PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The Lamiidae, a clade composed of approximately 15% of all flowering plants, consists of five orders: Boraginales, Gentianales, Garryales, Lamiales, and Solanales; and four families unplaced in an order: Icacinaceae, Metteniusiaceae, Oncothecaceae, and Vahliaceae. Our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of Lamiidae has improved significantly in recent years, however, relationships among the orders and unplaced families of the clade remain partly unresolved. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of the Lamiidae based on an expanded sampling, including all families together, for the first time, in a single phylogenetic analyses. METHODS: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Analyses included nine plastid regions (atpB, matK, ndhF, psbBTNH, rbcL, rps4, rps16, trnL-F, and trnV-atpE) and the mitochondrial rps3 region, and 129 samples representing all orders and unplaced families of Lamiidae. KEY RESULTS: Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian trees provide good support for Boraginales sister to Lamiales, with successive outgroups (Solanales + Vahlia) and Gentianales, together comprising the core Lamiidae. Early branching patterns are less well supported, with Garryales only poorly supported as sister to the above 'core' and a weakly supported clade composed of Icacinaceae, Metteniusaceae, and Oncothecaceae sister to all other Lamiidae. CONCLUSIONS: Our phylogeny of Lamiidae reveals increased resolution and support for internal relationships that have remained elusive. Within Lamiales, greater resolution also is obtained, but some family interrelationships remain a challenge.
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The Lamiidae, a clade composed of approximately 15% of all flowering plants, consists of five orders: Boraginales, Gentianales, Garryales, Lamiales, and Solanales; and four families unplaced in an order: Icacinaceae, Metteniusiaceae, Oncothecaceae, and Vahliaceae. Our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of Lamiidae has improved significantly in recent years, however, relationships among the orders and unplaced families of the clade remain partly unresolved. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of the Lamiidae based on an expanded sampling, including all families together, for the first time, in a single phylogenetic analyses. METHODS: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Analyses included nine plastid regions (atpB, matK, ndhF, psbBTNH, rbcL, rps4, rps16, trnL-F, and trnV-atpE) and the mitochondrial rps3 region, and 129 samples representing all orders and unplaced families of Lamiidae. KEY RESULTS: Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian trees provide good support for Boraginales sister to Lamiales, with successive outgroups (Solanales + Vahlia) and Gentianales, together comprising the core Lamiidae. Early branching patterns are less well supported, with Garryales only poorly supported as sister to the above 'core' and a weakly supported clade composed of Icacinaceae, Metteniusaceae, and Oncothecaceae sister to all other Lamiidae. CONCLUSIONS: Our phylogeny of Lamiidae reveals increased resolution and support for internal relationships that have remained elusive. Within Lamiales, greater resolution also is obtained, but some family interrelationships remain a challenge.
Authors: Patrick P Edger; Ronald Smith; Michael R McKain; Arielle M Cooley; Mario Vallejo-Marin; Yaowu Yuan; Adam J Bewick; Lexiang Ji; Adrian E Platts; Megan J Bowman; Kevin L Childs; Jacob D Washburn; Robert J Schmitz; Gregory D Smith; J Chris Pires; Joshua R Puzey Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Zhenzhen Yang; Eric K Wafula; Loren A Honaas; Huiting Zhang; Malay Das; Monica Fernandez-Aparicio; Kan Huang; Pradeepa C G Bandaranayake; Biao Wu; Joshua P Der; Christopher R Clarke; Paula E Ralph; Lena Landherr; Naomi S Altman; Michael P Timko; John I Yoder; James H Westwood; Claude W dePamphilis Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2014-12-21 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Niklas Wikström; Kent Kainulainen; Sylvain G Razafimandimbison; Jenny E E Smedmark; Birgitta Bremer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Saura R Silva; Yani C A Diaz; Helen Alves Penha; Daniel G Pinheiro; Camila C Fernandes; Vitor F O Miranda; Todd P Michael; Alessandro M Varani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bo Li; Philip D Cantino; Richard G Olmstead; Gemma L C Bramley; Chun-Lei Xiang; Zhong-Hui Ma; Yun-Hong Tan; Dian-Xiang Zhang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 4.379