Literature DB >> 24508712

Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.

Rajesh Ghosh1, Sanjay Gupta2.   

Abstract

Recent developments in acetabular implants suggest flexible, alternative bearing material that may reduce wear and peri-prosthetic bone resorption. The goal of this study was to investigate the deviations in load transfer and the extent of bone remodelling around composite acetabular components having different geometries, material properties and implant-bone interface conditions, using 3-D FE analysis and bone remodelling algorithm. Variation in prosthesis type and implant-bone interface conditions affected peri-prosthetic strain distribution and bone remodelling. Strain shielding was considerably higher for bonded implant-bone interface condition as compared to debonded implant-bone interface condition. The average bone deformation (0.133mm) for horseshoe-shaped CFR-PEEK (resembling MITCH PCR(TM) cup) was very close to that of the intact acetabulum (0.135mm) at comparable locations. A reduction in bone density of 21-50% was predicted within the acetabulum for the implant resembling Cambridge cup, having bonded interface. For debonded interface condition, bone density increase of ~55% was observed in the supero-posterior part of acetabulum, whereas bone density reductions were low (1-20%) in other locations. Bone density reductions were considerably less (2-4%) for horseshoe-shaped CFR-PEEK component. Moreover, an increase in bone density of 1-87% was predicted around the acetabulum. Compared to the horseshoe-shaped design, the hemispherical design exacerbated bone resorption. Results indicated that the thickness of the acetabular component played a crucial role in the implant induced bone adaptation. The horseshoe-shaped CFR-PEEK component of 3mm thickness seemed a better alternative bearing surface than other designs, with regard to strain shielding, bone deformation and bone remodelling.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone remodelling; Composite acetabular component; Finite element analysis; Hip prosthesis; Pelvic bone

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24508712     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of failure of cemented polyethylene acetabular component due to bone remodeling: A finite element study.

Authors:  Rajesh Ghosh
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-29

2.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  New alternate bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Preston W Grieco; Scott Pascal; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Sarah G Stroud; Neil P Sheth; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-27

4.  Highly Porous Titanium Cups versus Hydroxyapatite-Coated Sockets: Midterm Results in Metachronous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Castagnini; Barbara Bordini; Makiko Yorifuji; Federico Giardina; Simone Natali; Francesco Pardo; Francesco Traina
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Analysis of peripheral bone reconstruction after the failure of hip osteonecrosis treatment with porous tantalum rod implantation.

Authors:  Weilu Liu; Yong Hu; Zhifa Huang; Zhanjun Shi; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Raffa; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A preclinical numerical assessment of a polyetheretherketone femoral component in total knee arthroplasty during gait.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Dennis Janssen; Adam Briscoe; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.