Literature DB >> 24508427

Association of abnormal hind-limb postures and back arch with gait abnormality in dairy cattle.

A C Hoffman1, D A Moore2, J Vanegas3, J R Wenz1.   

Abstract

Detection of lameness in individual cows is important for the prompt treatment of this painful and production-limiting disease. Current methods for lameness detection involve watching cows walk for several strides. If clinical signs predictive of lameness could be observed more conveniently, as cows are undergoing regularly scheduled examinations while standing, detection levels could increase. The objective of this study was to assess the association between postures observed while cows are standing in stanchions and clinical lameness evaluated by locomotion scoring, and to evaluate the observation of these postures as a test for lameness. The study included 1,243 cows from 4 farms. Cows were observed while standing in stanchions for regularly scheduled management procedures and the presence of arched back and cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures were recorded. The same cows were locomotion-scored as they exited the milking parlor. The proportion of cows observed with arched back and cow-hocked and favored-limb postures increased with increasing severity of lameness (higher locomotion score) but did not increase for the wide-stance posture. For the presence of these postures as a test for lameness (locomotion score ≥3), sensitivity and specificity were 0.63 and 0.64 for back arch, 0.54 and 0.57 for cow hocks, and 0.05 and 0.98 for favored limb. Back-arched, cow-hocked, and favored limb postures were associated with lameness but were not highly sensitive or specific as diagnostic tests. However, observation of back arch may be useful to identify cows needing further examination.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back arch; cow hocked; lameness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24508427     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Experimentally induced subclinical mastitis: are lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid eliciting similar pain responses?

Authors:  Annalisa Elena Jolanda Giovannini; Bart Henricus Philippus van den Borne; Samantha Kay Wall; Olga Wellnitz; Rupert Max Bruckmaier; Claudia Spadavecchia
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 2.  A Review: Development of Computer Vision-Based Lameness Detection for Dairy Cows and Discussion of the Practical Applications.

Authors:  Xi Kang; Xu Dong Zhang; Gang Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain.

Authors:  Yolanda Trillo; Luis Angel Quintela; Mónica Barrio; Juan José Becerra; Ana Isabel Peña; Marcos Vigo; Pedro Garcia Herradon
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2017-09-26

4.  The role of claw deformation and claw size on goat lameness.

Authors:  Inês de Grenho Gonçalves Ajuda; Monica Battini; George Thomas Stilwell
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-26

5.  Automated monitoring of dairy cow body condition, mobility and weight using a single 3D video capture device.

Authors:  M F Hansen; M L Smith; L N Smith; K Abdul Jabbar; D Forbes
Journal:  Comput Ind       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.635

6.  Effect of Slat and Gap Width of Slatted Concrete Flooring on Sow Gait Using Kinematics Analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Devillers; Emmanuel Janvier; Farhoud Delijani; Steve Méthot; Kristopher J Dick; Qiang Zhang; Laurie Connor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Evaluating Alternatives to Locomotion Scoring for Detecting Lameness in Pasture-Based Dairy Cattle in New Zealand: In-Parlour Scoring.

Authors:  Chacha W Werema; Dan A Yang; Linda J Laven; Kristina R Mueller; Richard A Laven
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.