortality among term births. Among preterm births, the stratified model suggested a protective, null or attenuated association of extremes of maternal age with stillbirth, early, late and post neonatal mortality. The unstratified fetuses-at-risk model, however, resulted in the expected higher risk of mortality at extremes of maternal age for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses-at-risk regression can avoid paradoxical associations between maternal exposures and mortality of infants born early in gestation, caused by preterm birth stratification bias. The fetuses-at-risk approach can be extended through the first year of life, or potentially beyond, depending on the outcome and presence of unmeasured confounders associated with preterm birth.
Authors: Nathalie Auger; Alison L Park; Sam Harper; Mark Daniel; Federico Roncarolo; Robert W Platt Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: João Borges Fortes Filho; Marlene C Costa; Gabriela U Eckert; Paula G B Santos; Rita C Silveira; Renato S Procianoy Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Shahid M Husain; Ajay K Sinha; Catey Bunce; Puneet Arora; Wilson Lopez; Kwok S Mun; M Ashwin Reddy; Gillian G W Adams Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: K S Joseph; Kitaw Demissie; Robert W Platt; Cande V Ananth; Brian J McCarthy; Michael S Kramer Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2004-04-16 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Laust Mortensen; Clarisse Toa-Lou; André Costopoulos Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Nathalie Auger; Ashley I Naimi; William D Fraser; Jessica Healy-Profitós; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Anne Monique Nuyt; Jay S Kaufman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Nandita Perumal; Daniel E Roth; Donald C Cole; Stanley H Zlotkin; Johnna Perdrizet; Aluisio J D Barros; Ina S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Diego G Bassani Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Teresa Janevic; Jennifer Zeitlin; Nathalie Auger; Natalia N Egorova; Paul Hebert; Amy Balbierz; Elizabeth A Howell Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Suzan L Carmichael; Yair J Blumenfeld; Jonathan Mayo; Emily Wei; Jeffrey B Gould; David K Stevenson; Gary M Shaw Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tim A Bruckner; Samantha Gailey; Abhery Das; Alison Gemmill; Joan A Casey; Ralph Catalano; Gary M Shaw; Jennifer Zeitlin Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.007