Literature DB >> 24510739

Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy.

Jodie M Dodd1, Andrea R Deussen, Rosalie M Grivell, Caroline A Crowther.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of birth for women with an otherwise uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term is uncertain, with clinical support for both elective delivery at 37 weeks, as well as expectant management (awaiting the spontaneous onset of labour).
OBJECTIVES: To assess a policy of elective delivery from 37 weeks' gestation compared with an expectant approach for women with an otherwise uncomplicated twin pregnancy. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (12 December 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who underwent elective delivery from 37 weeks' gestation in a twin pregnancy with outcomes in controls who were managed expectantly. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, trial quality and extracted data from the included trials. MAIN
RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials comparing elective birth at 37 weeks for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy, with expectant management were included, involving 271 women and 542 infants. One trial was at an overall low risk of bias, and one trial was at unclear risk of selection bias, performance bias and detection bias.There were no statistically significant differences identified between a policy of elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation and expectant management with regards to birth by caesarean section (two studies; 271 participants; risk ratio (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.32); perinatal death or serious perinatal morbidity (two studies; 542 infants; RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.01 to 8.35); or maternal death or serious maternal morbidity (one study; 235 women; RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.06 to 1.38).There were no statistically significant differences identified for the pre-specified secondary maternal and infant review outcomes reported by these two trials between the two treatment policies (including for: haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion; instrumental vaginal birth; meconium-stained liquor; Apgar score less than seven at five minutes; admission to neonatal intensive care; birthweight less than 2500 g; neonatal encephalopathy; and respiratory distress syndrome). While not a pre-specified review outcome, elective birth at 37 weeks, compared with expectant management, was shown to significantly reduce the risk of infants being born with a birthweight less than the third centile (one study; 470 infants; RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.68). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Early birth at 37 weeks' gestation compared with ongoing expectant management for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of harms, findings which are consistent with the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations which advocate birth for women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy at 37 + 0 weeks' gestation. It is unlikely that sufficient clinical equipoise exists to allow for the randomisation of women to a later gestational age at birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510739     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003582.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  9 in total

1.  Induction of Labour. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k, AWMF Registry No. 015-088, December 2020).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Irene Hösli; Ulrich Pecks; Philipp Reif; Ralf L Schild; Markus Schmidt; Dagmar Schmitz; Christiane Schwarz; Daniel Surbek; Michael Abou-Dakn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Twin Births in Medicaid: Prevalence, Outcomes, Utilization, and Cost in Four States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Paul Johnson; Caitlin Cross-Barnet
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-05

Review 3.  Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Jon F Barrett; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 4.  Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes and their infants.

Authors:  Linda M Biesty; Aoife M Egan; Fidelma Dunne; Valerie Smith; Pauline Meskell; Eugene Dempsey; G Meabh Ni Bhuinneain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 5.  Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.

Authors:  Linda M Biesty; Aoife M Egan; Fidelma Dunne; Eugene Dempsey; Pauline Meskell; Valerie Smith; G Meabh Ni Bhuinneain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-05

6.  Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Jonsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: what is the optimal gestational age for delivery according to chorionicity?

Authors:  Hye-Jung Lee; Soo Hyun Kim; Kylie Hae-Jin Chang; Ji-Hee Sung; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-01-15

Review 8.  Recent advances in the induction of labor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.

Authors:  Dominiek Coates; Angela Makris; Christine Catling; Amanda Henry; Vanessa Scarf; Nicole Watts; Deborah Fox; Purshaiyna Thirukumar; Vincent Wong; Hamish Russell; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.