Literature DB >> 24505425

Association of cholecystectomy with metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population.

Chao Shen1, Xiaoliang Wu2, Chengfu Xu3, Chaohui Yu3, Peng Chen1, Youming Li3.   

Abstract

An association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome has not been fully established. Here we analyzed the association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population of 5672 subjects who undergone annual health checkups at the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University between January 2011 and December 2012. The prevalences of gallstones, cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome were 6.0%, 3.6%, and 32.5%, respectively. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was significantly higher in subjects with a history of cholecystectomy (63.5%) than in those with gallstones (47.0%) or in those without gallstone disease (30.3%; P<0.01 for both). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cholecystectomy was significantly associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.872; 95% CI: 1.193-2.937). However, the association of gallstones with metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant (OR = 1.267; 95% CI: 0.901-1.782). Altogether, our results suggest that cholecystectomy significantly increases the risk of metabolic syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24505425      PMCID: PMC3914934          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of disorders that include abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and impaired glucose tolerance [1], [2]. Epidemiological studies showed that more than one-third of adults and a rapidly increasing number of children have metabolic syndrome in the United States [3], [4], and it is epidemic in developing countries as well [5], [6]. Metabolic syndrome has been associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [7]–[9]. Therefore, metabolic syndrome is a major health concern worldwide. Obesity is the most important risk factor for metabolic syndrome, and a link between insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome has been established [10], [11]. Nevertheless, despite numerous studies, the risk factors for metabolic syndrome remain insufficiently understood. Previous studies reported that subjects with gallstone diseases were more likely to have metabolic syndrome than those without gallstone disease [12], [13], and patients with complicated gallstone disease had a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome than those with uncomplicated gallstone disease [14]. Conversely, insulin resistance increases the risk of gallstone disease [15]. These studies point toward an association between gallstone diseases and metabolic syndrome. Gallstone diseases may be asymptomatic or symptomatic, and the latter often requires cholecystectomy. Several lines of evidence indicate that cholecystectomy may increase risk of metabolic syndrome. For example, serum and hepatic triglyceride levels increased 25% after cholecystectomy in mice [16]. In clinical settings, cholecystectomized patients three years after the surgery were found to have a significant increase in very low density lipoprotein and intermediate density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B (ApoB) concentration [17]. In other studies, a slight deterioration of postprandial glycemic control, increases in body mass index, and risks for cardiovascular disease were observed in patients after cholecystectomy [18]–[21]. Most significantly for the present work, a large sample study reported in 2013 that cholecystectomy, but not gallstones, was associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome [22]. To date, however, the association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome has not been fully defined. In this study, we performed a large sample, cross-sectional survey to investigate the association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All participants were informed about the purpose and general procedures of the examination. Written informed consent was not required because of the observational nature of the investigation. The subject information was anonymized at collection and anonymized prior to analysis. The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University approved the study’s protocol and manner of consent.

Subjects

Study subjects were recruited from the participants who had voluntarily undergone annual health checkups at the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University between January 2011 and December 2012. The analyses were limited to the subjects who underwent abdominal ultrasonography, and those who had full records of anthropometric and biochemical data. A total of 5672 subjects (3699 men and 1973 women) were included in the final analysis.

Clinical Examination

Clinical examinations were performed by trained staffs using standardized procedures [23], [24]. Height and weight were measured using an automatic digital stadiometer, with the subjects dressed in a light gown and standing barefoot. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Waist circumference was measured using a non-stretchable standard tape. Blood pressure was measured using standardized procedures. Fasting whole blood samples were obtained from an antecubital vein and serum samples were separated for biochemical analysis without freezing. The biochemical values were measured with a Hitachi 7600 autoanalyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using standard methods. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed in each subjects and gallstone disease was defined as ultrasound documented gallstones or evidence of a cholecystectomy. The reason for cholecystectomy was inquired and cholecystectomy due to reasons other than symptomatic gallstones or gallstone-related complications was excluded from the analysis in this study.

Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome

Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in accordance with the criteria established by the International Diabetes Federation published in 2006 [25]. For a subject who had central obesity (defined for ethnic Chinese as waist circumference ≥90 cm for men and ≥80 cm for women), metabolic syndrome was diagnosed if any two or more of the following were present: (i) triglyceride ≥1.7 mmol/L or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality; (ii) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.03 mmol/L in men and <1.29 mmol/L in women; (iii) systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg, or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension; or (iv) fasting blood glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L, or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (25%–75%), according to the normality of the data. Comparisons between the independent groups were conducted using Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the odds ratio (OR) for metabolic syndrome, comparing subjects with gallstone disease to those without gallstone disease. P<0.05 (2-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 5672 subjects enrolled in this study, 338 had gallstone, and 203 subjects had a history of cholecystectomy (Table 1). Subjects with gallstone diseases were associated with older age and had more metabolic abnormalities than those without gallstone diseases. In comparison to the subjects with gallstone, cholecystectomized subjects were associated with higher body mass index, and waist circumference, and higher levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, triglyceride, and fasting blood glucose. These results indicate that cholecystectomized subjects were significantly more likely to have more metabolic abnormalities than those with gallstones.
Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the subjects according to gallstone disease status.

All subjects, without or with gallstone diseaseSubjects with gallstone diseases
Withouta Withb P value Gallstonesc Cholecystectomyd P value
Age (years)50.3 (9.8)55.0 (10.0)<0.00154.8 (10.4)55.4 (9.2)0.452
Gender (male/female)3353/1778346/1950.537e 230/108116/870.012e
Body mass index (kg/m2)24.53 (3.10)25.56 (3.07)<0.00125.28 (3.09)26.02 (2.98)0.006
Waist circumference (cm)86.1 (9.5)89.4 (9.2)<0.00188.8 (9.3)90.5 (8.9)0.031
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)129.9 (17.6)135.4 (18.0)<0.001134.5 (17.8)136.9 (18.2)0.124
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)78.9 (11.4)82.2 (10.6)<0.00182.1 (10.5)82.5 (10.8)0.648
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)21.0 (15.0–31.0)23.0 (17.0–34.0)<0.001f 22.0 (15.0–32.0)26.0 (19.0–38.0)<0.001f
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)21.0 (18.0–25.0)21.0 (18.0–26.0)0.093f 21.0 (18.0–25.0)23.0 (19.0–27.0)0.009f
γ-Glutamyltransferase (U/L)26.0 (16.0–46.0)30.0 (19.0–55.0)<0.001f 31.0 (19.0–56.0)30.0 (19.0–27.0)0.980f
Triglyceride (mmol/L)1.38 (0.96–2.05)1.69 (1.12–2.46)<0.001f 1.54 (1.05–2.35)1.88 (1.33–2.55)0.001f
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.93 (0.96)5.01 (0.96)0.0634.99 (0.93)5.04 (1.01)0.627
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)1.15 (0.30)1.11 (0.31)0.0041.12 (0.30)1.09 (0.32)0.156
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L)4.73 (4.41–5.13)4.98 (4.54–5.51)<0.001f 4.92 (4.50–5.28)5.10 (4.61–6.01)<0.001f
Serum uric acid (μmol/L)344.2 (88.4)363.0 (94.9)<0.001365.4 (95.8)358.9 (93.5)0.440
Metabolic syndrome (Yes/No)1553/3578288/253<0.001159/179129/74<0.001

The data are expressed as the mean ± SD or median (IQR) depending on the data distribution. HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

n = 5131;

n = 541;

n = 338;

n = 203;

χ 2 value;

z value.

The data are expressed as the mean ± SD or median (IQR) depending on the data distribution. HDL, high-density lipoprotein. n = 5131; n = 541; n = 338; n = 203; χ 2 value; z value. The overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 32.5%. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was significantly higher for the subjects with gallstone diseases (53.2%) than those without gallstone diseases (30.3%; χ 2 test, P<0.001). A finding of note was that cholecystectomized subjects were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (63.5%) than those with gallstones (47.0%; χ 2 test, P<0.001). The associations between gallstone diseases and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome compound features were also analyzed (Figure 1). In comparison to the subjects without gallstone, the prevalence of central obesity, elevated triglyceride, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, and elevated fasting blood glucose all tended to increase in subjects with gallstones, and further increase in cholecystectomized subjects. These results support a significant association between gallstone diseases, and especially cholecystectomy, with metabolic syndrome.
Figure 1

Prevalences of metabolic syndrome and each of its component features.

The prevalences of metabolic syndrome and each of its component features in individuals with gallstones were higher than the prevalences in individuals without gallstones, and higher still in those who had undergone cholecystectomy (all with P for trend <0.001). BP, blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting blood glucose.

