Kyla L Naylor1, William D Leslie, Anthony B Hodsman, David N Rush, Amit X Garg. 1. 1 Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 2 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 3 Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, ON, Canada. 4 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, ON, Canada. 5 Address correspondence to: William Leslie, Saint Boniface General Hospital, 409 Tache Avenue, Room C5102, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) estimates the 10-year fracture probability. We assessed the prognostic value of FRAX in kidney transplant recipients, as its utility in recipients is unknown. METHODS: We considered 458 individuals (mean age 45 years, 64% men) who received a kidney transplant in the province of Manitoba, Canada at the time of their first bone mineral density (BMD) test posttransplant (mean 1.1 years posttransplant; transplant years 1996-2011). FRAX probabilities were calculated from baseline information (age, sex, clinical risk factors, with or without BMD). Recipients were followed a mean of 6.4 years (interquartile range 3.0-10.0 years) after cohort entry for an incident major osteoporotic fracture. RESULTS: In follow-up, 21 (4.6%) recipients experienced a major osteoporotic fracture. The observed 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk of 6.3% (95% CI, 3.4-9.2%) was concordant with FRAX predictions (5.0% with BMD, 5.6% without BMD). Major osteoporotic fracture scores showed significant fracture prediction (hazard ratio per standard deviation, FRAX without BMD 1.66, 95% CI, 1.10-2.50; FRAX with BMD 1.64, 95% CI, 1.07-2.51). Area under the curve (AUC) for incident major osteoporotic fracture discrimination (AUC: FRAX with BMD 0.62, 95% CI, 0.50-0.74) was similar to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: FRAX scores categorized most kidney transplant recipients as a low-risk fracture group, and the low observed fracture rates were consistent with the 10-year fracture predictions. FRAX showed modest fracture prediction and discrimination similar to the general population. Independent validation is needed before clinicians can routinely use FRAX in kidney transplant recipients.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) estimates the 10-year fracture probability. We assessed the prognostic value of FRAX in kidney transplant recipients, as its utility in recipients is unknown. METHODS: We considered 458 individuals (mean age 45 years, 64% men) who received a kidney transplant in the province of Manitoba, Canada at the time of their first bone mineral density (BMD) test posttransplant (mean 1.1 years posttransplant; transplant years 1996-2011). FRAX probabilities were calculated from baseline information (age, sex, clinical risk factors, with or without BMD). Recipients were followed a mean of 6.4 years (interquartile range 3.0-10.0 years) after cohort entry for an incident major osteoporotic fracture. RESULTS: In follow-up, 21 (4.6%) recipients experienced a major osteoporotic fracture. The observed 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk of 6.3% (95% CI, 3.4-9.2%) was concordant with FRAX predictions (5.0% with BMD, 5.6% without BMD). Major osteoporotic fracture scores showed significant fracture prediction (hazard ratio per standard deviation, FRAX without BMD 1.66, 95% CI, 1.10-2.50; FRAX with BMD 1.64, 95% CI, 1.07-2.51). Area under the curve (AUC) for incident major osteoporotic fracture discrimination (AUC: FRAX with BMD 0.62, 95% CI, 0.50-0.74) was similar to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: FRAX scores categorized most kidney transplant recipients as a low-risk fracture group, and the low observed fracture rates were consistent with the 10-year fracture predictions. FRAX showed modest fracture prediction and discrimination similar to the general population. Independent validation is needed before clinicians can routinely use FRAX in kidney transplant recipients.
Authors: Kyla L Naylor; Guangyong Zou; William D Leslie; Anthony B Hodsman; Ngan N Lam; Eric McArthur; Lisa-Ann Fraser; Gregory A Knoll; Jonathan D Adachi; S Joseph Kim; Amit X Garg Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2016-06-24
Authors: Antoine Bouquegneau; Syrazah Salam; Pierre Delanaye; Richard Eastell; Arif Khwaja Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Megan L Salter; Xinran Liu; Sunjae Bae; Nadia M Chu; Alexandra Miller Dunham; Casey Humbyrd; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: A Gaipov; O Cseprekal; P K Potukuchi; K Kabulbayev; A Remport; Z Mathe; M Talwar; V Balaraman; T Fülöp; J D Eason; I Mucsi; C P Kovesdy; M Z Molnar Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.507