Literature DB >> 2450966

Comparative studies on structural and antigenic properties of two serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus.

H Becht1, H Müller, H K Müller.   

Abstract

The electrophoretic mobilities of the two genome segments and the structural polypeptides of the chicken strain Cu-1 (serotype I) and the turkey isolate 23/82 (serotype II) of infectious bursal disease virus were compared. There is a close antigenic relationship between the smaller of the two major structural proteins (32K) of both strains. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are induced by the larger protein (40K in Cu-1) which differentiates between the two serotypes. The 40K structural protein also has epitopes which do not induce neutralizing antibodies and which are common to both strains. There is evidence that the antigenic region responsible for the production of neutralizing antibodies is highly conformation-dependent. Passively administered neutralizing antibodies directed against the 40K structural polypeptide of Cu-1 confer protective immunity to susceptible chickens, whereas antibodies directed against the 32K structural protein do not have any protective effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2450966     DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-69-3-631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Virol        ISSN: 0022-1317            Impact factor:   3.891


  36 in total

1.  Naturally occurring-neutralizing monoclonal antibody escape variants define the epidemiology of infectious bursal disease viruses in the United States.

Authors:  D B Snyder; V N Vakharia; P K Savage
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Full-length sequence analysis of four IBDV strains with different pathogenicities.

Authors:  Daniel Petkov; Erich Linnemann; Darrell R Kapczynski; Holly S Sellers
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Molecular epizootiology of infectious bursal disease (IBD) in Korea.

Authors:  Woo-Jin Jeon; Kang-Seuk Choi; Dong-Woo Lee; Eun-Kyoung Lee; Sang-Ho Cha; Sun-Hee Cho; Jun-Hun Kwon; Yeo-sung Yoon; Sun-Joong Kim; Jae-Hong Kim; Hyuk-Joon Kwon
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.332

4.  Nucleotide sequence analysis of the serotype-specific epitope of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus.

Authors:  A Pryde; W T Melvin; A L Munro
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 5.  Infectious bursal disease virus: a review of molecular basis for variations in antigenicity and virulence.

Authors:  M M Nagarajan; F S Kibenge
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.310

6.  Detection of infectious bursal disease viruses by using cloned cDNA probes.

Authors:  D J Jackwood; F S Kibenge; C C Mercado
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  C terminus of infectious bursal disease virus major capsid protein VP2 is involved in definition of the T number for capsid assembly.

Authors:  J R Castón; J L Martínez-Torrecuadrada; A Maraver; E Lombardo; J F Rodríguez; J I Casal; J L Carrascosa
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Mapping of cross-reacting and serotype-specific epitopes on the VP3 structural protein of the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).

Authors:  G N Mahardika; H Becht
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.574

9.  A recombinant Newcastle disease virus (NDV) expressing VP2 protein of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) protects against NDV and IBDV.

Authors:  Zhuhui Huang; Subbiah Elankumaran; Abdul S Yunus; Siba K Samal
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Biological roles of the major capsid proteins and relationships between the two existing serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  S K Reddy; A Silim; M J Ratcliffe
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.