Literature DB >> 24510400

Contemporary prevalence of pretreatment urinary, sexual, hormonal, and bowel dysfunction: Defining the population at risk for harms of prostate cancer treatment.

Matthew J Resnick1, Daniel A Barocas, Alicia K Morgans, Sharon E Phillips, Vivien W Chen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Michael Goodman, Sheldon Greenfield, Ann S Hamilton, Karen E Hoffman, Sherri H Kaplan, Lisa E Paddock, Antoinette M Stroup, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Tatsuki Koyama, David F Penson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the prevalence of pretreatment urinary, sexual, hormonal, and bowel dysfunction in a contemporary, population-based prostate cancer cohort. They also explored the associations between baseline function and age, comorbidity, and timing of baseline survey completion with respect to treatment.
METHODS: The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study is a population-based, prospective cohort study that enrolled 3691 men with incident prostate cancer during 2011 and 2012. Pretreatment function was ascertained using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 (EPIC-26). Data were stratified by age, comorbidity, and timing of baseline survey completion with respect to treatment. Unadjusted and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relations between exposures and pretreatment function.
RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, the study cohort comprised 3072 men. A strikingly high proportion of men reported inability to obtain erections satisfactory for intercourse (45%) and some degree of urinary incontinence (17%) at baseline. Sexual function was particularly age-sensitive, with patients aged ≤60 years reporting summary scores in excess of 30 points higher than patients aged ≥75 years (P < .001). Compared with the healthiest men, highly comorbid patients reported less favorable function in each domain, including urinary incontinence (summary score, 89.5 vs 74.1; P < .001) and sexual function (summary score, 70.8 vs 32.9; P < .001). Although statistically significant differences in summary scores were identified between patients who completed the baseline questionnaire before treatment (52%) versus after treatment (48%), the absolute differences were small (range, 1-3 points).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer exhibit a wide distribution of pretreatment function. The current data may be used to redefine the population "at risk" for treatment-related harms.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bowel function; prostate cancer; quality of life; sexual function; urinary function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510400      PMCID: PMC4930672          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  28 in total

1.  Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Hunter Wessells; Jennifer Pace; Matt Schonlau; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-23

2.  Why do men choose one treatment over another?: a review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Scott D Ramsey; David F Penson; Ingrid J Hall; Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonard Stroud; Judith W Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Alayne D Markland; Holly E Richter; Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul Eggers; John W Kusek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Validation study of retrospective recall of disease-targeted function: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  J Legler; A L Potosky; F D Gilliland; J W Eley; J L Stanford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Assessment of prognosis with the total illness burden index for prostate cancer: aiding clinicians in treatment choice.

Authors:  Mark S Litwin; Sheldon Greenfield; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Jeanette M Broering; Sherrie H Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The CaPSURE database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

Authors:  D P Lubeck; M S Litwin; J M Henning; D M Stier; P Mazonson; R Fisk; P R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Lower urinary tract symptoms and diet quality: findings from the 2000-2001 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Bradley A Erickson; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Xin Liu; Benjamin N Breyer; Karl J Kreder; Peter Cram
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Using a population-based observational cohort study to address difficult comparative effectiveness research questions: the CEASAR study.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Vivien Chen; Matthew Cooperberg; Michael Goodman; John J Graff; Sheldon Greenfield; Ann Hamilton; Karen Hoffman; Sherrie Kaplan; Tatsuki Koyama; Alicia Morgans; Lisa E Paddock; Sharon Phillips; Matthew J Resnick; Antoinette Stroup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; David F Penson
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.744

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dosimetric benefits of hemigland stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Sang J Park; Christopher R King; Kristofer Roberts; Patrick A Kupelian; Michael L Steinberg; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Treatment Decision Regret Among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Mary Lo; Jack A Clark; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; David F Penson; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; Ann S Hamilton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; JoAnn Alvarez; Matthew J Resnick; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Mark D Tyson; Ralph Conwill; Dan McCollum; Matthew R Cooperberg; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Sherrie H Kaplan; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette M Stroup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; David F Penson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Effect of timing of postprostatectomy radiation on functional outcomes.

Authors:  Heather L Huelster; Aaron A Laviana; Daniel D Joyce; Li-Ching Huang; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Ralph Conwill; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Influence of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on work status and working life 3 years after surgery.

Authors:  Sigrun Dahl; Jon Håvard Loge; Viktor Berge; Alv Andreas Dahl; Milada Cvancarova; Sophie Dorothea Fosså
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  A Longitudinal Study of Predictors of Sexual Dysfunction in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Chi-Hsiung E Wang; David E Victorson; Brian T Helfand; Kristian R Novakovic; Charles B Brendler; Jeffrey A Albaugh
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  Cancer Related Fatigue and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andreas Charalambous; Christiana Kouta
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.

Authors:  Athene Lane; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Tim J Peters; Jane Blazeby; Kerry N L Avery; Daniel Dedman; Liz Down; Malcolm D Mason; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Racial and Ethnic Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Prior to Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Stephanie R Reading; Kimberly R Porter; Jeffrey M Slezak; Teresa N Harrison; Joy S Gelfond; Gary W Chien; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.491

10.  Changes in Nocturia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kyung Jae Hur; Kyu Won Lee; Su Jin Kim; Kang Sup Kim; Woong Jin Bae; Hyuck Jin Cho; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Tae Kon Hwang; Sae Woong Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.