Prevalences of metabolic syndrome and each of its component features.

The prevalences of metabolic syndrome and each of its component features in individuals with gallstones were higher than the prevalences in individuals without gallstones, and higher still in those who had undergone cholecystectomy (all with P for trend <0.001). BP, blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting blood glucose. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the ORs for metabolic syndrome with gallstone diseases (Table 2). Univariate regression analysis showed that both gallstones (OR = 1.929, 95% CI: 1.546–2.406) and cholecystectomy (OR = 3.826, 95% CI: 2.858–5.120) were associated with the risk factors for metabolic syndrome. After adjusting for factors associated with metabolic syndrome, multivariate regression analysis showed that cholecystectomy remains significantly associated with metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.872; 95% CI: 1.193–2.937), while the association of gallstones with metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant (OR = 1.267; 95% CI: 0.901–1.782). These results indicate a stronger association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome than between gallstones and metabolic syndrome.
Table 2

Logistic regression analysis of odds ratios for the metabolic syndrome relative to gallstone diseases.

Univariate regression analysisMultivariate regression analysis*
OR95% CI P value OR95% CI P value
Without gallstone disease0.3810.319–0.456<0.0010.6670.504–0.8820.005
Gallstones only1.9291.546–2.406<0.0011.2670.901–1.7820.173
Cholecystectomy only3.8262.858–5.120<0.0011.8721.193–2.9370.006

Data are adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and serum uric acid.

Data are adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and serum uric acid.

Discussion

In this study, our results indicated that cholecystectomy is significantly associated with metabolic syndrome. Cholecystectomized subjects had a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its compound of features than subjects with gallstones or normal gallbladder. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that cholecystectomy, but not gallstones, was significantly associated with metabolic syndrome. This indicates that metabolic syndrome is more strongly related to cholecystectomy than its relation with gallstones. The association between gallstone disease and metabolic syndrome has received much attention. Mendez-Sanchez et al. [12] were the first report that gallstone disease was strongly associated with metabolic syndrome. Their observation was confirmed by another two large sample studies [13], [26]. Recently, Ata et al. [14] reported that metabolic syndrome was more prevalent among subjects with complicated gallstone disease than among those with uncomplicated gallstone disease, suggesting an association between metabolic syndrome and the severity of gallstone disease. Most of these studies only included gallstones, whereas a few have examined cholecystectomy and gallstones separately in regard to metabolic syndrome. Here, we provide evidence that cholecystectomy may be more strongly related to metabolic syndrome than are gallstones. The underlying reasons that might explain why cholecystectomy showed a stronger association with metabolic syndrome than did gallstone remain uncertain. Logically, the mechanism might involve the alteration of glucose and lipid metabolism caused by loss of the gallbladder. After cholecystectomy, bile is continuously secreted into the duodenal lumen, and 24-hour bile acid output is higher than in health individuals [27]. Bile acids may act as hormonal signals through interactions with several enterohepatic and peripheral target receptors such as farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and bile acid receptor TGR5. Both FXR and TGR5 have crucial roles in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism [28], [29]. Another mechanism for that could contribute to the effect of cholecystectomy on the development of metabolic syndrome may be the state of chronic inflammation caused by cholecystectomy. It has been reported that dilation of the common bile duct and increases of bile duct pressure after cholecystectomy causes chronic inflammation in the surrounding liver tissue [30]. Such increased inflammation stimulates the release of cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species, and reactive nitrogen intermediates, all of which may lead to the onset of metabolic syndrome [31], [32]. However, the detailed mechanism requires further investigation. Several limitations are acknowledged in this study. First, the study population was recruited from individuals who attended a health screening at one university hospital and therefore may not represent the entire community. The second limitation is that the causal relationship between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome could not be examined by this cross-sectional study. Finally, information regarding smoking status, physical activity, or alcohol consumption was not available. These factors may act as confounding variables in the association between cholecystectomy and metabolic syndrome. Further longitudinal studies should consider these confounding factors. Despite the limitations described above, our results provide evidence for the first time that metabolic syndrome is common among persons with gallstone disease, and cholecystectomy showed a stronger association with metabolic syndrome than gallstones. These observations suggest that cholecystectomy significantly increases the risk of metabolic syndrome.
  32 in total

