Literature DB >> 24510810

The impact of non-electrical factors on electrical gene transfer.

Jiemiao Hu1, Jeffry Cutrera, Shulin Li.   

Abstract

Electrical pulses directly and effectively boost both in vitro and in vivo gene transfer, but this process is greatly affected by non-electrical factors that exist during electroporation. These factors include, but are not limited to, the types of cells or tissues used, property of DNA, DNA formulation, and expressed protein. In this mini-review, we only describe and discuss a summary of DNA properties and selected DNA formulations on gene transfer via electroporation. The properties of DNA were selected for review because a substantial amount of remarkable work has been performed during the past few years but has received less notice than other works, although DNA properties appear to be critical for boosting electroporation delivery. The selected formulations will be covered in this mini-review because we are only interested in the simple formulations that could be used for cell or gene therapy via electroporation. Plus, there was an extensive review of DNA formulations in the first edition of this book. The formulations discussed in this mini-review represent novel developments in recent years and may impact electroporation significantly. These advancements in DNA formulations could prove to be important for gene delivery and disease treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510810      PMCID: PMC4116183          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9632-8_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  40 in total

1.  Multilineage cells from adipose tissue as gene delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Kouki Morizono; Daniel A De Ugarte; Min Zhu; Pat Zuk; Amir Elbarbary; Peter Ashjian; Prosper Benhaim; Irvin S Y Chen; Marc H Hedrick
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.695

2.  The role of electrophoresis in gene electrotransfer.

Authors:  M Pavlin; K Flisar; M Kanduser
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Skin-targeted gene transfer using in vivo electroporation.

Authors:  H Maruyama; K Ataka; N Higuchi; F Sakamoto; F Gejyo; J Miyazaki
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Short noncoding DNA fragment improve efficiencies of in vivo electroporation-mediated gene transfer.

Authors:  Jinliang Peng; Yonggang Zhao; Junhua Mai; Wei Guo; Yuhong Xu
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.565

5.  Plasmid DNA size does affect nonviral gene delivery efficiency in stem cells.

Authors:  Sofia Ribeiro; Juergen Mairhofer; Catarina Madeira; Maria Margarida Diogo; Cláudia Lobato da Silva; Gabriel Monteiro; Reingard Grabherr; Joaquim M Cabral
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses.

Authors:  L M Mir; M F Bureau; J Gehl; R Rangara; D Rouy; J M Caillaud; P Delaere; D Branellec; B Schwartz; D Scherman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A polymerase chain reaction-based method for constructing a linear vector with site-specific DNA methylation.

Authors:  Toshiya Arakawa; Tohru Ohta; Yoshihiro Abiko; Miki Okayama; Itaru Mizoguchi; Taishin Takuma
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Efficacy of MRI visible iron oxide nanoparticles in delivering minicircle DNA into liver via intrabiliary infusion.

Authors:  Lin Gao; Lisi Xie; Xiaojing Long; Zhiyong Wang; Cheng-Yi He; Zhi-Ying Chen; Lei Zhang; Xiang Nan; Hulong Lei; Xin Liu; Gang Liu; Jian Lu; Bensheng Qiu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Efficiency of high- and low-voltage pulse combinations for gene electrotransfer in muscle, liver, tumor, and skin.

Authors:  F M André; J Gehl; G Sersa; V Préat; P Hojman; J Eriksen; M Golzio; M Cemazar; N Pavselj; M-P Rols; D Miklavcic; E Neumann; J Teissié; L M Mir
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.793

10.  "Direct cloning in Lactobacillus plantarum: electroporation with non-methylated plasmid DNA enhances transformation efficiency and makes shuttle vectors obsolete".

Authors:  Katharina Spath; Stefan Heinl; Reingard Grabherr
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficient Non-viral Gene Delivery into Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Minicircle Sleeping Beauty Transposon Vectors.

Authors:  Marta Holstein; Cristina Mesa-Nuñez; Csaba Miskey; Elena Almarza; Valentina Poletti; Marco Schmeer; Esther Grueso; Juan Carlos Ordóñez Flores; Dennis Kobelt; Wolfgang Walther; Manish K Aneja; Johannes Geiger; Halvard B Bonig; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Martin Schleef; Carsten Rudolph; Fulvio Mavilio; Juan A Bueren; Guillermo Guenechea; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  MYBPC1, an Emerging Myopathic Gene: What We Know and What We Need to Learn.

Authors:  Janelle Geist; Aikaterini Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.