Literature DB >> 24506633

Improving the energy response of external beam therapy (EBT) GafChromicTM dosimetry films at low energies (≤ 100 keV).

H Bekerat1, S Devic1, F DeBlois1, K Singh2, A Sarfehnia2, J Seuntjens2, Shelley Shih3, Xiang Yu3, D Lewis3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Purpose of this work is to investigate the effects of varying the active layer composition of external beam therapy (EBT) GafChromic(TM) films on the energy dependence of the film, as well as try to develop a new prototype with more uniform energy response at low photon energies (⩽ 100 keV).
METHODS: First, the overall energy response (S(AD, W)(Q)) of different commercial EBT type film models that represent the three different generations produced to date, i.e., EBT, EBT2, and EBT3, was investigated. Pieces of each film model were irradiated to a fixed dose of 2 Gy to water for a wide range of beam qualities and the corresponding S(AD, W)(Q) was measured using a flatbed document scanner. Furthermore, the DOSRZnrc Monte Carlo code was used to determine the absorbed dose to water energy dependence of the film, f(Q). Moreover, the intrinsic energy dependence, kbq(Q), for each film model was evaluated using the corresponding S(AD, W)(Q) and f(Q). In the second part of this study, the authors investigated the effects of changing the chemical composition of the active layer on SAD, W(Q). Finally, based on these results, the film manufacturer fabricated several film prototypes and the authors evaluated their S(AD, W)(Q).
RESULTS: The commercial EBT film model shows an under response at all energies below 100 keV reaching 39% ± 4% at about 20 keV. The commercial EBT2 and EBT3 film models show an under response of about 27% ± 4% at 20 keV and an over response of about 16% ± 4% at 40 keV.S(AD, W)(Q) of the three commercial film models at low energies show strong correlation with the corresponding f(-) (1)(Q) curves. The commercial EBT3 model with 4% Cl in the active layer shows under response of 22% ± 4% at 20 keV and 6% ± 4% at about 40 keV. However, increasing the mass percent of chlorine makes the film more hygroscopic which may affect the stability of the film's readout. The EBT3 film prototype with 7.5% Si shows a significant improvement in the energy response at very low energies compared to the commercial EBT3 films with 4% Cl. It shows under response of 15% ± 5% at about 20 keV to 2% ± 5% at about 40 keV. However, according to the manufacturer, the addition of 7.5% Si as SiO2 adversely affected the viscosity of the active fluid and therefore affected the potential use in commercial machine coating. The latest commercial EBT3 film model with 7% Al as Al2O3 shows an overall improvement in SAD, W(Q) compared to previous commercial EBT3 films. It shows under response at all energies <100 keV, varying from 20% ± 4% at 20 keV to 6% ± 4% at 40 keV.
CONCLUSIONS: The energy response of films in the energy range <100 keV can be improved by adjusting the active layer chemical composition. Removing bromine eliminated the over response at about 40 keV. The under response at energies ≤ 30 keV is improved by adding 7% Al to the active layer in the latest commercial EBT3 film models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24506633     DOI: 10.1118/1.4860157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  LET dependent response of GafChromic films investigated with MeV ion beams.

Authors:  V Grilj; D J Brenner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Measurement of percentage dose at the surface for a 6 MV photon beam.

Authors:  O O Galván De la Cruz; M A Rodríguez-Ávila; T Rivera-Montalvo; O A García Garduño
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-18

3.  Alkali Metal Salts of 10,12-Pentacosadiynoic Acid and Their Dosimetry Applications.

Authors:  Amy V Hall; Osama M Musa; David K Hood; David C Apperley; Dmitry S Yufit; Jonathan W Steed
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 4.  Present state and issues in IORT Physics.

Authors:  Frank W Hensley
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Evaluation of NanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter for Cone-shaped Small-field Dosimetry of Cyberknife Stereotactic Radiosurgery Unit: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Dosimetric Verification Study.

Authors:  Fadil Akyol; Neslihan Sarigul; Mete Yeginer; Yagiz Yedekci; Haluk Utku
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

6.  Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir-192 high dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Lyu Huang; Hani Gaballa; Jenghwa Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Expired EBT3 Films' Sensitivity for the Measurement of X-ray and UV Radiation: An Optical Analysis.

Authors:  Hamad Yahia Abu Mhanna; Ahmad Fairuz Omar; Yasmin Md Radzi; Hanan Fawaz Akhdar; Haytham Al Ewaidat
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Synthesis and Characterization of a New Nanocomposite Film Based on Polyvinyl Alcohol Polymer and Nitro Blue Tetrazolium Dye as a Low Radiation Dosimeter in Medical Diagnostics Application.

Authors:  Saleh Alashrah; Yassine El-Ghoul; Mohammed Ahmed Ali Omer
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Different Dosimeters/Detectors Used in Small-Field Dosimetry: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Wrya Parwaie; Soheila Refahi; Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Bagher Farhood
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

10.  Monte Carlo simulations of EBT3 film dose deposition for percentage depth dose (PDD) curve evaluation.

Authors:  Spencer M Robinson; Nolan Esplen; Derek Wells; Magdalena Bazalova-Carter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.