1.  The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition.

Authors:  K George M M Alberti; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Stephen R Daniels; Karen A Donato; Robert H Eckel; Barry A Franklin; David J Gordon; Ronald M Krauss; Peter J Savage; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Fernando Costa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  The evolving role of inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Yong-Ho Lee; Richard E Pratley
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  The metabolic syndrome as a predictor of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Masahide Hamaguchi; Takao Kojima; Noriyuki Takeda; Takayuki Nakagawa; Hiroya Taniguchi; Kota Fujii; Tatsushi Omatsu; Tomoaki Nakajima; Hiroshi Sarui; Makoto Shimazaki; Takahiro Kato; Junichi Okuda; Kazunori Ida
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Weight gain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R B Ali; R A Cahill; R G K Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for gallstone disease.

Authors:  Nahum Méndez-Sánchez; Norberto C Chavez-Tapia; Daniel Motola-Kuba; Karla Sanchez-Lara; Guadalupe Ponciano-Rodríguez; Héctor Baptista; Martha H Ramos; Misael Uribe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Low-grade inflammation may play a role in the etiology of the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: the HIFMECH study.

Authors:  J S Yudkin; I Juhan-Vague; E Hawe; S E Humphries; G di Minno; M Margaglione; E Tremoli; T Kooistra; P E Morange; P Lundman; V Mohamed-Ali; A Hamsten
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.694

8.  Effect of cholecystectomy on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels.

Authors:  T Juvonen; K Kervinen; M I Kairaluoma; Y A Kesäniemi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

9.  Prevalence and trends of metabolic syndrome in the adult U.S. population, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez; Michael O Harhay; Meera M Harhay; Sean McElligott
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Change in bile duct pressure responses after cholecystectomy: loss of gallbladder as a pressure reservoir.

Authors:  M Tanaka; S Ikeda; F Nakayama
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cholecystectomy and risk of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Agostino Di Ciaula; Gabriella Garruti; David Q-H Wang; Piero Portincasa
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.487

2.  Cholecystectomy: a way forward and back to metabolic syndrome?

Authors:  Gabriella Garruti; David Q-H Wang; Agostino Di Ciaula; Piero Portincasa
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.662

3.  Cholecystectomy Concomitant with Bariatric Surgery: Safety and Metabolic Effects.

Authors:  Anna Victória Soares de Lucena; Gabriel Guerra Cordeiro; Luis Henrique Albuquerque Leão; Flávio Kreimer; Luciana Teixeira de Siqueira; Guilherme da Conti Oliveira Sousa; Luiz Henrique Soares de Lucena; Álvaro Antônio Bandeira Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Metabolic effects of cholecystectomy: gallbladder ablation increases basal metabolic rate through G-protein coupled bile acid receptor Gpbar1-dependent mechanisms in mice.

Authors:  Víctor Cortés; Ludwig Amigo; Silvana Zanlungo; José Galgani; Fermín Robledo; Marco Arrese; Francisco Bozinovic; Flavio Nervi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Increased Risk of Depressive Disorder following Cholecystectomy for Gallstones.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Tsai; Chao-Hung Chen; Hsin-Chien Lee; Herng-Ching Lin; Cha-Ze Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of cholecystectomy on hepatic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in non-obese Hispanic patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Víctor Cortés; Nicolás Quezada; Sergio Uribe; Marco Arrese; Flavio Nervi
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Is Cholecystectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis Beneficial in Improving the Lipid Profile?

Authors:  Adel Osman; Arwa H Ibrahim; Areej M Alzamil; Abdullah M Alkhalifa; Dania A Badghaish; Faisal H Al-Dera; Reda A Alwosaibi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-01-21

8.  Development of a novel model of cholecystectomy in subsequently ovariectomized mice and characterization of metabolic and gastrointestinal phenotypes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Celeste Alexander; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Anne H Lee; Lindsey K Ly; Miranda D Vieson; Jason M Ridlon; Erik R Nelson; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The Association Between Cholecystectomy and the Risk for Fracture: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Cheol Min Shin; Dong Ho Lee; Kyungdo Han; Sang Hyun Park; Yoo Jin Kim; Hyuk Yoon; Young Soo Park; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  The Association Between Cholecystectomy, Metabolic Syndrome, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Carmen S S Latenstein; Louise J M Alferink; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Joost P H Drenth; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven; Philip R de Reuver
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.