Literature DB >> 24511201

Comparing the Effectiveness of 1064 vs. 810 nm Wavelength Endovascular Laser for Chronic Venous Insufficiency (Varicose Veins).

De-Yi Yu1, Hung-Chang Chen2, Shu-Ying Chang2, Yen-Chang Hsiao2, Cheng-Jen Chang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Endovenous Laser Photocoagulation (EVLP) at wavelengths of 1064 nm versus 810 nm for chronic venous insufficiency (varicose veins) in a large series of patients. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 108 patients with chronic venous insufficiency treated over a 8-year period. Subjects' ages ranged between 16 to 79 years; there were 83 females and 25 males, all of whom were Asian. Patients (n=54) received EVLP at wavelengths of 1064 nm (EVLP-1064 nm), Nd:YAG laser. Subsequent patients (n=54) received 810 nm (EVLP-810 nm), Diode laser. The primary efficacy measurement was the quantitative assessment of final outcome for 1064 nm versus 810 nm. Patients were monitored for adverse effects as well.
RESULTS: Complications were observed at 3 weeks (early), 6 weeks (late) and 6 months after EVLP. In both groups, the commonest complication in early convalescence was swelling. This was followed by Local paraesthesia, pigmentation, superficial burns, superficial phlebitis, and localized hematomas. At 6 weeks postoperatively, local paraesthesia, persistent hyperpigmentation, and minimal scarring were presented. These problems all disappeared completely after the 6 months study period. Based on chi-squared analysis, there were clinical, and statistically significant differences in the severity score of final results favoring the EVLP-810 nm group.
CONCLUSION: All patients achieved good or excellent improvement after EVLP-1064nm and EVLP-810nm. However, the difference of final outcome was significant, and indicates that improvement was greater in the Diode group. Further studies of different wavelengths and optimization of cryogen spray cooling (CSC) may lead to improved results in the eradication of varicose veins.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24511201      PMCID: PMC3916664          DOI: 10.5978/islsm.13-OR-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laser Ther        ISSN: 0898-5901


  18 in total

Review 1.  Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins.

Authors:  R J Min; N M Khilnani
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.888

2.  Effect of saphenous vein diameter on closure rate with ClosureFAST radiofrequency catheter.

Authors:  David Calcagno; John A Rossi; Chi Ha
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.089

Review 3.  Radiofrequency ablation of the long saphenous vein without high ligation versus high ligation and stripping for primary varicose veins: pros and cons.

Authors:  E John Harris
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Laser angioplasty.

Authors:  S Ashley; R C Kester
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Potential complications of intralesional laser photocoagulation for extensive vascular malformations.

Authors:  D M Fisher; C J Chang; J J Chua; Y R Chen; B M Achauer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Intralesional photocoagulation of vascular anomalies of the tongue.

Authors:  C J Chang; D M Fisher; Y R Chen
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-04

7.  Invaginated axial saphenectomy by a semirigid stripper: perforate-invaginate stripping.

Authors:  G Goren; A E Yellin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study).

Authors:  F Lurie; D Creton; B Eklof; L S Kabnick; R L Kistner; O Pichot; S Schuller-Petrovic; C Sessa
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Epidemiology of varicose veins.

Authors:  M J Callam
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping.

Authors:  J C Walsh; J J Bergan; S Beeman; T P Comer
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varices in the Same Patient.

Authors:  Orhan Bozoglan; Bulent Mese; Erdinc Eroglu; Hasan Cetin Ekerbiçer; Alptekin Yasim
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.