Jamie M Neely1, Tomislav Rovis. 1. Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Abstract
α,β-Unsaturated carboxylic acids undergo Rh(III)-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling with α,β-unsaturated O-pivaloyl oximes to provide substituted pyridines in good yield. The carboxylic acid, which is removed by decarboxylation, serves as a traceless activating group, giving 5-substituted pyridines with very high levels of regioselectivity. Mechanistic studies rule out a picolinic acid intermediate, and an isolable rhodium complex sheds further light on the reaction mechanism.
α,β-Unsaturated carboxylic acids undergo n class="Chemical">Rh(III)-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling with α,β-unsaturated O-pivaloyl oximes to provide substituted pyridines in good yield. The carboxylic acid, which is removed by decarboxylation, serves as a traceless activating group, giving 5-substituted pyridines with very high levels of regioselectivity. Mechanistic studies rule out a picolinic acid intermediate, and an isolable rhodium complex sheds further light on the reaction mechanism.
Substituted pyridines are among the most prevalent scaffolds encountered
in medicinal chemistry.[1] For this reason,
a wealth of research has focused on the construction of these heterocycles.[2] Nonetheless, access to desired substitution patterns
often remains a challenge with traditional multicomponent approaches
to n class="Chemical">pyridine synthesis.[3] Classic condensation
protocols rely on aldol and Michael-type steps, and the position and
identity of product substituents are dictated by the activating groups
required for reactivity.[4] Intermolecular
[2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions of nitriles and alkynes often afford regioisomeric
mixtures,[5] an obstacle that is typically
circumvented by tethering strategies.[6] Novel
approaches to diversely substituted pyridines are highly desirable,
and several impressive reports highlight the recent advances in this
field.[7]
Our efforts in the area of
pyridine synthesis have exploited n class="Chemical">rhodium-catalyzed coupling of α,β-unsaturated
oxime esters[8] and alkenes to access 6-substituted
pyridines.[9] During the course of this study,
we discovered that selectivity depends crucially on the nature of
the alkene substrate. Namely, activated alkenes react with exquisite
regioselectivity (eq 1) while unactivated alkenes
incorporate to give mixtures of regioisomeric products (eq 2). This
limitation prompted us to investigate whether the carboxylic acid
moiety of acrylic acid derivatives could serve as a ‘traceless’
activating group.[10] Indeed, this strategy
has been utilized by a number of research groups in the context of
C–H functionalization (eq 3).[11,12] In these examples,
carboxylate ligation imparts selectivity to the C–H activation
step, and the acid residue is ultimately cleaved via in situ decarboxylation. In a similar manner, we envisioned that the carboxylic
acid moiety would direct regioselective alkene incorporation and then
be removed by decarboxylation (eq 4).[13] This work would complement our previously reported rhodium-catalyzed
pyridine synthesis, since 5-substituted pyridines[14] could be prepared with high selectivity without the constraint
of activating group incorporation in the products.
We evaluated the feasibility of the proposed approach in the
reaction of α,β-unsaturated O-pivaloyl
oxime 1a and crotonic acid (2a) (Table 1). An initial screen with catalytic [RhCp*Cl2]2 and n class="Chemical">AgOAc as an oxidant identified hexafluoroisopropanol
(HFIP) as the optimal solvent, furnishing the desired 3aa in 60% yield (entry 1). Importantly, no 6-substituted regioisomer
(not shown) was observed. In an effort to avoid superstoichiometric
silver reagents, we conducted a screen of other oxidants, which revealed
potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) to
be modestly effective (entry 2). However, the desired pyridine 3aa was formed in a 1:1 mixture with picolinic acid 4aa, the nondecarboxylated product of the desired coupling.
Addition of a catalytic amount of silver p-toluenesulfonate
(AgOTs) afforded a 10:1 mixture of products (entry 3), and increasing
the amount of AgOTs gave full conversion to 3aa as a
single product (entry 4). Changing to [RhCpCFCl2]2 (CpCF = tetramethyl(trifluoromethyl)cyclopentadienyl)
was necessary for increasing reactivity with aryl acrylic acid substrates
such as 2k (Table 1, entries 5
and 6, and Supporting Information (SI)),
and we thus chose this catalyst for further development.
Table 1
Reaction Optimizationa
1.2 equiv of 2, 0.3 M.
Determined by 1H NMR.
Without K2S2O8.
1.2 equiv of 2, 0.3 M.Determined by 1H NMR.Without K2S2O8.Conditions: 1.2 equiv of 2, 0.3 M. 1 mmol scale. 0.5 equiv of AgOTs. In TFE at 74 °C.We examined the
scope of the reaction with these optimized conditions (Chart 1). Oxime esters 1 are easily synthesized
from the corresponding n class="Chemical">enones with hydroxylamine hydrochloride
and pivaloyl chloride. Knoevenagel condensation of the appropriate
aldehyde and malonic acid conveniently accesses acrylic acid derivatives 2.[15] The reaction of various α,β-unsaturated O-pivaloyl oximes (1) and nonenoic acid (2b) affords the 5-substituted pyridines in good yields.[16] Both primary and secondary alkyl acrylic acids
undergo the desired coupling efficiently; notably, alkyl chloride 2d is tolerated under the Ag(I) conditions. The acrylic acid
may also bear aryl or heteroaryl substitution (2h–2m). While the alkene contains two possible activating groups
in these cases, 5-substituted products are formed with complete regioselectivity.
