PURPOSE: To quantify the physiological responses, time-motion characteristics, and reproducibility of various speed-endurance-production (SEP) and speed-endurance-maintenance (SEM) drills. METHODS: Sixteen elite male youth soccer players completed 4 drills: SEP 1 v 1 small-sided game (SSG), SEP running drill, SEM 2 v 2 SSG, and SEM running drill. Heart-rate response, blood lactate concentration, subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and time-motion characteristics were recorded for each drill. RESULTS: The SEP and SEM running drills elicited greater (P < .05) heart-rate responses, blood lactate concentrations, and RPE than the respective SSGs (ES 1.1-1.4 and 1.0-3.2). Players covered less (P < .01) total distance and high-intensity distance in the SEP and SEM SSGs than in the respective running drills (ES 6.0-22.1 and 3.0-18.4). Greater distances (P < .01) were covered in high to maximum acceleration/deceleration bands during the SEP and SEM SSGs than the respective running drills (ES 2.6-4.6 and 2.3-4.8). The SEP SSG and generic running protocols produced greater (P < .05) blood lactate concentrations than the respective SEM protocols (ES 1.2-1.7). Small to moderate test-retest variability was observed for heart-rate response (CV 0.9-1.9%), RPE (CV 2.9-5.7%), and blood lactate concentration (CV 9.9-14.4%); moderate to large test-retest variability was observed for high-intensity-running parameters (CV > 11.3%) and the majority of accelerations/deceleration distances (CV > 9.8%) for each drill. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate the potential to tax the anaerobic energy system to different extents using speed-endurance SSGs and that SSGs elicit greater acceleration/ deceleration load than generic running drills.
PURPOSE: To quantify the physiological responses, time-motion characteristics, and reproducibility of various speed-endurance-production (SEP) and speed-endurance-maintenance (SEM) drills. METHODS: Sixteen elite male youth soccer players completed 4 drills: SEP 1 v 1 small-sided game (SSG), SEP running drill, SEM 2 v 2 SSG, and SEM running drill. Heart-rate response, blood lactate concentration, subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and time-motion characteristics were recorded for each drill. RESULTS: The SEP and SEM running drills elicited greater (P < .05) heart-rate responses, blood lactate concentrations, and RPE than the respective SSGs (ES 1.1-1.4 and 1.0-3.2). Players covered less (P < .01) total distance and high-intensity distance in the SEP and SEM SSGs than in the respective running drills (ES 6.0-22.1 and 3.0-18.4). Greater distances (P < .01) were covered in high to maximum acceleration/deceleration bands during the SEP and SEM SSGs than the respective running drills (ES 2.6-4.6 and 2.3-4.8). The SEP SSG and generic running protocols produced greater (P < .05) blood lactate concentrations than the respective SEM protocols (ES 1.2-1.7). Small to moderate test-retest variability was observed for heart-rate response (CV 0.9-1.9%), RPE (CV 2.9-5.7%), and blood lactate concentration (CV 9.9-14.4%); moderate to large test-retest variability was observed for high-intensity-running parameters (CV > 11.3%) and the majority of accelerations/deceleration distances (CV > 9.8%) for each drill. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate the potential to tax the anaerobic energy system to different extents using speed-endurance SSGs and that SSGs elicit greater acceleration/ deceleration load than generic running drills.
Authors: Jason Moran; Richard C Blagrove; Benjamin Drury; John F T Fernandes; Kevin Paxton; Helmi Chaabene; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Alexandre Moreira; Marcelo Saldanha Aoki; Chris Carling; Rafael Alan Rodrigues Lopes; Ademir Felipe Schultz de Arruda; Marcelo Lima; Umberto Cesar Correa; Paul S Bradley Journal: Asian J Sports Med Date: 2016-10-16
Authors: Filipe Manuel Clemente; Alireza Rabbani; Mehdi Kargarfard; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dan Fransson; Tobias Schmidt Nielsen; Karl Olsson; Tobias Christensson; Paul S Bradley; Ioannis G Fatouros; Peter Krustrup; Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg; Magni Mohr Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Paweł Chmura; Marek Konefał; Jan Chmura; Edward Kowalczuk; Tomasz Zając; Andrzej Rokita; Marcin Andrzejewski Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2018-03-31 Impact factor: 2.806