Ashley H Hirai1, William M Sappenfield2, Michael D Kogan3, Wanda D Barfield4, David A Goodman4, Reem M Ghandour3, Michael C Lu3. 1. USDHHS, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Rockville, Maryland. Electronic address: ahirai@hrsa.gov. 2. University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Department of Community and Family Health, Tampa, Florida. 3. USDHHS, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Rockville, Maryland. 4. USDHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infant mortality rates (IMRs) are disproportionally high in the U.S. South; however, the proximate contributors that could inform regional action remain unclear. PURPOSE: To quantify the components of excess infant mortality in the U.S. South by maternal race/ethnicity, underlying cause of death, and gestational age. METHODS: U.S. Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Files 2007-2009 (analyzed in 2013) were used to compare IMRs between the South (U.S. Public Health Regions IV and VI) and all other regions combined. RESULTS: Compared to other regions, there were 1.18 excess infant deaths per 1000 live births in the South, representing about 1600 excess infant deaths annually. New Mexico and Texas did not have elevated IMRs relative to other regions; excess death rates among other states ranged from 0.62 per 1000 in Kentucky to 3.82 per 1000 in Mississippi. Racial/ethnic compositional differences, generally the greater proportion of non-Hispanic black births in the South, explained 59% of the overall regional difference; the remainder was mostly explained by higher IMRs among non-Hispanic whites. The leading causes of excess Southern infant mortality were sudden unexpected infant death (SUID; 36%, range=12% in Florida to 90% in Kentucky) and preterm-related death (22%, range= -71% in Kentucky to 51% in North Carolina). Higher rates of preterm birth, predominantly <34 weeks, accounted for most of the preterm contribution. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce excess Southern infant mortality, comprehensive strategies addressing SUID and preterm birth prevention for both non-Hispanic black and white births are needed, with state-level findings used to tailor state-specific efforts. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Infant mortality rates (IMRs) are disproportionally high in the U.S. South; however, the proximate contributors that could inform regional action remain unclear. PURPOSE: To quantify the components of excess infant mortality in the U.S. South by maternal race/ethnicity, underlying cause of death, and gestational age. METHODS: U.S. Period Linked Birth/InfantDeath Data Files 2007-2009 (analyzed in 2013) were used to compare IMRs between the South (U.S. Public Health Regions IV and VI) and all other regions combined. RESULTS: Compared to other regions, there were 1.18 excess infant deaths per 1000 live births in the South, representing about 1600 excess infant deaths annually. New Mexico and Texas did not have elevated IMRs relative to other regions; excess death rates among other states ranged from 0.62 per 1000 in Kentucky to 3.82 per 1000 in Mississippi. Racial/ethnic compositional differences, generally the greater proportion of non-Hispanic black births in the South, explained 59% of the overall regional difference; the remainder was mostly explained by higher IMRs among non-Hispanic whites. The leading causes of excess Southern infant mortality were sudden unexpected infantdeath (SUID; 36%, range=12% in Florida to 90% in Kentucky) and preterm-related death (22%, range= -71% in Kentucky to 51% in North Carolina). Higher rates of preterm birth, predominantly <34 weeks, accounted for most of the preterm contribution. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce excess Southern infant mortality, comprehensive strategies addressing SUID and preterm birth prevention for both non-Hispanic black and white births are needed, with state-level findings used to tailor state-specific efforts. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Bryan T Oshiro; Leslie Kowalewski; William Sappenfield; Caroline C Alter; Vani R Bettegowda; Rebecca Russell; John Curran; Lori Reeves; Marilyn Kacica; Nelson Andino; Peyton Mason-Marti; Dennis Crouse; Susan Knight; Karen Littlejohn; Sharyn Malatok; Donald J Dudley; Scott D Berns Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; T J Mathews; Sharon Kirmeyer; Michelle J K Osterman Journal: Natl Vital Stat Rep Date: 2010-08-09
Authors: Reem M Ghandour; Katherine Flaherty; Ashley Hirai; Vanessa Lee; Deborah Klein Walker; Michael C Lu Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2017-06
Authors: Ashley H Hirai; William M Sappenfield; Reem M Ghandour; Sara Donahue; Vanessa Lee; Michael C Lu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joedrecka S Brown Speights; Samantha Sittig Goldfarb; Brittny A Wells; Leslie Beitsch; Robert S Levine; George Rust Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Megan E Deichen Hansen; Brittny A James; Inam Sakinah; Joedrecka S Brown Speights; George Rust Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Allison N Kurti; Ryan Redner; Janice Y Bunn; Katherine Tang; Tyler Nighbor; Alexa A Lopez; Diana R Keith; Andrea C Villanti; Cassandra A Stanton; Diann E Gaalema; Nathan J Doogan; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Megan E Roberts; Julie Phillips; Maria A Parker; Amanda J Quisenberry; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 4.018