Literature DB >> 24507691

Visually evoked blood flow responses and interaction with dynamic cerebral autoregulation: correction for blood pressure variation.

Erik D Gommer1, Guy Bogaarts2, Esther G H J Martens2, Werner H Mess2, Jos P H Reulen2.   

Abstract

Visually evoked flow responses recorded using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography are often quantified using a dynamic model of neurovascular coupling. The evoked flow response is seen as the model's response to a visual step input stimulus. However, the continuously active process of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) compensating cerebral blood flow for blood pressure fluctuations may induce changes of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) as well. The effect of blood pressure variability on the flow response is evaluated by separately modeling the dCA-induced effects of beat-to-beat measured blood pressure related CBFV changes. Parameters of 71 subjects are estimated using an existing, well-known second order dynamic neurovascular coupling model proposed by Rosengarten et al., and a new model extending the existing model with a CBFV contributing component as the output of a dCA model driven by blood pressure as input. Both models were evaluated for mean and systolic CBFV responses. The model-to-data fit errors of mean and systolic blood pressure for the new model were significantly lower compared to the existing model: mean: 0.8%±0.6 vs. 2.4%±2.8, p<0.001; systolic: 1.5%±1.2 vs. 2.2%±2.6, p<0.001. The confidence bounds of all estimated neurovascular coupling model parameters were significantly (p<0.005) narrowed for the new model. In conclusion, blood pressure correction of visual evoked flow responses by including cerebral autoregulation in model fitting of averaged responses results in significantly lower fit errors and by that in more reliable model parameter estimation. Blood pressure correction is more effective when mean instead of systolic CBFV responses are used. Measurement and quantification of neurovascular coupling should include beat-to-beat blood pressure measurement.
Copyright © 2014 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral blood flow; Evoked response; Neurovascular coupling; Parameter estimation; Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24507691     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neurovascular coupling in humans: Physiology, methodological advances and clinical implications.

Authors:  Aaron A Phillips; Franco Hn Chan; Mei Mu Zi Zheng; Andrei V Krassioukov; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Temporal evolution of neurovascular coupling recovery following moderate- and high-intensity exercise.

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Alannah Macaulay; Paige V Copeland; Omeet Khatra; Kevin J Bouliane; Jonathan D Smirl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-01

3.  Does task complexity impact the neurovascular coupling response similarly between males and females?

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Rebecca M Wassmuth; Courtney M Kennedy; Lauren N Miutz; Kailey T Newel; Joseph Carere; Jonathan D Smirl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-09

4.  Computational modeling and analysis of iron release from macrophages.

Authors:  Alka A Potdar; Joydeep Sarkar; Nupur K Das; Paroma Ghosh; Miklos Gratzl; Paul L Fox; Gerald M Saidel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Neurovascular coupling response to cognitive examination in healthy controls: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Lucy Beishon; Claire A L Williams; Thompson G Robinson; Victoria J Haunton; Ronney B Panerai
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.