Literature DB >> 24507986

Impact of tricuspid regurgitation after redo valvular surgery on survival in patients with previous mitral valve replacement.

Naoto Fukunaga1, Yukikatsu Okada2, Yasunobu Konishi2, Takashi Murashita2, Hideo Kanemitsu2, Tadaaki Koyama2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The impact on survival of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after redo valvular surgery in patients with previous mitral valve replacement (MVR) is unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 118 consecutive patients undergoing redo valvular surgery after MVR over a 20-year period. We determined the impact of TR after redo valvular surgery on survival and clinical factors that were associated with TR of 2+ or higher. The mean follow-up period was 7.1±6.5 years.
RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 8.5% (10 of 118). Logistic regression analysis revealed that cardiopulmonary bypass duration (odds ratio, 1.025; P=.0270) was an independent risk factor for hospital death. There were 25 late deaths. Survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was 77.5%±4.2%, 68.5%±5.1%, and 58.8%±6.3%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TR less than 2+ at discharge was a predictor of late survival (hazard ratio, 0.043; P<.0382), whereas age, female sex, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and cardiopulmonary bypass duration were predictors of late death. Survival for patients with TR less than 2+ versus 2+ or higher after redo surgery were 91.4%±3.4% versus 59.5%±11.9% at 5 years and 81.1%±5.3% versus 52.1%±12.5% at 10 years, respectively (log-rank P=.0285). Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative TR (odds ratio, 3.718; P=.0044) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio, 28.576; P=.0154) were independent risk factors for TR of 2+ or higher after redo surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival in patients with TR of 2+ or higher after redo valvular surgery was poor. The results of this study suggest that it is important to maintain a postoperative TR less than 2+ to improve long-term survival.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24507986     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Benefits of a right anterolateral minithoracotomy rather than a median sternotomy in isolated tricuspid redo procedures.

Authors:  Aikebaier Maimaiti; Lai Wei; Ye Yang; Huan Liu; Chunsheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Mitral valve restenosis after closed mitral commissurotomy: case discussion.

Authors:  Anyi Xu; Jiang Jin; Xiaodong Li; Jian Xiao; Peng Zhu; Wenhui Gong; Yue Liu; Yuetian Yu; Chunguang Wang; Chengxin Zhang; Irbaz Hameed; Arash Salemi; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Taufiek Konrad Rajab; Francesco Nappi; Jianfei Shen; Baofu Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Isolated Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Outcomes and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Tahir I Mohamed; Omar J Baqal; Abdulaziz A Binzaid; Hussam T AlHennawi; Abdulrahman R Barakeh; Omar M Mrayati; Aly M Alsanei
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve in Valve From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Salman Zahid; Muhammad U Khan; Asim Kichloo; Shakeel Jamal; Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas; Waqas Ullah; Yasar Sattar; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.