Literature DB >> 24508413

Head CT scan overuse in frequently admitted medical patients.

Mina Owlia1, Lan Yu2, Christopher Deible3, Marion A Hughes3, Franziska Jovin4, Gregory M Bump4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients frequently admitted to medical services undergo extensive computed tomography (CT) imaging. Some of this imaging may be unnecessary, and in particular, head CT scans may be over-used in this patient population. We describe the frequency of abnormal head CT scans in patients with multiple medical hospitalizations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all CT scans done in 130 patients with 7 or more admissions to medical services between January 1 and December 31, 2011 within an integrated health care system. We calculated the number of CT scans, anatomic site of imaging, and source of ordering (emergency department, inpatient floor). We scored all head CT scans on a 0-4 scale based on the severity of radiographic findings. Higher scores signified more clinically important findings.
RESULTS: There were 795 CT scans performed in total, with a mean of 6.7 (± SD 5.8) CT scans per patient. Abdominal/pelvis (39%), chest (30%), and head (22%) CT scans were the most frequently obtained. The mean number of head CT scans performed was 2.9 (SD ± 4.2). Inpatient floors were the major site of CT scan ordering (53.7%). Of 172 head CT scans, only 4% had clinically significant findings (scores of 3 or 4).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with frequent medical admissions are medically complex and undergo multiple CT scans in a year. The vast majority of head CT scans lack clinically significant findings and should be ordered less frequently. Interdisciplinary measures should be advocated by hospitalists, emergency departments, and radiologists to decrease unnecessary imaging in this population.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scans; Over-utilization; Radiation safety

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24508413     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Modern sonology and the bedside practitioner: evolution of ultrasound from curious novelty to essential clinical tool.

Authors:  S P Stawicki; D P Bahner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of sphenoid sinus uniqueness for assessing personal identification: a novel method based on 3D-3D superimposition.

Authors:  Annalisa Cappella; Daniele Gibelli; Michaela Cellina; Debora Mazzarelli; Antonio Giancarlo Oliva; Danilo De Angelis; Chiarella Sforza; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Update on Medical Practices That Should Be Questioned in 2015.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Scott M Wright; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Adult brain cancer in the U.S. black population: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis of incidence, survival, and trends.

Authors:  Abigail Gabriel; Jason Batey; Joseph Capogreco; David Kimball; Andy Walters; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-08-25

5.  Clinical Nomogram Predicting Intracranial Injury in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Thara Tunthanathip; Jarunee Duangsuwan; Niwan Wattanakitrungroj; Sasiporn Tongman; Nakornchai Phuenpathom
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 6.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.