Finally, acrylic acid (2n) also undergoes decarboxylative
coupling to furnish 2,3-disubstituted 3bn in good yield.
Chart 1
Reaction Scopea
Several key experiments contributed to our current understanding
of the reaction mechanism. We initially considered a pathway involving
decarboxylation of a picolinic acid intermediate 4 (eq
5, Scheme 1a). Ag(I)-catalyzed decarboxylation
is a well-known process[17] and has been
demonstrated with aryl[18] and heteroaryl[19] n class="Chemical">carboxylic acids at elevated temperatures. To
test this hypothesis, we synthesized possible intermediate 4ca and subjected it to the reaction conditions (eq 6). In the event,
we observed no formation of decarboxylated 3ca, ruling
out the intermediacy of picolinic acid 4ca.
Scheme 1
Mechanistic Studies
We
gained further mechanistic insight from isotope and stoichiometric
experiments (Scheme 1b–d). Reaction
of 1a and 2a in trifluoroethanol-d1 performed to ∼30% conversion results in partial deuteration
at the β-position of the remaining 1a, an observation
consistent with a reversible C–H activation step (eq 7). After
a mixture of 1a, 2a and a stoichiometric
amount of n class="Chemical">RhCp*(OAc)2 was heated for 90 min, the major
products observed are rhodium carboxylate complexes 5 and 6 (eq 8). Importantly, in 5 and 6, C–N bond formation and N–O bond cleavage
have taken place but decarboxylation has not yet occurred, clarifying
the timing of the decarboxylation step. Treatment of 5 and 6 with TMSCl affords chloride complex 7, an orange solid that is isolated by filtration. The structure given
in Scheme 1c was confirmed by single crystal
X-ray analysis of 7 (Figure 1).
Acetate complex 5 is converted to a 1:1 mixture of 3aa and 4aa upon heating (eq 9), implicating 5 as a common intermediate of both observed products. In agreement
with earlier observations, addition of AgOTs to the reaction leads
to exclusive formation of 3aa (eq 9). Interestingly,
heating chloride complex 7 results in a 1:3 mixture of 3aa and 4aa (eq 10), suggesting that X ligand
identity at this stage influences the divergence of reaction pathways
to the two products.
Figure 1
X-ray crystal structure of 7 with thermal ellipsoids
drawn at the 50% probability level.
X-ray crystal structure of 7 with thermal ellipsoids
drawn at the 50% probability level.Based on the described mechanistic observations, we propose
that pyridine and n class="Chemical">picolinic acid formation proceeds by the mechanism
depicted in Scheme 2. After generation of active
catalyst I, reversible C–H activation at the β-position
of 1a and ligand exchange provide cationic complex II. Migratory insertion and deprotonation give rhodacycle III. C–N bond formation and N–O bond cleavage
afford intermediate IV that is analogous to observable
complexes 5 and 6. From IV,
proton assisted ionization may occur to liberate either of the two
carboxylate ligands, giving cationic complex V or VI.[21] Deprotonation
of V leads to metallacycle VII, which can
undergo a retro [2 + 2 + 1] cycloaddition to extrude CO2 and provide pyridine 3aa and a Rh(I) species.[22] Alternatively, deprotonation of VI forms intermediate VIII from which β-hydride
elimination gives picolinic acid 4aa. Reductive elimination
of the resultant Rh(III) hydride gives a Rh(I) complex that is oxidized
to regenerate the active catalyst.
Scheme 2
Proposed Mechanism
In conclusion, we have developed a rhodium-catalyzed
decarboxylative coupling of α,β-unsaturated O-pivaloyl oximes and n class="Chemical">acrylic acid derivatives. This method takes
advantage of a carboxylic acid as a traceless activating group to
produce 5-substituted pyridines with complete regioselectivity. Mechanistic
studies suggest that decarboxylation does not occur via a picolinic
acid intermediate. We identified significant rhodacyclic intermediates
that clarify the order of C–N bond formation and decarboxylation.
Authors: Wiktor Szymanski; Bian Wu; Barbara Weiner; Stefaan de Wildeman; Ben L Feringa; Dick B Janssen Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Tiffany Piou; Fedor Romanov-Michailidis; Maria Romanova-Michaelides; Kelvin E Jackson; Natthawat Semakul; Trevor D Taggart; Brian S Newell; Christopher D Rithner; Robert S Paton; Tomislav Rovis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jennifer M Crawford; Kyle E Shelton; Emily K Reeves; Bryce K Sadarananda; Dipannita Kalyani Journal: Org Chem Front Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 5.281