BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the prognostic value of standard criteria donor/expanded criteria donor (SCD/ECD) designation, with regard to one-yr GFR and graft survival rate, in a region with short, cold ischemic time (CIT), and how this designation compares with the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and zero-time kidney biopsies. METHODS: We reviewed 362 cases of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Donor kidneys were classified as SCD or ECD. They were also assessed by the KDRI. Zero-time kidney biopsy was performed in 196 patients, and histologic score was assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 46 months. Forty-two cases (11.6%) used ECD kidneys. The mean CIT was only 4.9 ± 2.7 h. Graft survival rates were not significantly different between ECD and SCD groups. The KDRI showed the best correlation with one-yr estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (R(2) = 0.230, p < 0.001), and higher KDRI was associated with a higher risk of graft failure (hazard ratio 2.63, 95% confidence interval 1.01-6.87). However, higher histologic score was not associated with a higher risk of graft failure. CONCLUSION: KDRI has greater predictive value for short-term outcomes in DDKT with short CIT than the SCD/ECD designation or pathology.
BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the prognostic value of standard criteria donor/expanded criteria donor (SCD/ECD) designation, with regard to one-yr GFR and graft survival rate, in a region with short, cold ischemic time (CIT), and how this designation compares with the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and zero-time kidney biopsies. METHODS: We reviewed 362 cases of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Donor kidneys were classified as SCD or ECD. They were also assessed by the KDRI. Zero-time kidney biopsy was performed in 196 patients, and histologic score was assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 46 months. Forty-two cases (11.6%) used ECD kidneys. The mean CIT was only 4.9 ± 2.7 h. Graft survival rates were not significantly different between ECD and SCD groups. The KDRI showed the best correlation with one-yr estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (R(2) = 0.230, p < 0.001), and higher KDRI was associated with a higher risk of graft failure (hazard ratio 2.63, 95% confidence interval 1.01-6.87). However, higher histologic score was not associated with a higher risk of graft failure. CONCLUSION: KDRI has greater predictive value for short-term outcomes in DDKT with short CIT than the SCD/ECD designation or pathology.
Authors: María José Pérez-Sáez; Núria Montero; Dolores Redondo-Pachón; Marta Crespo; Julio Pascual Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Neel Koyawala; Peter P Reese; Isaac E Hall; Yaqi Jia; Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook; Sherry G Mansour; Mona D Doshi; Enver Akalin; Jonathan S Bromberg; Meera N Harhay; Sumit Mohan; Thangamani Muthukumar; Bernd Schröppel; Pooja Singh; Francis L Weng; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Carl-Ludwig Fischer-Fröhlich; Marcus Kutschmann; Johanna Feindt; Irene Schmidtmann; Günter Kirste; Nils R Frühauf; Ulrike Wirges; Axel Rahmel; Christina Schleicher Journal: J Transplant Date: 2015-10-11
Authors: Ann Young; Greg A Knoll; Eric McArthur; Stephanie N Dixon; Amit X Garg; Charmaine E Lok; Ngan N Lam; S Joseph Kim Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2018-07-27
Authors: Catherine E Kling; James D Perkins; Christopher K Johnson; Christopher D Blosser; Nicolae Leca; Lena Sibulesky Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 1.530
Authors: Maximilian Dahmen; Felix Becker; Hermann Pavenstädt; Barbara Suwelack; Katharina Schütte-Nütgen; Stefan Reuter Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.379