Literature DB >> 24507820

Mandibular reconstruction with a bioactive-coated cementless Ti6Al4V modular endoprosthesis in Macaca fascicularis.

N Chanchareonsook1, H Tideman2, S Lee2, S J Hollister3, C Flanagan3, J A Jansen4.   

Abstract

The titanium mandibular modular endoprosthesis fixed with polymethylmethacrylate cement in the medullary space of the mandible has been introduced in previous studies. However, the internal parts of these devices have been found to be prone to loosening and wound dehiscence. The current study introduces a newly designed bioactive-coated cementless modular mandibular endoprosthesis, which was used for reconstruction in Macaca fascicularis. The devices were coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) and hydroxyapatite/bioglass (HA/BG) and implanted in unilateral mandibular segmental defects in nine monkeys for 6 months. Biomechanical testing found the reconstructed mandible to have a mean stiffness value of 110.43 N/mm. Histologically, there were both fibrous capsule and woven bone around the device body, and histomorphology analysis showed 64.17% bone contact to device stem surface. The percentage bone volume calculated from micro-computed tomography analysis around the stem surface was found to be superior to that reported in previous studies of cemented mandibular endoprostheses. Intermodular connection screw loosening has also been resolved with the dovetail interconnection. In conclusion, the current bioactive-coated cementless mandibular endoprosthesis is feasible for use in mandibular segmental reconstruction. However, insufficient load-bearing capability and a high rate of intraoral wound dehiscence were found in the majority of the study animals. Further device modifications and improvements in the surgical technique need to be addressed in future studies.
Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioactive; bioglass (BG); cementless endoprosthesis; hydroxyapatite (HA); mandible; modular endoprosthesis; reconstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24507820     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  3 in total

Review 1.  Main Applications and Recent Research Progresses of Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Libo Wu; Jie Hu; Xiongming Zhou; Fei He; Li Wan; Shu-Ting Pan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Controversial Aspects of Diagnostics and Therapy of Arthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint in Rheumatoid and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-An Analysis of Evidence- and Consensus-Based Recommendations Based on an Interdisciplinary Guideline Project.

Authors:  Christopher Schmidt; Rudolf Reich; Bernd Koos; Taila Ertel; Marcus Oliver Ahlers; Martin Arbogast; Ima Feurer; Mario Habermann-Krebs; Tim Hilgenfeld; Christian Hirsch; Boris Hügle; Thekla von Kalle; Johannes Kleinheinz; Andreas Kolk; Peter Ottl; Christoph Pautke; Merle Riechmann; Andreas Schön; Linda Skroch; Marcus Teschke; Wolfgang Wuest; Andreas Neff
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Scar quality examination comparing titanium-coated suture material and non-coated suture material on flap donor sites in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Laura K Berninghausen; Georg Osterhoff; Stefan Langer; Lukas H Kohler
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.