Literature DB >> 24511052

Prognostic factor analysis in core-binding factor-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

Hyun Ae Jung1, Chi Hoon Maeng, Silvia Park, Seok Jin Kim, Kihyun Kim, Jun Ho Jang, Chul Won Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases with t(8;21) or inv(16) have a favorable outcome, but the associated prognoses are heterogeneous and complicated by additional molecular aberrations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 to December 2010, 67 patients were diagnosed with t(8;21) or inv(16) AML. We collected cytogenetic variables and analyzed treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 67 patients, 51 (7.8%) had t(8;21) AML and 16 (2.4%) had inv(16) AML. Thrombocytopenia, and a high percentage of blasts in the peripheral blood and bone marrow were associated with poor overall survival. Twenty-five (49.0%) patients with t(8;21) had an additional chromosomal abnormality, while only six (37.5%) patients with inv(16) AML had a secondary chromosomal abnormality. The most common chromosomal abnormalities were deletion of the Y or X sex chromosomes.
CONCLUSION: Deletion of the Y chromosome may be a favorable prognostic factor in patients with core binding factor-positive AML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core-binding factor-positive AML; prognostic factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24511052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  6 in total

1.  Functional Properties of KIT Mutations Are Associated with Differential Clinical Outcomes and Response to Targeted Therapeutics in CBF Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Soheil Meshinchi; Jessica A Pollard; Katherine Tarlock; Todd A Alonzo; Yi-Cheng Wang; Robert B Gerbing; Rhonda Ries; Michael R Loken; Laura Pardo; Tiffany Hylkema; Jason Joaquin; Leela Sarukkai; Susana C Raimondi; Betsy Hirsch; Lillian Sung; Richard Aplenc; Irwin Bernstein; Alan S Gamis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Clinical Impact of Additional Cytogenetic Aberrations, cKIT and RAS Mutations, and Treatment Elements in Pediatric t(8;21)-AML: Results From an International Retrospective Study by the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group.

Authors:  Kim Klein; Gertjan Kaspers; Christine J Harrison; H Berna Beverloo; Ardine Reedijk; Mathilda Bongers; Jacqueline Cloos; Andrea Pession; Dirk Reinhardt; Martin Zimmerman; Ursula Creutzig; Michael Dworzak; Todd Alonzo; Donna Johnston; Betsy Hirsch; Michal Zapotocky; Barbara De Moerloose; Alcira Fynn; Vincent Lee; Takashi Taga; Akio Tawa; Anne Auvrignon; Bernward Zeller; Erik Forestier; Carmen Salgado; Walentyna Balwierz; Alexander Popa; Jeffrey Rubnitz; Susana Raimondi; Brenda Gibson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Detection of KIT mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Passant Badr; Ghada M Elsayed; Dalia Negm Eldin; Bahia Y Riad; Nayera Hamdy
Journal:  Leuk Res Rep       Date:  2018-07-21

Review 4.  Prognostic Significance of KIT Mutations in Core-Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenlan Chen; Hui Xie; Hongxiang Wang; Li Chen; Yi Sun; Zhichao Chen; Qiubai Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A CpG island methylator phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia independent of IDH mutations and associated with a favorable outcome.

Authors:  A D Kelly; H Kroeger; J Yamazaki; R Taby; F Neumann; S Yu; J T Lee; B Patel; Y Li; R He; S Liang; Y Lu; M Cesaroni; S A Pierce; S M Kornblau; C E Bueso-Ramos; F Ravandi; H M Kantarjian; J Jelinek; J-Pj Issa
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 12.883

6.  Clinical heterogeneity under induction with different dosages of cytarabine in core binding factor acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Jihong Zhang; Xiaoying Hua; Haiqian Li; Zhilin Wang; Bin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.