Sherry Emery1, Eman H Aly2, Lisa Vera3, Robert L Alexander4. 1. Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: slemery@uic.edu. 2. Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Cancer Prevention & Control, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California. 4. Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 80% of U.S. adults use the Internet, 65% of online adults use social media, and more than 60% use the Internet to find and share health information. PURPOSE: State tobacco control campaigns could effectively harness the powerful, inexpensive online messaging opportunities. Characterizing current Internet presence of state-sponsored tobacco control programs is an important first step toward informing such campaigns. METHODS: A research specialist searched the Internet for state-sponsored tobacco control resources and social media presence for each state in 2010 and 2011, to develop a resource inventory and observe change over 6 months. Data were analyzed and websites coded for interactivity and content between July and October 2011. RESULTS: Although all states have tobacco control websites, content and interactivity of those sites remain limited. State tobacco control program use of social media appears to be increasing over time. CONCLUSIONS: Information presented on the Internet by state-sponsored tobacco control programs remains modest and limited in interactivity, customization, and search engine optimization. These programs could take advantage of an important opportunity to communicate with the public about the health effects of tobacco use and available community cessation and prevention resources.
BACKGROUND: More than 80% of U.S. adults use the Internet, 65% of online adults use social media, and more than 60% use the Internet to find and share health information. PURPOSE: State tobacco control campaigns could effectively harness the powerful, inexpensive online messaging opportunities. Characterizing current Internet presence of state-sponsored tobacco control programs is an important first step toward informing such campaigns. METHODS: A research specialist searched the Internet for state-sponsored tobacco control resources and social media presence for each state in 2010 and 2011, to develop a resource inventory and observe change over 6 months. Data were analyzed and websites coded for interactivity and content between July and October 2011. RESULTS: Although all states have tobacco control websites, content and interactivity of those sites remain limited. State tobacco control program use of social media appears to be increasing over time. CONCLUSIONS: Information presented on the Internet by state-sponsored tobacco control programs remains modest and limited in interactivity, customization, and search engine optimization. These programs could take advantage of an important opportunity to communicate with the public about the health effects of tobacco use and available community cessation and prevention resources.
Authors: Sherry Emery; Melanie A Wakefield; Yvonne Terry-McElrath; Henry Saffer; Glen Szczypka; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Frank J Chaloupka; Brian Flay Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2005-07
Authors: Jamie F Chriqui; Kurt M Ribisl; Raedell M Wallace; Rebecca S Williams; Jean C O'Connor; Regina el Arculli Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Patricia Escobedo; Tess Boley Cruz; Kai-Ya Tsai; Jon-Patrick Allem; Daniel W Soto; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Monica Pattarroyo; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Frank J Chaloupka; Carla J Berg; Sherry L Emery; Lisa Henriksen; Pamela Ling; Scott J Leischow; Douglas A Luke; Michelle C Kegler; Shu-Hong Zhu; Elizabeth M Ginexi Journal: J Addict Behav Ther Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Kevin C Davis; Paul R Shafer; Robert Rodes; Annice Kim; Heather Hansen; Deesha Patel; Caryn Coln; Diane Beistle Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 5.428