BACKGROUND: Ganetespib is a small molecule, nongeldanamycin HSP90 inhibitor with potent inhibitory effects on HSP90-dependent oncoproteins of relevance to breast cancer pathogenesis. We therefore tested ganetespib in an unselected cohort of patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with single agent ganetespib at 200 mg/m(2) once weekly for 3 weeks, on a 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression. The primary end point was ORR using Reponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a median age of 51(range, 38-70) years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (range, 0-1). Most patients had at least 2 previous lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Most common toxicities, largely grade 1/2, were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and hypersensitivity reaction. The ORR in this unselected population was 9%, with all responses coming from the subset of patients with HER2-positive MBC (2/13; 15%). One patient with TNBC had objective tumor regression in the lung metastases. The clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease > 6 months) was 9%, median progression-free survival was 7 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-19), and median overall survival was 46 weeks (95% CI, 27-not applicable). CONCLUSION: The study did not meet the prespecified criteria for ORR in the first stage of the Simon 2-stage model in this heavily pretreated unselected population of MBC. However, activity was observed in trastuzumab-refractory HER2-positive and TNBC. Ganetespib was well tolerated and responses in more targeted populations harboring specific HSP90-dependent oncoproteins justifies its further study, particularly as part of rational combinations.
BACKGROUND:Ganetespib is a small molecule, nongeldanamycinHSP90 inhibitor with potent inhibitory effects on HSP90-dependent oncoproteins of relevance to breast cancer pathogenesis. We therefore tested ganetespib in an unselected cohort of patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with single agent ganetespib at 200 mg/m(2) once weekly for 3 weeks, on a 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression. The primary end point was ORR using Reponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a median age of 51(range, 38-70) years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (range, 0-1). Most patients had at least 2 previous lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Most common toxicities, largely grade 1/2, were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and hypersensitivity reaction. The ORR in this unselected population was 9%, with all responses coming from the subset of patients with HER2-positive MBC (2/13; 15%). One patient with TNBC had objective tumor regression in the lung metastases. The clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease > 6 months) was 9%, median progression-free survival was 7 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-19), and median overall survival was 46 weeks (95% CI, 27-not applicable). CONCLUSION: The study did not meet the prespecified criteria for ORR in the first stage of the Simon 2-stage model in this heavily pretreated unselected population of MBC. However, activity was observed in trastuzumab-refractory HER2-positive and TNBC. Ganetespib was well tolerated and responses in more targeted populations harboring specific HSP90-dependent oncoproteins justifies its further study, particularly as part of rational combinations.
Authors: Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Giovanna Speranza; Larry Anderson; Alice P Chen; Khanh Do; Michelle Eugeni; Marcie Weil; Larry Rubinstein; Eva Majerova; Jerry Collins; Yvonne Horneffer; Lamin Juwara; Jennifer Zlott; Rachel Bishop; Barbara A Conley; Howard Streicher; Joseph Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow; Shivaani Kummar Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Joanna Matysiak; Małgorzata Juszczak; Monika M Karpińska; Ewa Langner; Katarzyna Walczak; Marta K Lemieszek; Alicja Skrzypek; Andrzej Niewiadomy; Wojciech Rzeski Journal: Mol Divers Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.943
Authors: Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Neil Iyengar; Patrick G Morris; Adriana D Corben; Sujata Patil; Muzaffar Akram; Russell Towers; Rita A Sakr; Tari A King; Larry Norton; Neal Rosen; Clifford Hudis; Shanu Modi Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Abena S Agyeman; Wesley J Jun; David A Proia; Caroline R Kim; Maxwell N Skor; Masha Kocherginsky; Suzanne D Conzen Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: David S Huang; Emmanuelle V LeBlanc; Tanvi Shekhar-Guturja; Nicole Robbins; Damian J Krysan; Juan Pizarro; Luke Whitesell; Leah E Cowen; Lauren E Brown Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Cheryl A London; Jaime Acquaviva; Donald L Smith; Manuel Sequeira; Luisa Shin Ogawa; Heather L Gardner; Louis Feo Bernabe; Misty D Bear; Sandra A Bechtel; David A Proia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 12.531