Shannon E MacLean1, Lawrence M Ward2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. 2. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. Electronic address: lward@psych.ubc.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We performed an experiment designed to reveal the brain-regional network dynamics underlying both automatic and intentional auditory change detection as typically indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP). METHODS: High-density EEG was recorded while participants heard a stream of standard pure tones, into which occasional (14%) frequency deviants were inserted. In a first run they listened passively while watching a closed-captioned movie, whereas in a second run they pressed a button each time they detected a deviant while watching the movie with neither sound nor captioning. RESULTS: Independent component analysis revealed independent components that we localized to temporal and frontal regional brain sources relevant to the generation of the MMN. Relative power in various oscillatory frequency bands, computed from a wavelet analysis on the time series of these independent components, was modulated by task demands and stimulus type, as was dynamic phase-locking between pairs of the independent components in those same frequency bands. CONCLUSION: These results support a hierarchical model of MMN generation that emphasizes information processing and transfer between temporal and frontal brain regions. SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to enhancing the use of the MMN to evaluate some aspects of central auditory functioning, these results could be important for the evaluation of alterations in other cognitive functions or in consciousness.
OBJECTIVE: We performed an experiment designed to reveal the brain-regional network dynamics underlying both automatic and intentional auditory change detection as typically indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP). METHODS: High-density EEG was recorded while participants heard a stream of standard pure tones, into which occasional (14%) frequency deviants were inserted. In a first run they listened passively while watching a closed-captioned movie, whereas in a second run they pressed a button each time they detected a deviant while watching the movie with neither sound nor captioning. RESULTS: Independent component analysis revealed independent components that we localized to temporal and frontal regional brain sources relevant to the generation of the MMN. Relative power in various oscillatory frequency bands, computed from a wavelet analysis on the time series of these independent components, was modulated by task demands and stimulus type, as was dynamic phase-locking between pairs of the independent components in those same frequency bands. CONCLUSION: These results support a hierarchical model of MMN generation that emphasizes information processing and transfer between temporal and frontal brain regions. SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to enhancing the use of the MMN to evaluate some aspects of central auditory functioning, these results could be important for the evaluation of alterations in other cognitive functions or in consciousness.
Authors: Sarah M Haigh; Brian A Coffman; Timothy K Murphy; Christiana D Butera; Justin R Leiter-McBeth; Dean F Salisbury Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Fahimeh Mamashli; Sheraz Khan; Hari Bharadwaj; Konstantinos Michmizos; Santosh Ganesan; Keri-Lee A Garel; Javeria Ali Hashmi; Martha R Herbert; Matti Hämäläinen; Tal Kenet Journal: Autism Res Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Daisuke Koshiyama; Michael L Thomas; Makoto Miyakoshi; Yash B Joshi; Juan L Molina; Kumiko Tanaka-Koshiyama; Joyce Sprock; David L Braff; Neal R Swerdlow; Gregory A Light Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Holly N Phillips; Alejandro Blenkmann; Laura E Hughes; Silvia Kochen; Tristan A Bekinschtein; James B Rowe Journal: Cortex Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 4.027