Literature DB >> 24506062

Impact on quality of life of radical prostatectomy after initial active surveillance: more to lose?

Roderick C N van den Bergh1, Willem de Blok, Erik van Muilekom, Corinne Tillier, Lionne D Venderbos, Henk G van der Poel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether deferred radical therapy for low-risk prostate cancer has an additionally unfavourable effect on quality of life (QoL). Substantial numbers of patients on active surveillance (AS) are eventually treated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the NCI-AvL (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) received systematic QoL questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively. Questionnaires included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module and Prostate Module (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-PR25), International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Patients with low-risk prostate cancer who received RARP after an initial period of AS (AS-RARP group) were compared with similar patients who primarily elected surgery (direct-RARP group).
RESULTS: The AS-RARP group included 29 patients who received RARP after a median period of 15.4 months of AS (range 3.0-18.8 months). Main reasons for deferred radical therapy were repeat biopsy risk reclassification (45%) and prostate-specific antigen progression (38%). The direct-RARP group included 363 patients treated after 3.3 months (range 0.1-45.5 months). RARP generally resulted in clinically relevant unfavourable changes on different QoL domains in both groups. Preoperatively the AS-RARP group showed more favourable scores on multiple QoL domains (physical functioning, p = 0.004; role functioning, p = 0.001; global health, p = 0.043; sexual activity, p = 0.001; sexual functioning, p = 0.029; IIEF-15, p = 0.042). Postoperatively, most of these more favourable scores in the AS-RARP group had changed to scores similar to the direct-RARP group, except for IIEF-15 (p = 0.027) and urinary symptoms (p = 0.001). When using a 12 month treatment delay threshold, a similar but less distinct effect was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk prostate cancer who choose AS have more favourable preoperative QoL scores than patients who primarily elect radical prostatectomy, but these groups show similar postoperative QoL scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active surveillance; expectant management; prostate cancer; quality of life; radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24506062     DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2013.876097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  3 in total

1.  Prospective quality-of-life outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer: Active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Claudio Jeldres; Jennifer Cullen; Lauren M Hurwitz; Erika M Wolff; Katherine E Levie; Katherine Odem-Davis; Richard B Johnston; Khanh N Pham; Inger L Rosner; Timothy C Brand; James O L'Esperance; Joseph R Sterbis; Ruth Etzioni; Christopher R Porter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Association between number of prostate biopsies and patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance protocols.

Authors:  Christopher B Anderson; Amy L Tin; Daniel D Sjoberg; John P Mulhall; Jaspreet Sandhu; Karim Touijer; Vincent P Laudone; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Validated Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Beyond Continence and Erections.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Fouad Aoun; Thierry Quackels; Grégoire Assenmacher; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.