Literature DB >> 24513575

Imaging through the pupal case of Drosophila melanogaster.

Mark B Keroles1, Sonya K Dusseault, Chuchu Liu, Masood R Mohammed, Christy M Vadakkan, Jessica H Amiel, Samantha N Abel, Elena R Bensoussan, Benjamin L Russell, James Baker.   

Abstract

The longstanding use of Drosophila as a model for cell and developmental biology has yielded an array of tools. Together, these techniques have enabled analysis of cell and developmental biology from a variety of methodological angles. Live imaging is an emerging method for observing dynamic cell processes, such as cell division or cell motility. Having isolated mutations in uncharacterized putative cell cycle proteins it became essential to observe mitosis in situ using live imaging. Most live imaging studies in Drosophila have focused on the embryonic stages that are accessible to manipulation and observation because of their small size and optical clarity. However, in these stages the cell cycle is unusual in that it lacks one or both of the gap phases. By contrast, cells of the pupal wing of Drosophila have a typical cell cycle and undergo a period of rapid mitosis spanning about 20 hr of pupal development. It is easy to identify and isolate pupae of the appropriate stage to catch mitosis in situ. Mounting intact pupae provided the best combination of tractability and durability during imaging, allowing experiments to run for several hours with minimal impact on cell and animal viability. The method allows observation of features as small as, or smaller than, fly chromosomes. Adjustment of microscope settings and the details of mounting, allowed extension of the preparation to visualize membrane dynamics of adjacent cells and fluorescently labeled proteins such as tubulin. This method works for all tested fluorescent proteins and can capture submicron scale features over a variety of time scales. While limited to the outer 20 µm of the pupa with a conventional confocal microscope, this approach to observing protein and cellular dynamics in pupal tissues in vivo may be generally useful in the study of cell and developmental biology in these tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24513575      PMCID: PMC4089621          DOI: 10.3791/51239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  Live imaging of synapse development and measuring protein dynamics using two-color fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching at Drosophila synapses.

Authors:  Petra Füger; Laila B Behrends; Sara Mertel; Stephan J Sigrist; Tobias M Rasse
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Developmental control of cell cycle regulators: a fly's perspective.

Authors:  B A Edgar; C F Lehner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Live imaging of multicolor-labeled cells in Drosophila.

Authors:  Maria Boulina; Hasitha Samarajeewa; James D Baker; Michael D Kim; Akira Chiba
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  2,2'-thiodiethanol: a new water soluble mounting medium for high resolution optical microscopy.

Authors:  Thorsten Staudt; Marion C Lang; Rebecca Medda; Johann Engelhardt; Stefan W Hell
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system.

Authors:  Jean Livet; Tamily A Weissman; Hyuno Kang; Ryan W Draft; Ju Lu; Robyn A Bennis; Joshua R Sanes; Jeff W Lichtman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Staging the metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S P Bainbridge; M Bownes
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1981-12

7.  Revisiting the Drosophila microchaete lineage: a novel intrinsically asymmetric cell division generates a glial cell.

Authors:  M Gho; Y Bellaïche; F Schweisguth
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Live imaging of wound inflammation in Drosophila embryos reveals key roles for small GTPases during in vivo cell migration.

Authors:  Brian Stramer; Will Wood; Michael J Galko; Michael J Redd; Antonio Jacinto; Susan M Parkhurst; Paul Martin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Live imaging of Drosophila gonad formation reveals roles for Six4 in regulating germline and somatic cell migration.

Authors:  Ivan B N Clark; Andrew P Jarman; David J Finnegan
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 1.978

10.  The roles of Fzy/Cdc20 and Fzr/Cdh1 in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in space and time.

Authors:  Jordan W Raff; Kim Jeffers; Jun-Yong Huang
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.